Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02250261

Socio-ecological Intervention to Promote Active Commuting to Work

Background Cycling and walking to work is a natural way of increasing physical activity in a working population. However, the evidence on the effectiveness and cost savings of promoting active work commuting (ACW) is thin. This cluster-randomized, controlled study aims to promote ACW with environmental, social and behavioral strategies in two large workplace areas in Tampere, Finland. The paper de-scribes the protocol, evaluation and baseline findings of the study.

Methods The enrollment of the workplaces took place in 2014-15. In Phase 1, the impacts of environmental strategies (improvements to the walking and cycling trails) were evaluated in Area1 including 11 workplaces. In Phase 2, five more workplaces were recruited from Area2 to evaluate the impacts of social and behavioral strategies accustomed for each workplace. The workplaces in both areas were then randomized into experimental (EXP, n=6+2) and comparison group (COM, n=5+3). EXP promoted ACW with social and behavioral strategies; COM participated in data collection only but will have the same support post-intervention. The primary outcome is the change in employees' self-reported and accelerometer-based ACW. The secondary outcomes include e.g. the changes in employees' self-rated health and subjective wellbeing at work, the change in the number of walkers and cyclists based on the traffic calculations and the change in the quality of walking and cycling trails based on camera auditing (Area1 only). External validity of the intervention is as-sessed with the compliance rates of the workplaces and employees as well as with the fidelity of the environmental, social and behavioral strategies. Health Economic Assessment Tool for Cycling and Walking (HEAT) is used to assess the cost savings of the multilevel intervention. In addition, environmental variables and types that promote ACW and mediate and moderate the effects of environmental strategies are examined.

Results and discussion This study is one of the first in Finland to combine interdisciplinary collaboration between practi-tioners and researchers working in the fields of transportation, urban design, physical activity and sustainable development to promote ACW. The findings benefit all stakeholders interested in pro-moting ACW in urban context. The study will also produce supportive material for promoting ACW at the workplaces.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

The UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Tampere, Pirkanmaa, Finland

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

All voluntary employees in the workplaces located in the specific area

Exclusion criteria

No exclusion criteria

Treatment and study plan

KÄPY

Behavioral

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in self-reported means of transportation to work

    Time frame: 1 year

    Proportion of employees walking or cycling to work (%)

  2. Change in self-reported weekly AWC

    Time frame: 1 year

    Mean number of days employees walk or cycle to work

  3. Change in accelerometer-based daily duration of walking and cycling to work

    Time frame: 1 year

    Daily minutes of AWC (mean)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in self-rated health

    Time frame: 1 year

    Employees self-reported health

  2. Change in subjective well-being at work

    Time frame: 1 year

    Includes six indicators self-reported by the employees

  3. Change in restrictions to ACW

    Time frame: 1 year

    Self-reported by the employees and grouped into four levels

  4. Change in motivation for ACW

    Time frame: 1 year

    Includes six indicators self-reported by the employees

  5. Change in injuries due to ACW

    Time frame: 1 year

    Self-reported by the employees

  6. Change in the use of the main walking and cycling trail (Area1)

    Time frame: 1 year

    Measured with fixed-point traffic calculations

  7. Change in the quality of the main walking and cycling trail

    Time frame: 1 year

    Audited by cycling the trails with GPS

Other outcomes

  1. Cost-savings

    Time frame: 1 year

    HEAT

  2. Cost-effectiveness

    Time frame: 1 year

    cost-effectiveness ratio

  3. Environmental evaluation

    Time frame: 1 year

    Urban environmental variables and types

  4. Environmental evaluation

    Time frame: 1 year

    Variables, which mediate and moderate the effects of environmental strategies

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

UKK Institute

Other

Collaborators

  • Department of Transport and Streets, City of Tampere
  • Ecofellows Ltd, City of Tampere
  • Tampere University of Technology
  • University of Graz
  • University of Oxford

Registry information

Acronym: KÄPY

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Sep 26, 2014
Registry last updated
Oct 9, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.