Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02063737

SleepTrackTXT Feasibility and Pilot Study

Aim 1: To determine if real-time assessments of perceived sleepiness and fatigue using text-messaging impacts an emergency medicine clinician's Attitudes, Perceived Norms, Self-Efficacy, Alertness Habits, Perceived Importance of Fatigue, Knowledge of Sleepiness/Fatigue, and Perceptions of Environmental Constraints regarding behaviors that can improve alertness during shift work.

Aim 2: To determine if text-messaging emergency care workers fatigue-reduction strategies in real-time at the start and during shift work reduces worker perceived sleepiness and fatigue at the end of shift work.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Early Phase 1

Primary location

University of Pittsburgh Department of Emergency Medicine School of Medicine

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15260, United States

About this study

More than half (55%) of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) shift workers report severe mental and physical fatigue while at work,(Patterson et al, 2012) 36% report excessive daytime sleepiness,(Pirrallo et al; 2012) and 60% poor sleep quality.(Patterson et al; 2012) Sleepiness or fatigue while on duty can result in injuries to EMS workers and medical errors for patients.(Patterson et al; 2012) The investigators' recent research shows that odds of injury among fatigued EMS workers are 1.9 times higher than non-fatigued workers.(Patterson et al; 2012) Additional data show that other emergency workers (e.g., emergency physicians and nurses) are vulnerable to sleepiness and fatigue while at work.(Fisman et al; 2007; Machi et al; 2012; Thomas et al; 2006; Geiger-Brown et al; 2012).

There are a number of individual and system factors that influence sleepiness and fatigue during shift work for emergency workers. Individual factors include sleep hygiene, medical conditions like obstructive sleep apnea, and other factors.(Schaefer et al; 2012; Simon et al; 2012) System factors include shift length, patient care intensity, and workload. Many factors are modifiable, yet some are more difficult than others to change or control. Reducing shift length and customary patterns of shift work, such as 12-hr and 24-hr shifts, is not feasible for many employers and shift workers in the emergency medicine care setting. In some locations, >80% of EMS workers hold multiple jobs, 40% work more than 16 shifts per month, and many accumulate unsafe amounts of overtime in order to make a livable wage.(Patterson et al, 2010; Patterson et al, 2012; Bauder 2012) Other shift workers in emergency care settings face the same or similar obstacles as do EMS shift workers.

An objective of this research study is to pilot test real-time assessment of emergency care worker sleepiness and fatigue. The investigators seek to determine if text-messaging fatigue-reduction strategies to emergency care workers that report a high-level of sleepiness or fatigue at the start or during their shift reduces perceived sleepiness or fatigue at the end of shift. A long term goal of this research is to determine if this innovative text-messaging tool can be used to reduce the likelihood of fatigue-related injury among emergency care shift workers.

Aim 1: To determine if real-time assessments of perceived sleepiness and fatigue using text-messaging impacts a worker's Attitudes, Perceived Norms, Self-Efficacy, Alertness Habits, Perceived Importance of Fatigue, Knowledge of Sleepiness/Fatigue, and Perceptions of Environmental Constraints regarding behaviors that can improve alertness during shift work.

Rationale: The investigators recognize that emergency care shift workers hold different beliefs and attitudes about the risk of sleepiness and fatigue on duty and are at different stages of adopting risk-reduction behaviors. Behavioral research shows that modifying one or more of these factors can impact future behavior and potentially reduce risk over the long term. Approach: The investigators have developed a list of candidate items that operationalize the Integrative Model of Behavioral Prediction. The investigators will administer these candidate items at baseline and again at the end of the study period to assess impact.

Aim 2: To determine if text-messaging emergency care workers fatigue-reduction strategies in real-time at the start and during shift work reduces worker perceived sleepiness and fatigue at the end of shift work.

Approach: At baseline, the investigators will randomly assign 100 emergency care workers to one of two groups (the control group or intervention group). The control group (n=50 / 50%) will receive standard text-message questions of sleepiness and fatigue at the beginning, during, and end of shift. The other 50% (n=50) will be assigned to our intervention group and receive the same text-message questions as the control group, as well as additional text-messages that include strategies that the investigators hypothesize will lead to a reduction in perceived sleepiness or fatigue at the end of shift work. With 100 EMS workers (50% intervention / 50% control), the investigators have 80% power to detect a difference (effect size of 0.78) in the self-reported fatigue levels reported at the end of shift by the control and intervention groups. The investigators will collect data over a 90-day study period.

Eligibility Criteria include:

  • The study subject must be 18 years of age or older;
  • The study subject must currently work in the emergency medicine setting as an emergency physician, emergency nurse, or emergency medical technician (EMT) / paramedic worker;
  • The study subject must work shifts as part of your employment in the emergency medicine setting;
  • The study subject must have a cell-phone / smartphone that can receive and send text-messages;
  • The study subject must be willing to take part in a research study where he/she is required to send and receive multiple text-messages at the start, during, and end of scheduled shift work?

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Are 18 years of age or older;
  • Currently work in the emergency medicine setting as an emergency physician, emergency nurse, or emergency medical technician (EMT) / paramedic worker;
  • Currently working shifts as part of your employment in the emergency medicine setting;
  • Have a cell-phone / smartphone that can receive and send text-messages;
  • Willing to take part in a research study where you are required to send and receive multiple text-messages at the start, during, and end of your shift work?

Exclusion criteria

1: Those that do not meet inclusion criteria.

Treatment and study plan

Text-message assessments only

Behavioral

Text message assessments only. No intervention for high level fatigue.

Text-message interventions for high level fatigue

Behavioral

Intervention messages to promote alertness while on duty at work including activities. Additionally at the end of the shift, participants were queried on their adoption of the suggested activities and perception of the activities' effectiveness.

Primary outcomes

  1. Self-Reported Fatigue at End of Shift Work

    Time frame: At the end of scheduled work shifts during a 90 day study period

    Self-reported fatigue based on scale ranging from 0 (Not At All) to 5 (Very Much).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Attitude One Subscale of the Sleep Fatigue and Alertness Behavior (SFAB) Tool

    Time frame: Assessed at the end of 90-day study period

    Individual attitudes towards maintaining alertness and reducing fatigue at work. Scale ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a more positive/favorable attitude towards maintaining alertness and reducing fatigue while at work.

  2. Attitudes Two Subscale of the Sleep Fatigue and Alertness Behavior Tool

    Time frame: end of study at 90 day follow up

    Individual attitudes towards maintaining alertness and reducing fatigue at work on future shifts. Scale ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a more positive/favorable attitude towards maintaining alertness and reducing fatigue while at work.

  3. Normative Beliefs Scale One Subscale of the SFAB

    Time frame: end of study at 90 day follow up

    Belief of people's views if they thought you were sleepy and fighting the urge to sleep while at work. Scale ranges from 0 (strongly approve) to 100 (strongly disapprove). Higher scores indicate a person believes the social norms and beliefs of his/her social network possess a negative view of behaviors that places an individual at work while very sleepy or fatigued.

  4. Normative Beliefs Scale Two Subscale of the SFAB

    Time frame: end of study at 90 day follow up

    Belief of people's views if they thought you were very fatigued mentally or physically while at work. Scale ranges from 0 (strongly approve) to 100 (strongly disapprove). Higher scores indicate a person believes the social norms and beliefs of his/her social network possess a negative view of behaviors that places an individual at work while very sleepy or fatigued.

  5. Self Efficacy Subscale of the SFAB

    Time frame: end of study at 90 day follow up

    Degree of confidence from 0 (cannot do at all) to 100 (highly certain can do) for completing activities. Higher scores indicate the individual has a high-level of self-confidence he/she can perform select behaviors that may improve alertness and reduce feelings of sleepiness or fatigue while at work.

  6. Knowledge-one Subscale of SFAB

    Time frame: end of study at 90 day follow up

    Perception that fatigue and sleepiness at work increases risks to safety ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 100 (strongly agree). Higher scores indicate an individual has a high-level of awareness for the negative effects of sleepiness and fatigue while at work, that may be attributed to the acquisition of information, an increased understanding, or through experiences or education.

  7. Knowledge-two Subscale of the SFAB

    Time frame: end of study at 90 day follow up

    Perceived degree of evidence that fatigue and sleepiness at work increases risks to safety ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 100 (strongly agree). Higher scores indicate an individual has a high-level of awareness for the negative effects of sleepiness and fatigue while at work, that may be attributed to the acquisition of information, an increased understanding, or through experiences or education.

  8. Importance Subscale of SFAB

    Time frame: end of study at 90 day follow up

    Level of importance an individual places on the need to maintain alertness and reduce feelings of fatigue and/or sleepiness while at work ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 100 (strongly agree). Strongly agree (higher score) is associated with high level of importance (endorsement) placed on the need to maintain alertness and reduce feelings of fatigue while at work.

  9. Environmental Constraints One Subscale of the SFAB

    Time frame: end of study at 90 day follow up

    Degree of importance of employer based barriers that might limit ability to reduce feelings of fatigue and sleepiness while on duty. Scale ranges from 0 (not at all important) to 100 (very important). Higher scores indicate the individual perceives his/her employer's policies and organizational related procedures/protocols as factors that inhibit the individual's ability to engage in behaviors that can improve alertness and reduce feelings of sleepiness or fatigue while at work.

  10. Environmental Constraints Two Subscale of the SFAB

    Time frame: end of study at 90 day follow up

    Degree of importance of employer policies that might limit ability to reduce feelings of fatigue and sleepiness while on duty. Scale ranges from 0 (not at all important) to 100 (very important). Higher scores indicate the individual perceives his/her employer's policies and organizational related procedures/protocols as factors that inhibit the individual's ability to engage in behaviors that can improve alertness and reduce feelings of sleepiness or fatigue while at work.

  11. Environmental Constraints Three Subscale of the SFAB

    Time frame: end of study at 90 day follow up

    Degree of importance of personal/work-life barriers that might limit ability to reduce feelings of fatigue and sleepiness while on duty. Scale ranges from 0 (not at all important) to 100 (very important). Higher scores indicate the individual perceives his/her responsibilities unrelated to the organization as factors that inhibit the individual's ability to engage in behaviors that can improve alertness and reduce feelings of sleepiness or fatigue while at work

  12. Habits Subscale of the SFAB

    Time frame: end of study at the 90 day follow up

    Endorsement of behaviors that may promote improved alertness and reduced feelings of sleepiness or fatigue while at work ranging from 0 (strongly agree) to 100 (strongly disagree). Strongly agree (lower score) is associated with high level of endorsement of behaviors (habits) that promote improved alertness.

  13. Intentions Subscale of the SFAB

    Time frame: end of study at 90 day follow up

    An individual's intent to engage in behaviors that may promote improved alertness and reduced feelings of sleepiness or fatigue while at work with higher scores indicating greater intent. Range is 0 (strongly agree) to 100 (strongly disagree).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Pittsburgh

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Sleep Track Text Pilot Trial in Emergency Care Clinicians

Acronym: SleepTrackTXT

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Feb 14, 2014
Registry last updated
Aug 5, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.