Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00371826

SOCRATES: Steroid or Cyclosporine Removal After Transplantation Using Everolimus

The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of corticosteroid discontinuation versus cyclosporine micro emulsion discontinuation in recipients receiving reduced exposure cyclosporine micro emulsion and corticosteroids plus enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) initially, changed to everolimus at 2 weeks post-transplant. These two groups will be compared to a third control group, who will receive treatment consisting of cyclosporine micro emulsion, enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) and steroids.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, NSW, Australia

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Males and females aged 18-65 years inclusive.
  • First time recipients of cadaveric, living unrelated or living related donor kidney transplants.
  • Patients who are willing and able to participate in the study and from whom written informed consent has been obtained.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who are recipients of multiple organ transplants, including more than one kidney, kidney and pancreas, or previous transplant with any organ other than kidney.
  • Patients at high immunological risk of graft loss, indicated by peak PRA >50% or loss of a previous renal allograft within the first 6 months of transplantation due to acute rejection.
  • Patients who have received an investigational drug within 4 weeks prior to the screening visit.
  • Presence of any severe allergy or hypersensitivity to drugs similar to everolimus (e.g. antibiotics such as Clindamycin)

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may applied

Treatment and study plan

Everolimus (RAD001)

Drug

Other names: Certican®

Cyclosporine (Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI))

Drug

Other names: Neoral®

Methylprednisone/prednisone

Drug

Mycophenolate sodium (MPA)

Drug

Other names: myfortic®

Primary outcomes

  1. Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR) After Kidney Transplant to Evaluate Kidney Function (12 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: At Month 12

    The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated by the Nankivell formula: GFR = 6.7 / Scr + BW / 4 - Surea / 2-100 / (height)^ 2 + C where Scr is the serum creatinine concentration expressed in mmol/L, BW the body weight in kg, Surea the serum urea in mmol/L, height in m, and the constant C is 35 for male and 25 for female patients.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR) After Kidney Transplant to Evaluate Kidney Function (36 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: At Month 24 and 36

    The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated by the Nankivell formula: GFR = 6.7 / Scr + BW / 4 - Surea / 2-100 / (height)^ 2 + C where Scr is the serum creatinine concentration expressed in mmol/L, BW the body weight in kg, Surea the serum urea in mmol/L, height in m, and the constant C is 35 for male and 25 for female patients.

  2. Number of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) Per Treatment Group (12 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: At Month 12

    A biopsy-proven acute rejection is defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III as per Banff 97 classification.

  3. Number of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) Per Treatment Group (36 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: At Month 12, 24 and 36

    A biopsy-proven acute rejection is defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III as per Banff 97 classification.

  4. Number of Participants With Composite Endpoint of Treatment Failure (12 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: Month 12

    Composite endpoint of treatment failure includes biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death and loss-to-follow-up. A BPAR is defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III as per Banff 97 classification.

    The allograft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient started dialysis and was not able to subsequently be removed from dialysis. If the patient underwent a graft nephrectomy, then the day of nephrectomy was the day of graft loss.

  5. Number of Participants With Composite Endpoint of Treatment Failure (36 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: At Month 12, 24 and 36

    Composite endpoint of treatment failure includes biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death and loss-to-follow-up. A BPAR is defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III as per Banff 97 classification.

    The allograft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient started dialysis and was not able to subsequently be removed from dialysis. If the patient underwent a graft nephrectomy, then the day of nephrectomy was the day of graft loss.

  6. Number of Participants With Histological Evidence Chronic Allograft Nephropathy (CAN) (12 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: At Month 12

    A per-protocol biopsy was performed at Baseline and Month 12 and read by an independent blinded pathologist in order to assess chronic allograft nephropathy. Chronic rejection is characterized by a slow progressive decline in renal function and is typically preceded by the histological picture of chronic allograft nephropathy. The presence of biopsy confirmed Grade I, II or III chronic allograft nephropathy by Banff 97 criteria was assessed on all optional biopsies obtained for clinical suspicion of chronic rejection.

    Data summarized by 3 categories. "Yes" - Patients with histological evidence of CAN ; "No" - Patients with histological evidence of CAN and "Not Done" - Central protocol defined kidney allograft biopsies were not done.

  7. Number of Participants With Histological Evidence Chronic Allograft Nephropathy (CAN) (36 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: At Month 36

    Chronic rejection is characterized by a slow progressive decline in renal function and is typically preceded by the histological picture of chronic allograft nephropathy. The presence of biopsy confirmed Grade I, II or III chronic allograft nephropathy by Banff 97 criteria was assessed on all optional biopsies obtained for clinical suspicion of chronic rejection.

    Data summarized by 3 categories. "Yes" - Patients with histological evidence of CAN ; "No" - Patients with histological evidence of CAN and "Not Done" - Central protocol defined kidney allograft biopsies were not done.

  8. Number of Participants With Sub Clinical Acute Rejection (12 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: At Month 12

    Based on Banff 97 criteria, sub clinical acute rejection can be:

    GRADE IA - Cases with significant interstitial infiltration (>25% of parenchyma affected) and foci of moderate tubulitis (>4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells).

    GRADE IB - Cases with significant interstitial infiltration (>25% of parenchyma affected) and foci of moderate tubulitis (>10 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells).

    GRADE IIA - Cases with significant interstitial infiltration and mild to moderate intimal arteritis (v1).

    GRADE IIB - Cases with moderate to severe intimal arteritis comprising >25% of the luminal area (v2).

    GRADE III - Cases with "transmural" arteritis or fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells (v3).

    "Borderline" category is used when no intimal arteritis is present, but there are foci of mild tubulitis (1 to 4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section).

  9. Number of Participants With Sub Clinical Acute Rejection (36 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: At Month 36

    Based on Banff 97 criteria, sub clinical acute rejection can be:

    GRADE IA - Cases with significant interstitial infiltration (>25% of parenchyma affected) and foci of moderate tubulitis (>4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells).

    GRADE IB - Cases with significant interstitial infiltration (>25% of parenchyma affected) and foci of moderate tubulitis (>10 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells).

    GRADE IIA - Cases with significant interstitial infiltration and mild to moderate intimal arteritis (v1).

    GRADE IIB - Cases with moderate to severe intimal arteritis comprising >25% of the luminal area (v2).

    GRADE III - Cases with "transmural" arteritis or fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells (v3).

    "Borderline' category is used when no intimal arteritis is present, but there are foci of mild tubulitis (1 to 4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section).

  10. Mean Serum Creatinine (12 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: At Month 12

  11. Mean Serum Creatinine (36 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: At Month 12, 18, 24 and 36

  12. Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) Calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault Formula (12 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: At Month 12

    Creatinine clearance were calculated according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula:

    CrCl (males) = (140-A) × BW/(72 × Cr) CrCl (females) = CrCl (males) × 0.85 where A is age [years], BW is body weight [kg], and Cr is the serum concentration of creatinine [mg/dL].

    The Cockcroft-Gault formula estimates creatinine clearance based on serum creatinine level, body weight, and age.

  13. Creatinine Clearance Calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault Formula (36 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: At Month 12, 24 and 36

    Creatinine clearance were calculated according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula:

    CrCl (males) = (140-A) × BW/(72 × Cr) CrCl (females) = CrCl (males) × 0.85 where A is age [years], BW is body weight [kg], and Cr is the serum concentration of creatinine [mg/dL].

    The Cockcroft-Gault formula estimates creatinine clearance based on serum creatinine level, body weight, and age.

  14. Mean Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio (ACR) as Measurement of Proteinuria (12 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: At Month 12

    Proteinuria is measured by spot morning urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio [ACR]. When the ACR is more than or equal to 30 mg/mmol then it is known as proteinuria.

  15. Mean Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio [ACR] as Measurement of Proteinuria (36 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: At Month 12, 18, 24 and 36

    Proteinuria is measured by spot morning urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio [ACR]. When the ACR is more than or equal to 30 mg/mmol then it is known as proteinuria.

  16. Number of Participants With Post Transplant Diabetes Mellitus (PTDM) and Impaired Fasting Glucose (12 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: At Month 12

    The symptoms of post transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) and impaired fasting glucose are defined as any of the following conditions:

    • Patients receiving glucose lowering treatment
    • Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) >= 126 mg/dL on 2 separate occasions
    • Hemoglobin subtype A1c (HbA1c) > 6.5%
    • Diabetes reported as treatment emergent AE with end date > Day 15
  17. Number of Participants With New Onset Diabetes Mellitus After Transplantation (NODAT) and Impaired Fasting Glucose (36 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: At Month 36

    The symptoms of new onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT) and impaired fasting glucose are defined as any of the following conditions:

    • Patients receiving glucose lowering treatment
    • 2 fasting plasma glucose (FPG) values >= 126 mg/dL or 2 random plasma glucose (RPG) values >= 200 mg/dL or FPG value >= 126 mg/dL and 1 RPG value >= 200 mg/dL
    • Diabetes reported as treatment emergent AE with end date > Day 15
  18. Number of Participants With Notable Abnormal Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) as Measurement of Effect of Treatment on Cardiovascular Health (12 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: Baseline, Overall post-baseline up to 12 month

    Notable abnormal systolic blood pressure is defined as :

    • Either an increase of >=30 that results in >=180 or >200 (mm/Hg)
    • OR a decrease of >=30 that results in <=90 or <75 (mm/Hg)from baseline

    Notable abnormal diastolic blood pressure is defined as :

    • Either an increase of >=20 that results in >=105 or >115 (mm/Hg)
    • OR a decrease of >=20 that results in <=50 or <40 (mm/Hg) from baseline
  19. Number of Participants With Notable Abnormal Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) as Measurement of Effect of Treatment on Cardiovascular Health (36 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: Baseline, Overall post baseline up to Month 36

    Notable abnormal systolic blood pressure is defined as :

    • Either an increase of >=30 that results in >=180 or >200 (mm/Hg)
    • OR a decrease of >=30 that results in <=90 or <75 (mm/Hg) from baseline

    Notable abnormal diastolic blood pressure is defined as :

    • Either an increase of >=20 that results in >=105 or >115 (mm/Hg)
    • OR a decrease of >=20 that results in <=50 or <40 (mm/Hg) from baseline
  20. Number of Participants With Erythropoietin Usage (12 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: Month 12

  21. Number of Participants With Erythropoietin Usage (36 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: Month 36

  22. Mean Short-form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Score as a Measure of Quality of Life Assessment (12 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: At Month 12

    SF-36 measures impact of disease on overall quality of life (QoL). 36-item survey has 8 subscales. The 8 subscales are: Physical functioning (PF), Role-physical (RP), Bodily pain (BP), General health (GH), Vitality (VT), Social functioning (SF), Role-emotional (RE) and Mental health (MH).

    Score for eash sub-scale has been standardized with the use of norm-based methods based on assessment of the general U.S. population free of chronic conditions. Scores range from 1-100 with a mean=50 and a standard deviation=10. A higher score indicates less impact on QoL.

  23. Mean Short-form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Score as a Measure of Quality of Life Assessment (36 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: At Month 24

    SF-36 measures impact of disease on overall quality of life (QoL). 36-item survey has 8 subscales. The 8 subscales are : Physical functioning (PF), Role-physical (RP), Bodily pain (BP), General health (GH), Vitality (VT), Social functioning (SF), Role-emotional (RE) and Mental health (MH).

    Score for each sub-scale has been standardized with the use of norm-based methods based on assessment of the general U.S. population free of chronic conditions. Scores range from 1-100 with a mean=50 and a standard deviation=10. A higher score indicates less impact on QoL.

  24. Number of Participants Hospitalized for Reasons Other Than Primary Transplantation (12 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: Month 12

    This analysis is reporting number of participants hospitalized for reasons (such as acute rejection, infection, gastrointestinal (GI) events, cardiovascular event, metabolic disorder and Other) other than primary transplantation.

  25. Number of Participants Hospitalized for Reasons Other Than Primary Transplantation (36 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: Month 36

    This analysis is reporting number of participants hospitalized for reasons (such as acute rejection, infection, gastrointestinal (GI) events, cardiovascular event, metabolic disorder and Other) other than primary transplantation.

  26. Number of Participants With Employment Status (12 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: At screening (at day 0 +/- 7 days ), At Month 12

    The various employment status reported are:

    • Employed/self employed full time
    • Employed part time
    • Unemployed
    • Homemaker
    • Volunteer
    • Permanently disabled
    • Non-permanently disable
    • Retired
    • Other
  27. Number of Participants With Employment Status (36 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: At screening (at day 0 +/- 7 days ), At Month 36

    The various employment status reported are:

    • Employed/self employed full time
    • Employed part time
    • Unemployed
    • Homemaker
    • Volunteer
    • Permanently disabled
    • Non-permanently disable
    • Retired
    • Other
  28. Number of Participants With Wound Problems(12 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: At Month 12

    Patients with any wound healing problem such as infection related to kidney surgery, dehiscence, lymphocele, hernia, seroma, hematoma, ureteral anastomotic complication and other were reported in this analysis.

  29. Number of Participants With Any Wound Problems (36 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: At Month 12, 24 and 36

    Patients with any wound healing problem such as infection related to kidney surgery, dehiscence, lymphocele, hernia, seroma, hematoma, ureteral anastomotic complication and other were reported in this analysis.

  30. Number of Participants With Notable Abnormalities in Total Cholesterol and Triglycerides as Measurement of Effect of Treatment on Cardiovascular Health (12 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: Overall post baseline up to month 12

    Notable abnormal total cholesterol is defined as : High: >= 9.1 mmol/L , normal range is 0.00 - 5.17 mmol/L

    Notable abnormal triglycerides is defined as : High: >= 8.5 mmol/L, normal range is 0.30 - 2.00 mmol/L

  31. Number of Participants With Notable Abnormalities in Total Cholesterol and Triglycerides as Measurement of Effect of Treatment on Cardiovascular Health (36 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: Overall Post Baseline up to month 36

    Notable abnormal total cholesterol is defined as : High: >= 9.1 mmol/L , normal range is 0.00 - 5.17 mmol/L

    Notable abnormal triglycerides is defined as : High: >= 8.5 mmol/L, normal range is 0.30 - 2.00 mmol/L

  32. Number of Participants With Antibody-mediated Rejection Per Treatment Group (12 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: At Month 12

  33. Number of Participants With Antibody-mediated Rejection Per Treatment Group (36 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: At Month 12, 24 and 36

  34. Number of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) Influenced by Demographic Characteristics and Morbidities (12 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: At Month 12

    The influence of demographic characteristics and comorbidities on incidence of BPAR were analyzed in the following way: Demographic characteristics were age (<55 years, ≥55 years), Expanded criteria Donor (ECD) organ (donor age >60 years or donor non heart-beating and donor age >50), gender, living vs. deceased donor, Body Mass Index (BMI) classes (underweight <18.5, normal 18.5 - <25.0, overweight 25.0 - <30.0, obesity 30.0 and above), years on dialysis before transplantation (<1, 1-5, >5 years). Comorbidities were diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases/events, nephrosclerosis, glomerulonephritis/glomerular disease, polycystic disease, and Cytomegalovirus status.

  35. Number of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) Influenced by Demographic Characteristics and Morbidities (36 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: At Month 36

    The influence of demographic characteristics and comorbidities on incidence of BPAR were analyzed in the following way: Demographic characteristics were age (<55 years, ≥55 years), Expanded Criteria Donor [ECD] organ (donor age >60 years or donor non heart-beating and donor age >50), gender, living vs. deceased donor, Body Mass Index (BMI) classes (underweight <18.5, normal 18.5 - <25.0, overweight 25.0 - <30.0, obesity 30.0 and above), years on dialysis before transplantation (<1, 1-5, >5 years). Comorbidities were diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases/events, nephrosclerosis, glomerulonephritis/glomerular disease, polycystic disease, and Cytomegalovirus status.

  36. Number of Patient Survival and Graft Survival (12 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: At Month 12

  37. Number of Patient Survival and Graft Survival (36 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: At Month 12, 24 and 36

  38. Change in Bone Mineral Density Between Week 2 and Month 24 (36 Months Analysis)

    Time frame: Week 2, Month 24

    Measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) were done at Week 2 and Month 24. Change in BMD between week 2 and Month 24 were done for neck of femur and lumbar spine.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective, Open-label, Controlled Multicenter Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of an Induction Regimen of Cyclosporine Micro Emulsion, Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium (EC-MPS) and Corticosteroids, Followed by Administration of Everolimus and Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium (EC-MPS), With Either the Withdrawal of Cyclosporine Micro Emulsion or Corticosteroids in de Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients

Important dates

Study start
2006
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Sep 4, 2006
Registry last updated
Aug 19, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.