Studio Odont.Associato Dr.P.Cicchese E L.Canullo
Rome, Italy/Rome, 00198, Italy
NCT Number: NCT05821673
Objective of the present study was to assess the peri-implant soft tissue profiles between argon plasma pre-treated (PT) and non-treated (NPT) abutments by comparing clinical and histological parameters 2 months after abutment placement.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Rome, Italy/Rome, 00198, Italy
Patients that need implant supported restoration were recruited for this study. At baseline a specific abutment was screwed at 20 N.Two months following healing abutment placement clinical measurements were evaluated.
Endopoints of the study:
Histological outcomes at 2 using traditional histological staining (ematossilin/eosin) Immunohistological outcomes at 2 using different stainings. Postoperative complications. Comparison between the histological outcomes and the preoperative clinical evaluation of the sites
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
abutments allocated to the test group were placed in an Argon plasma reactor (Diener Electronic GmbH, Jettingen, Germany) for decontamination and activation. In order to restrict any post-treatment contamination; abutments were inserted immediately after the end of the plasma process. The reactor was set at 75 W of power and -10 MPa of pressure for 12 min.
the abutments assigned to the control group were screwed onto the implants without receiving argon plasma pretreatment
Time frame: 2 months after abutment placement
soft peri-implant tissues and abutment were harvested and histologically processedSpecialized stainings (hematoxylin eosin and picrocirious red) coupled with immunohistochemistry (vimentin, collagen, and CK10) were performed to assess soft tissue inflammation and healing, as well as the collagen content keratinization.
Time frame: 2 months after abutment placement
PI scores were recorded in 6 points around each abutment, averaged, and expressed in %. PI was evaluated with a score of 0,1,2, 3 depending on the amount of plaque at each site.
Time frame: 2 months after abutment placement
BoP scores were recorded in 6 points around each abutment, averaged, and expressed in %.BoP was used as a dichotomous variable
Studio Odontoiatrico Associato Dr. P. Cicchese e L. Canullo
Other
Effect of Argon Plasma Abutment Activation on Soft Tissue Healing: RCT Study With Histological Assessment
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07627841
Edentulous Alveolar Ridge, Partially Edentulous Maxilla, Mandible
Cairo, New Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05241548
Bone Loss in Jaw, Edentulous Alveolar Ridge
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07108322
Edentulous Alveolar Ridge, Flabby Ridge
Alexandria, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07061860
Edentulous Alveolar Ridge
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial Details