University of Pittsburgh Department of Emergency Medicine School of Medicine
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15260, United States
NCT Number: NCT02063737
Aim 1: To determine if real-time assessments of perceived sleepiness and fatigue using text-messaging impacts an emergency medicine clinician's Attitudes, Perceived Norms, Self-Efficacy, Alertness Habits, Perceived Importance of Fatigue, Knowledge of Sleepiness/Fatigue, and Perceptions of Environmental Constraints regarding behaviors that can improve alertness during shift work.
Aim 2: To determine if text-messaging emergency care workers fatigue-reduction strategies in real-time at the start and during shift work reduces worker perceived sleepiness and fatigue at the end of shift work.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Early Phase 1
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15260, United States
More than half (55%) of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) shift workers report severe mental and physical fatigue while at work,(Patterson et al, 2012) 36% report excessive daytime sleepiness,(Pirrallo et al; 2012) and 60% poor sleep quality.(Patterson et al; 2012) Sleepiness or fatigue while on duty can result in injuries to EMS workers and medical errors for patients.(Patterson et al; 2012) The investigators' recent research shows that odds of injury among fatigued EMS workers are 1.9 times higher than non-fatigued workers.(Patterson et al; 2012) Additional data show that other emergency workers (e.g., emergency physicians and nurses) are vulnerable to sleepiness and fatigue while at work.(Fisman et al; 2007; Machi et al; 2012; Thomas et al; 2006; Geiger-Brown et al; 2012).
There are a number of individual and system factors that influence sleepiness and fatigue during shift work for emergency workers. Individual factors include sleep hygiene, medical conditions like obstructive sleep apnea, and other factors.(Schaefer et al; 2012; Simon et al; 2012) System factors include shift length, patient care intensity, and workload. Many factors are modifiable, yet some are more difficult than others to change or control. Reducing shift length and customary patterns of shift work, such as 12-hr and 24-hr shifts, is not feasible for many employers and shift workers in the emergency medicine care setting. In some locations, >80% of EMS workers hold multiple jobs, 40% work more than 16 shifts per month, and many accumulate unsafe amounts of overtime in order to make a livable wage.(Patterson et al, 2010; Patterson et al, 2012; Bauder 2012) Other shift workers in emergency care settings face the same or similar obstacles as do EMS shift workers.
An objective of this research study is to pilot test real-time assessment of emergency care worker sleepiness and fatigue. The investigators seek to determine if text-messaging fatigue-reduction strategies to emergency care workers that report a high-level of sleepiness or fatigue at the start or during their shift reduces perceived sleepiness or fatigue at the end of shift. A long term goal of this research is to determine if this innovative text-messaging tool can be used to reduce the likelihood of fatigue-related injury among emergency care shift workers.
Aim 1: To determine if real-time assessments of perceived sleepiness and fatigue using text-messaging impacts a worker's Attitudes, Perceived Norms, Self-Efficacy, Alertness Habits, Perceived Importance of Fatigue, Knowledge of Sleepiness/Fatigue, and Perceptions of Environmental Constraints regarding behaviors that can improve alertness during shift work.
Rationale: The investigators recognize that emergency care shift workers hold different beliefs and attitudes about the risk of sleepiness and fatigue on duty and are at different stages of adopting risk-reduction behaviors. Behavioral research shows that modifying one or more of these factors can impact future behavior and potentially reduce risk over the long term. Approach: The investigators have developed a list of candidate items that operationalize the Integrative Model of Behavioral Prediction. The investigators will administer these candidate items at baseline and again at the end of the study period to assess impact.
Aim 2: To determine if text-messaging emergency care workers fatigue-reduction strategies in real-time at the start and during shift work reduces worker perceived sleepiness and fatigue at the end of shift work.
Approach: At baseline, the investigators will randomly assign 100 emergency care workers to one of two groups (the control group or intervention group). The control group (n=50 / 50%) will receive standard text-message questions of sleepiness and fatigue at the beginning, during, and end of shift. The other 50% (n=50) will be assigned to our intervention group and receive the same text-message questions as the control group, as well as additional text-messages that include strategies that the investigators hypothesize will lead to a reduction in perceived sleepiness or fatigue at the end of shift work. With 100 EMS workers (50% intervention / 50% control), the investigators have 80% power to detect a difference (effect size of 0.78) in the self-reported fatigue levels reported at the end of shift by the control and intervention groups. The investigators will collect data over a 90-day study period.
Eligibility Criteria include:
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
1: Those that do not meet inclusion criteria.
Text message assessments only. No intervention for high level fatigue.
Intervention messages to promote alertness while on duty at work including activities. Additionally at the end of the shift, participants were queried on their adoption of the suggested activities and perception of the activities' effectiveness.
Time frame: At the end of scheduled work shifts during a 90 day study period
Self-reported fatigue based on scale ranging from 0 (Not At All) to 5 (Very Much).
Time frame: Assessed at the end of 90-day study period
Individual attitudes towards maintaining alertness and reducing fatigue at work. Scale ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a more positive/favorable attitude towards maintaining alertness and reducing fatigue while at work.
Time frame: end of study at 90 day follow up
Individual attitudes towards maintaining alertness and reducing fatigue at work on future shifts. Scale ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a more positive/favorable attitude towards maintaining alertness and reducing fatigue while at work.
Time frame: end of study at 90 day follow up
Belief of people's views if they thought you were sleepy and fighting the urge to sleep while at work. Scale ranges from 0 (strongly approve) to 100 (strongly disapprove). Higher scores indicate a person believes the social norms and beliefs of his/her social network possess a negative view of behaviors that places an individual at work while very sleepy or fatigued.
Time frame: end of study at 90 day follow up
Belief of people's views if they thought you were very fatigued mentally or physically while at work. Scale ranges from 0 (strongly approve) to 100 (strongly disapprove). Higher scores indicate a person believes the social norms and beliefs of his/her social network possess a negative view of behaviors that places an individual at work while very sleepy or fatigued.
Time frame: end of study at 90 day follow up
Degree of confidence from 0 (cannot do at all) to 100 (highly certain can do) for completing activities. Higher scores indicate the individual has a high-level of self-confidence he/she can perform select behaviors that may improve alertness and reduce feelings of sleepiness or fatigue while at work.
Time frame: end of study at 90 day follow up
Perception that fatigue and sleepiness at work increases risks to safety ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 100 (strongly agree). Higher scores indicate an individual has a high-level of awareness for the negative effects of sleepiness and fatigue while at work, that may be attributed to the acquisition of information, an increased understanding, or through experiences or education.
Time frame: end of study at 90 day follow up
Perceived degree of evidence that fatigue and sleepiness at work increases risks to safety ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 100 (strongly agree). Higher scores indicate an individual has a high-level of awareness for the negative effects of sleepiness and fatigue while at work, that may be attributed to the acquisition of information, an increased understanding, or through experiences or education.
Time frame: end of study at 90 day follow up
Level of importance an individual places on the need to maintain alertness and reduce feelings of fatigue and/or sleepiness while at work ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 100 (strongly agree). Strongly agree (higher score) is associated with high level of importance (endorsement) placed on the need to maintain alertness and reduce feelings of fatigue while at work.
Time frame: end of study at 90 day follow up
Degree of importance of employer based barriers that might limit ability to reduce feelings of fatigue and sleepiness while on duty. Scale ranges from 0 (not at all important) to 100 (very important). Higher scores indicate the individual perceives his/her employer's policies and organizational related procedures/protocols as factors that inhibit the individual's ability to engage in behaviors that can improve alertness and reduce feelings of sleepiness or fatigue while at work.
Time frame: end of study at 90 day follow up
Degree of importance of employer policies that might limit ability to reduce feelings of fatigue and sleepiness while on duty. Scale ranges from 0 (not at all important) to 100 (very important). Higher scores indicate the individual perceives his/her employer's policies and organizational related procedures/protocols as factors that inhibit the individual's ability to engage in behaviors that can improve alertness and reduce feelings of sleepiness or fatigue while at work.
Time frame: end of study at 90 day follow up
Degree of importance of personal/work-life barriers that might limit ability to reduce feelings of fatigue and sleepiness while on duty. Scale ranges from 0 (not at all important) to 100 (very important). Higher scores indicate the individual perceives his/her responsibilities unrelated to the organization as factors that inhibit the individual's ability to engage in behaviors that can improve alertness and reduce feelings of sleepiness or fatigue while at work
Time frame: end of study at the 90 day follow up
Endorsement of behaviors that may promote improved alertness and reduced feelings of sleepiness or fatigue while at work ranging from 0 (strongly agree) to 100 (strongly disagree). Strongly agree (lower score) is associated with high level of endorsement of behaviors (habits) that promote improved alertness.
Time frame: end of study at 90 day follow up
An individual's intent to engage in behaviors that may promote improved alertness and reduced feelings of sleepiness or fatigue while at work with higher scores indicating greater intent. Range is 0 (strongly agree) to 100 (strongly disagree).
University of Pittsburgh
Other
The Sleep Track Text Pilot Trial in Emergency Care Clinicians
Acronym: SleepTrackTXT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07089342
Drowsiness, Fatigue
Brussels, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT06039358
Behavior, Biomechanics
Vic, Barcelona., Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT05464342
Behavior, Behavior, Animal
Nicosia, Cyprus
View Trial DetailsNCT02088593
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Buffalo, New York, United States
View Trial Details