Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04617288

SNAGs in Mechanical Neck Pain

Neck pain is second largest cause of disability worldwide. Chronic neck pain prevalence is 14% which is somewhat higher in females as compared to males. In India reported prevalence is 6%. Therapeutically, neck pain is managed by physiotherapists using rest, stretching and strengthening exercises, educating patient, and intense proprioception and positional exercises.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

25 year–45 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

To determine the evidences for the efficacy of SNAGs in the Management of Mechanical Neck Pain.

100 patients [Age group 25-45 yrs] who were diagnosed with neck pain, with onset ˃1-3 months (chronic) were randomly assigned to group A receiving conventional Physiotherapy plus SNAGs and group B receiving conventional Physiotherapy plus ultrasound.

Subjects in-group A that received conventional Physiotherapy plus SNAGs showed greater Improvement in pain and range of motion compared with the conventional Physiotherapy plus ultrasound group on 2nd week compared with pretreatment.

The result of study suggests that both SNAGs and Ultrasound groups improves the symptoms of neck pain. Ultrasound group improved the pain symptoms but was too small to reach satisfactory outcome for patients. Based on these results conventional Physiotherapy plus SNAGs should be the treatment of choice for neck pain rather than conventional Physiotherapy plus Ultrasound .

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age group between 20- 45 years.
  • Both Gender male and female.
  • Individuals having localized pain or stiffness in spine or both combined b/w C3 to C7 without upper limbs radiculopathy.
  • Pain reported on VAS score ˃3 in neck region.
  • Patients agree to sign written consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Patients were excluded if they were diagnosed with following conditions for ˃6 months:

  • T.B, carcinoma, heart disease, osteoporosis.
  • Neural disorders due to PIVD.
  • Any trauma or localized infection in neck region.
  • Upper MND, cervical stenosis, metabolic diseases in bone and joint.
  • Hyper flexibility
  • Open sores,
  • Ongoing radiotherapy, chemotherapy, steroid therapy or anticoagulants.
  • Psychiatric diseases such as phobia/obsession, depression.
  • Allergy to hot pack
  • Patients with history of surgery in cervical spine region with in a year.

Treatment and study plan

Ultrasound Therapy, SNAGs

Other

Other names: Hot Pack, Exercise

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual analog scale

    Time frame: 2 weeks

    Visual analog scale is a subjective outcome measurement where patients judge the intensity of their pain on a scale of 0-10, which is in the form of a 10cm straight line. On this 0-10 scale, zero denotes no pain and ten denotes severe pain intensity.

  2. Neck Range of motion

    Time frame: 2 weeks

    Range of motion of the cervical spine measured by bubble inclinometer. It consists of a 360-degree scale with a fluid filled circular tube containing a small air bubble. It is a gravity dependent Goniometer, which uses the gravity's effect on fluid level to measure joint position and motion.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Neck disability Index

    Time frame: 2 weeks

    Neck disability Index contains 10 items, seven related to activities of daily living, two related to pain, and one item related to concentration. Each item is scored ranging from 0 (no pain or disability) to 5 (severe pain and disability); and the total score is expressed as a percentage, with higher scores corresponding to greater disability.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Raj Nursing and Paramedical College

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Efficacy of SNAGs in the Management of Mechanical Neck Pain

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Nov 5, 2020
Registry last updated
Nov 9, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.