M D Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
NCT Number: NCT04083378
This phase II trial studies how well software-aided imaging works in confirming tumor coverage with ablation (the removal or destruction of a body part or tissue or its function) on patients with liver tumors. The current standard for targeting tumor cells and evaluating the outcome of a liver ablation procedure is a visual inspection of the pre- and post-procedure computed tomography (CT) scans. Software-aided imaging systems, such as Morfeus, may help to improve the accuracy and effectiveness of liver ablation.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To evaluate if the intra-procedure feedback of a biomechanical deformable registration volumetric image method during percutaneous ablation will increase the minimal ablation margins on a three-dimensional computed tomography-generated analysis.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To assess whether applying the proposed method during percutaneous ablation improves local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) rates.
II. Evaluate impact of software use on procedure workflow.
III. Impact of software use on complication rates, quality of life, liver function.
IV. Evaluate oncological outcomes (intra-hepatic and overall progression-free survivals, and overall survival).
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I: Patients undergo standard of care ablation.
ARM II: Patients undergo standard of care ablation with software-aided imaging (Morfeus).
After completion of study, patients are followed up at 1, 3, and 6 months, and then at 1 and 2 years.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Undergo standard of care ablation
Other names: ABLATION, Catheter Ablation, Local Ablation Therapy, Local Ablative Therapy
Undergo software-aided imaging (Morfeus)
Other names: Image Guided Therapy, Imaging Guided Therapy
Ancillary studies
Other names: Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Time frame: Visit 2 (baseline/ablation day)
For control group, MAM was assessed by rigid co-registration with side-by-side juxtaposition to verify applicator placement and by visual landmark-based CT measurements on CT workstation (Siemens Healthineers; Forchheim, Germany). For experimental group, CT images were processed with a software-based method on a radiation treatment planning system (Raystation, RaySearch Laboratories; Stockholm, Sweden) with biomechanical deformable imaging registration coupled with AI-based autosegmentation. For experimental group, interventional radiologist (IR) was informed of ablation applicator position relative to tumor on non-contrast CT before thermal ablation energy delivery and of MAM results (including spatial location of suboptimal margins) generated by software-based assessment, with this information not disclosed to IR in control group. Software-based assessment was used to compare MAMs results between both study groups with a two-sample t-test.
Time frame: Time to local tumor progression (LTP) was measured from ablation to earliest LTP or death (competing event). Follow-up imaging continued up to 24 months.
A competing risk analysis was conducted to estimate the 2-year cumulative incidence of local tumor progression. Progression followed ablation reporting standards and RECIST v1.1 (mRECIST for HCC).
Time frame: Overall survival was measured from the date of ablation to the date of death from any cause. Patients still alive were censored at the date of last clinic visit, with follow-up up to 24 months after ablation.
The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Competing risk analysis was conducted to estimate the 2-year intrahepatic (progression outside of ablation zone), considering the progression of the ablated tumor and treating death as a competing event.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Competing risk analysis was conducted to estimate the 2-year extrahepatic cumulative incidence of progression, considering the progression of the ablated tumor and treating death as a competing event.
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Other
Clinical Impact of a Volumetric Image Method for Confirming Tumor Coverage With Ablation on Patients With Malignant Liver Lesions (COVER-ALL)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.