Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04265768

Soft Tissue Changes Around Dental Implants

This study aims to characterize the healing pattern following soft tissue augmentation procedure concomitant to implant placement.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

20 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Barts and The London Dental Hospital, London, United Kingdom

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This study will characterize, for the first time, the healing pattern of soft tissues around dental implants in case of soft tissue augmentation and in comparison, to normal healing.

An innovative and comprehensive geometric/thermal imaging analysis will be employed that is non-contact and non-invasive to patients and will allow to characterize the healing process in a 2D-3D dimensional and volumetric way.

This approach, combined with LSCI and clinical and radiographic outcomes, will provide new data on the biology and critical phases of soft tissue healing around implants, as well as on the stability and aesthetics of the peri-implant tissues with different grafts.

Patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) will also be used to assess the level of pain and discomfort associated with soft tissue augmentation procedures.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 20 and 80 years.
  • Good medical and psychological health.
  • Absence of untreated caries lesions and untreated/uncontrolled periodontal disease. If patients require periodontal treatment (non-surgical and/or surgical), this has to be arranged outside the study protocol and completed at least 30 days prior to the enrolment.
  • Need of a single-tooth replacement in the aesthetic (incisor, canine or premolar) region.
  • Presence of adequate bone for implant placement without need for significant bone regeneration. In particular, the patients should have a bucco-palatal residual alveolar width of at least 6 mm at the central and crestal aspect of the single tooth gap to ensure complete embedding of an implant by bone (De Bruyckere et al., 2018).
  • A residual alveolar height >8 mm, enough inter-arch space for a crown and a minimum distance of 6 mm from the adjacent teeth.
  • The width and height will be confirmed after x-ray examination in Visit 1 (or extra visit). Cases of small apical fenestration (≤ 25% of implant length) after implant placement will not be excluded, but will be treated according to the GBR principle (collagen membrane associated with a deproteinized bovine bone graft) to re-establish the bone contour and without over contouring.
  • At least 8 weeks of post-extraction socket healing had occurred in the edentulous site.
  • Willingness to sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

  • Self-reported pregnancy and lactation.
  • Any known systemic disease affecting bone metabolism (e.g. Cushing's syndrome, crohn's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, diabetes type I and uncontrolled diabetes type II), systemic infections or recent surgical procedures within 30 days of study initiation.
  • Chronic treatment (i.e., 2 weeks or more) with any medication known to affect oral status (e.g., phenytoin, dihydropyridine, calcium antagonists and cyclosporine) or bone metabolism (e.g. bisphosphonates, hormone replacement therapy, immunosuppressants) within 1 month before baseline visit.
  • HIV or viral hepatitis.
  • Physical handicaps that would interfere with the ability to perform adequate oral hygiene.
  • Self-reported alcoholism or chronic drug abuse.
  • Heavy smokers (>10/cigarettes per day).
  • Patients suffering from a known psychological disorder or with limited mental capacity or language skills such that study information could not be understood, informed consent could be obtained or simple instructions could be followed.
  • Full-mouth bleeding (BOP) and plaque (PI) scores >30% or sites with periodontal pocket depth >5 mm at the completion of the pre-treatment phase.
  • Very thin or very thick biotypes that according to the clinician's judgement would either risk to have complications or would not benefit from receiving a graft.
  • <2 mm KT buccally (from the mucogingival junction to the coronal aspect of the crestal soft tissue).

Treatment and study plan

Soft tissue augmentation surgery with CTG

Procedure

An epithelial-connective tissue graft of approximately 2-3 mm of thickness and adequate length will be taken from the palate or retromolar region of the patient and de-epithelialized with a scalpel (ideally a thickness of 1.5-2.0mm).

The connective tissue graft (CTG) obtained will then be positioned buccally to the dental implant and sutured to the internal side of the flap so to provide soft tissue bulk at the level of the neck of the implant and simulate a root prominence for the missing tooth.

Soft tissue augmentation surgery with Fibro-Gide

Procedure

Fibro-Gide will be used to obtain buccal soft tissue augmentation. Fibro-Gide will be trimmed with a scalpel and adjusted in size and thickness to better adapt to the area buccal to the implant. In particular, the graft will be shaped in order to obtain a graft of approximately 2-3 mm of thickness and adequate length. Fibro-Gide will then be sutured to the inner side of the buccal flap, before repositioning the flap and suturing it in a tension-free way.

No soft tissue augmentation

Procedure

During implant placement surgery, no soft tissue augmentation will be performed

Primary outcomes

  1. 3D intra-oral volume changes in mucosal soft tissue following augmentation

    Time frame: Immediately after implant placement.

    Those changes will be assessed by capturing 3D intra-oral scans at the different time-points.

  2. 3D intra-oral volume changes in mucosal soft tissue following augmentation

    Time frame: 7, 14 and 30 Days post implant placement

    Those changes will be assessed by capturing 3D intra-oral scans at the different time-points.

  3. 3D intra-oral volume changes in mucosal soft tissue following augmentation

    Time frame: 12 weeks and 16 weeks post- implant loading.

    Those changes will be assessed by capturing 3D intra-oral scans at the different time-points.

  4. 3D intra-oral volume changes in mucosal soft tissue following augmentation

    Time frame: 12 month post- implant loading.

    Those changes will be assessed by capturing 3D intra-oral scans at the different time-points.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in gingival thickness

    Time frame: implant placement to 12 weeks after implant placement

    Changes in gingival thickness from the time of implant placement (with or without graft) and 12 weeks after implant placement assessed by a caliper

  2. 3D extra-oral volumetric changes

    Time frame: baseline, immediately after implant placement, 7, 14 and 30 days after implant placement

    3D extra-oral morphometric changes assessed with a facial scanner

  3. 2D-3D intra-oral thermal changes

    Time frame: baseline to 1, 3, 7, 14 and 30 days after implant placement

    2D-3D intra-oral thermal changes using an infrared, contact-free, thermal camera

  4. changes in vascularisation

    Time frame: before and immediately after implant placement, and at post-operative days 1, 3, 7, 14, and 30

    Changes in revascularization in the area of the implant surgery with laser speckle contrast imaging

  5. soft tissue aesthetics

    Time frame: At implant loading and at 12 months after loading.

    Papilla Fill Index and Pink Aesthetic Score

  6. changes in height of keratinised tissue

    Time frame: baseline to 30 days, 12 weeks and 16 weeks after implant placement and 12 months post loading

    changes in height of keratinised tissue measured with a probe

  7. Patients' reported outcomes (PROMS) in oral impact on Daily Performances (OIDP) questionnaire (OIDP)

    Time frame: At basline, 3 months (visit2, 3 and 4), 1 week from visit 2, 2 weeks form visit 2, 1 month from visit 2.

    The OIPD is a well validated and frequently used PROMs in studies of oral health. It is a composite measure of the impacts of oral health on the quality of life of people. The OIDP focuses on the impact of oral health on the quality of life of people. The OIDP focuses on the impact that the conditions of the teeth and social wellbeing of the person. More specifically, it assesses the impact of oral conditions on basic daily life activities and behaviours (eating, speaking, cleaning teeth, going out, relaxing, smiling, major work or role, emotional stability, social contact). For each performance, both the frequency and severity of oral impacts are assessed. The overall OIDP score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life.

  8. PROMs based on the evaluation of global changes in quality of life

    Time frame: At basline, 3 months (visit2, 3 and 4), 1 week from visit 2, 2 weeks form visit 2, 1 month from visit 2.

    Global ratings on health and quality of life will be provided through two methods:

    • The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) included in the EQ5D questionnaire.
    • Through the following question: 'how would you rate the quality of your life'?

    The response will be scored on a six-point scale as:

    • Excellent
    • Very good
    • Good
    • Fair
    • Poor
    • Very poor
  9. PROMs based on the evaluation of patient's perception about therapy

    Time frame: At basline, 3 months (visit2, 3 and 4), 1 week from visit 2, 2 weeks form visit 2, 1 month from visit 2.

    The extent of discomfort and/or pain experienced will be evaluated using a 100-mm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS). The anchors for each end of the scales will be designated as none and extreme. Patients will be also instructed to quantify the analgesic medication taken. In addition, the extent of discomfort, root hypersensitivity, oedema, hematoma, high fever and interference in daily activities during the first post-therapy week will be evaluated in the same way.

  10. Post-operative swelling and oedema

    Time frame: At basline, 3 months (visit2, 3 and 4), 1 week from visit 2, 2 weeks form visit 2, 1 month from visit 2.

    A series of subtracted images from the baseline will accurately identify the area and magnitude of the swelling, changes in facial shape, volume and temperature to monitor/quantify the healing. For every patient, a person specific template of postoperative facial swelling/oedema pattern will be created for sequential swelling/thermal changes or oedema volume measurements that will be applied on a unique alignment of the patient's specific consecutive imaging surfaces (self-defined positioning based on patients facial features).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Queen Mary University of London

Other

Collaborators

  • Geistlich Pharma AG

Registry information

Official study title

Dimensional Soft Tissue Changes Around Dental Implants Following the Use of a Collagen Matrix or a Connective Tissue Graft. A Pilot Study

Acronym: Geistlich

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Feb 12, 2020
Registry last updated
Jun 8, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.