Shanghai Chest Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200000, China
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Xinghua Cheng, M.D., Ph.D.
CONTACT
86+17701681215
Zhebing Lin, M.D.
CONTACT
86+18957727196
NCT Number: NCT07135856
The goal of this observational, retrospective, multicenter cohort study is to evaluate the surgical and oncologic outcomes of sleeve lobectomy performed via minimally invasive (RATS/VATS) or open thoracotomy approaches in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have undergone neoadjuvant therapy, including chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or combination regimens. The main questions this study aims to answer are:
* Does minimally invasive sleeve lobectomy result in comparable or improved perioperative and postoperative outcomes compared to open thoracotomy following neoadjuvant treatment in NSCLC? * Does surgical approach influence oncologic endpoints such as margin status, lymph node dissection, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival? This research addresses a critical gap in the thoracic oncology field by evaluating the safety, complexity, and efficacy of advanced surgical techniques in the context of evolving multimodal therapy paradigm. Findings may inform clinical decision-making and optimize patient selection in an era of increasing use of neoadjuvant strategies for resectable NSCLC.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200000, China
Location status: Recruiting
Xinghua Cheng, M.D., Ph.D.
CONTACT
86+17701681215
Zhebing Lin, M.D.
CONTACT
86+18957727196
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: 3 years
In this study, the investigators will focus on the 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) of the participants between the two groups (open vs. MIS) for the comparison of the long-term oncologic outcomes, as the primary outcome.
Time frame: 3 years
The investigators will also focus on the 3-year overall survival (OS) of the participants between the two groups (open vs. MIS) for the comparison of the long-term oncologic outcomes, as the secondary outcome.
Time frame: up to 90 days
The intraoperative bleeding will be investigated between open versus MIS sleeve lobectomy as one of the perioperative outcomes, measured in milliliter (mL).
Time frame: up to 90 days
The surgery duration will be investigated between open versus MIS sleeve lobectomy as one of the perioperative outcomes, measured in minute (min).
Time frame: up to 90 days
The postoperative hospital stay will be investigated between open versus MIS sleeve lobectomy as one of the perioperative outcomes, measured in day.
Time frame: up to 90 days
The postoperative complications will be investigated between open versus MIS sleeve lobectomy as one of the perioperative outcomes, showed in the number of the participants who occurred postoperative complications (n).
Time frame: up to 90 days
The perioperative mortality will be investigated between open versus MIS sleeve lobectomy as one of the perioperative outcomes, showed in the number of the participants who died within 90 days of surgery (n).
Time frame: up to 90 days
The number of dissected lymph nodes will be investigated between open versus MIS sleeve lobectomy as one of the perioperative outcomes (n).
Time frame: up to 90 days
The number of dissected lymph node stations will be investigated between open versus MIS sleeve lobectomy as one of the perioperative outcomes (n).
Time frame: up to 90 days
The margin status will be investigated between open versus MIS sleeve lobectomy as one of the perioperative outcomes, showed in the number of the participants who had the positive or negative surgical margins (n).
Time frame: up to 90 days
The postoperative ICU length stay will be investigating between open versus MlS sleeve lobectomy as one of the perioperative outcomes, measured in days. If no ICU admission occurs, length of stay is recorded as 0 days.
Time frame: up to 90 days
The postoperative chest tube drainage duration will be investigating between open versus MlS sleeve lobectomy as one of the perioperative outcomes, measured in days.
Time frame: up to 90 days
The postoperative pain scale will be investigating between open versus MlS sleeve lobectomy as one of the perioperative outcomes, measured with the Numeric Rating Scale (0-10) on postoperative days 1 and 2, and highest score during hospitalization.
Time frame: at surgery
The conversion rate from minimally invasive (VATS or RATS) cases to open thoracotomy will be showed in numbers.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Xinghua Cheng, M.D., Ph.D.
CONTACT
86+17701681215
Zhebing Lin, M.D.
CONTACT
86+18957727196
Shanghai Chest Hospital
Other
Comparative Analysis of Minimally Invasive and Open Sleeve Lobectomy Following Neoadjuvant Therapy in NSCLC: A Multicenter Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06540196
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06410300
Lung Cancer, Lung Diseases
Columbia, Missouri, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01441089
Adnexal Diseases, Breast Cancer
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00034216
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details