Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades
Paris, 75015, France
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Brigitte Fauroux, MD, PhD
CONTACT
1 71 19 60 92 ext. +33
Lucie Griffon, MD
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
Mathilde Cozzo, MSc
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT04971850
One of main problems in the management of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in children and young adults is their screening, and the absence or the weak correlation between clinical symptoms and polysomnography (PSG). It may be useful to use additional measures together with PSG to improve the detection and characterization of respiratory events during sleep and/or correlation with clinical signs of SDB.
The primary objective of the study is to determine whether psychological and neuropsychological test scores correlate with diagnostic PSG results.
Interested in participating?
Request Info1 year–20 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Paris, 75015, France
Location status: Recruiting
Brigitte Fauroux, MD, PhD
CONTACT
1 71 19 60 92 ext. +33
Lucie Griffon, MD
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
Mathilde Cozzo, MSc
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
One of main problems in the management of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in children and young adults is their screening, and the absence or the weak correlation between clinical symptoms and polysomnography (PSG). It may be useful to use additional measures together with PSG to improve the detection and characterization of respiratory events during sleep and/or correlation with clinical signs of SDB.
In addition, the clinical impact of SDB and the benefit of treatment are still not clear in children and young adults, including neurocognitive and developmental perspective.
Finally, the validation of simplified tools could optimize and simplify the detection of SDB in children and young adults.
Patients scheduled to perform a diagnostic PSG for routine clinical care will have additional recordings and questionnaires as part of the study.
The primary objective of the study is to determine whether psychological and neuropsychological test scores correlate with diagnostic PSG results.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Procedures added by research during PSG :
Time frame: The day after the P(S)G
Anxiety questionnaire using the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale (RCMAS), with an anxiety being defined by a total T-score ≥60. Mean normal value of T-score is 50 ± 10.
Time frame: The day after the P(S)G
Depression questionnaire using the Multiscore Depression Inventory for Children (MDI-C), with an abnormal score being defined by a T-score ≥70. Mean normal value of T-score is 50 ± 10.
Time frame: The day after the P(S)G
Quality of life questionnaire using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL). The higher the score, the better the quality of life. Min value = 0. Max value = 100.
Time frame: The day after the P(S)G
Sensoriality using the Sensory profile test. Atypical performance for a raw score <122. Min value = 38. Max value = 190.
Time frame: The day after the P(S)G
Memory evaluation using the NEPSY-II test. Mean normal score is 10 ± 3. Abnormal for a score <4.
Time frame: The day after the P(S)G
Memory evaluation using the Children Memory Scale test. Mean normal score is 10 ± 3. Abnormal for a score <4.
Time frame: The day after the P(S)G
Attention evaluation using the TAP test. Abnormal for a T-score <30. Mean normal value of T-score is 50 ± 10.
Time frame: The day after the P(S)G
Executive function evaluation using the NEPSY-II. Mean normal score tests is 10 ± 3, abnormal for a score <4.
Time frame: The day after the P(S)G
Executive function evaluation using the Trail Making test. Mean normal score is 10 ± 3, abnormal for a score <4.
Time frame: The day after the P(S)G
Executive function evaluation using the KiTAP subtests. Abnormal T-score <30, with mean normal value of T-score is 50 ± 10.
Time frame: The day after the P(S)G
Behavior evaluation using the Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL). Abnormal T-score >65. Mean normal value of T-score is 50 ± 10.
Time frame: The day after the P(S)G
Neurodevelopment evaluation using the Griffiths-III. Mean normal score is 100 ± 15. Abnormal for a score <70.
Time frame: The day after the P(S)G
Neurodevelopment evaluation using the WPPSI-IV. Mean normal score is 100 ± 15. Abnormal for a score <70.
Time frame: The day after the P(S)G
Neurodevelopment evaluation using the WISC-V. Mean normal score is 100 ± 15. Abnormal for a score <70.
Time frame: The day after the P(S)G
Language evaluation using the Griffiths-III test. Mean normal score is 100 ± 15. Abnormal for a score <70.
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G
Score of the sleep disturbance scale for children (SDSC) to detect the presence and severity of SDB Children < 4 years old: Min value 3, max value 15. Abnormal if score >4. Children > 4 years old: Min value 5, max value 25. Abnormal if score >12.
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G
Geometric morphometric approach based on 3D facial surface analysis of linear distances between 25 pairs of craniofacial landmarks, defined as direct Euclidean distance (in mm) between the two points.
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G
Geometric morphometric approach based on 3D facial surface analysis of geodesic distances between 25 pairs of craniofacial landmarks, defined as the shortest distance (in mm) between two points when following the contour of the face/skin.
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G
Geometric morphometric approach based on 3D facial surface analysis of angular measurements between 25 pairs of craniofacial landmarks, defined as the angles (in degree) between sets of three landmarks.
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G and 1 year after the intervention/procedure/surgery
Comparison between the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) obtained from the P(S)G and the AHI calculated using respiratory muscle EMG
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G and 1 year after the intervention/procedure/surgery
Comparison between the AHI obtained from the P(S)G and the AHI calculated taking into account hypoventilation and flow limitation
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G and 1 year after the intervention/procedure/surgery
Comparison between the AHI obtained from the P(S)G and the AHI calculated taking into account autonomic arousals using the pulse wave amplitude
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G and 1 year after the intervention/procedure/surgery
Comparison between the AHI obtained from the P(S)G and the AHI calculated using the pulse transit time
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G and 1 year after the intervention/procedure/surgery
Comparison between the AHI obtained from the P(S)G and the AHI calculated using mandibular movements
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G and 1 year after the intervention/procedure/surgery
Comparison between the AHI obtained from the P(S)G and the AHI calculated using cerebral oxygenation desaturations
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G and 1 year after the intervention/procedure/surgery
Correlation between clinical signs by questionnaire and respiratory muscles power by EMG.
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G and 1 year after the intervention/procedure/surgery
Correlation between clinical signs by questionnaire and hypoventilation and flow limitation scores by P(S)G.
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G and 1 year after the intervention/procedure/surgery
Correlation between clinical signs by questionnaire and autonomic arousals using pulse wave amplitude by pulse oximetry.
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G and 1 year after the intervention/procedure/surgery
Correlation between clinical signs by questionnaire and pulse transit time analysis by ECG.
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G and 1 year after the intervention/procedure/surgery
Correlation between clinical signs by questionnaire and mandibular movement analysis by non-invasive magnetic distance sensors.
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G and 1 year after the intervention/procedure/surgery
Correlation between clinical signs by questionnaire and cerebral oxygenation analysis by near-infrared spectroscopy.
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G and 1 year after the intervention/procedure/surgery
Correlation between clinical signs by questionnaire and the type of CAP by EEG.
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G and 1 year after the intervention/procedure/surgery
Correlation between pulse oximetry and respiratory muscles power by EMG.
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G and 1 year after the intervention/procedure/surgery
Correlation between pulse oximetry and hypoventilation and flow limitation scores by P(S)G.
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G and 1 year after the intervention/procedure/surgery
Correlation between pulse oximetry and autonomic arousals using pulse wave amplitude.
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G and 1 year after the intervention/procedure/surgery
Correlation between pulse oximetry and pulse transit time analysis.
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G and 1 year after the intervention/procedure/surgery
Correlation between pulse oximetry and mandibular movement analysis by non-invasive magnetic distance sensors.
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G and 1 year after the intervention/procedure/surgery
Correlation between pulse oximetry and cerebral oxygenation analysis by near-infrared spectroscopy.
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G and 1 year after the intervention/procedure/surgery
Correlation between pulse oximetry and the type of CAP.
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G and 1 year after the intervention/procedure/surgery
Correlation between sleep questionnaires and respiratory muscles EMG.
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G and 1 year after the intervention/procedure/surgery
Correlation between sleep questionnaires and hypoventilation and flow limitation scores by P(S)G.
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G and 1 year after the intervention/procedure/surgery
Correlation between sleep questionnaires and autonomic arousals using pulse wave amplitude.
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G and 1 year after the intervention/procedure/surgery
Correlation between sleep questionnaires and pulse transit time analysis.
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G and 1 year after the intervention/procedure/surgery
Correlation between sleep questionnaires and mandibular movement analysis by non-invasive magnetic distance sensors.
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G and 1 year after the intervention/procedure/surgery
Correlation between sleep questionnaires and cerebral oxygenation analysis.
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G and 1 year after the intervention/procedure/surgery
Correlation between sleep questionnaires and the type of CAP.
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G and 1 year after the intervention/procedure/surgery
Correlation between psychological and neuropsychological scores and the different calculated AHI.
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G and 1 year after the intervention/procedure/surgery
Correlation between psychological and neuropsychological scores and the types of CAP.
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G and 1 year after the intervention/procedure/surgery
Correlation between psychological and mean nocturnal cerebral oxygenation.
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G
Correlation between the AHI obtained from P(S)G and the AHI obtained using respiratory inductance plethysmography.
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G
Correlations between sleep stages obtained from PSG and sleep stages from a sleep headband.
Time frame: The day after baseline P(S)G
Correlations between the sleep stages and AHI obtained from manual analysis of PSG and an automatic analysis.
Time frame: At one year
Comparison of neurodevelopment evaluation using the Griffiths-III between baseline and 1 year following treatment for severe or moderate-to-severe (pubescent patient) obstructive sleep apnea. Mean normal score is 100 ± 15. Abnormal for a score <70.
Time frame: At one year
Comparison of neurodevelopment evaluation using the WPPSI-IV between baseline and 1 year following treatment for severe or moderate-to-severe (pubescent patient) obstructive sleep apnea. Mean normal score is 100 ± 15. Abnormal for a score <70.
Time frame: At one year
Comparison of neurodevelopment evaluation using the WISC-V between baseline and 1 year following treatment for severe or moderate-to-severe (pubescent patient) obstructive sleep apnea. Mean normal score is 100 ± 15. Abnormal for a score <70.
Time frame: At one year
Comparison of the percentage of types of CAP between baseline and 1 year following treatment.
Time frame: At one year
Comparison of mean cerebral oxygenation between baseline and 1 year following treatment.
Time frame: At one year
Comparison of PSQI scores between baseline and 1 year following treatment. PSQI max score = 21. Threshold values for the PSQI scale: 0-4: Good, 5-8: Moderate, >9: Bad sleep quality.
Time frame: At one year
Comparison of ESS scores between baseline and 1 year following treatment. ESS max score = 33. Threshold values for the ESS scale: <8: No, 9-14: Moderate, >15: Severe sleepiness.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Brigitte Fauroux, MD, PhD
CONTACT
1 71 19 60 92 ext. +33
Hélène Morel
CONTACT
1 71 19 63 46 ext. +33
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Other
Acronym: TRSPed
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07332780
Apnea, Dyssomnias
Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07520656
Abnormalities, Multiple, Aortic Valve Disease
Athens, Attica, Greece
View Trial DetailsNCT07086742
Apnea, Dyssomnias
Genk, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT07077226
Apnea, Brain Damage, Chronic
Padova, PD, Italy
View Trial Details