Skhokho Supporting Success for Schools
BehavioralAll information describing each facet of the intervention are included in the arm/group descriptions.
NCT Number: NCT02349321
Development and evaluation of a multi-faceted school-based intervention to prevent intimate partner violence among Grade 8 high school students in South Africa
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Primary prevention of intimate partner violence among young men and women requires an intervention which addresses the underlying driving factors of such violence operating at different ecological levels.That is, interventions need to address factors impacting directly on youth and their family relationships, school as an institutional setting. In the school, holistic interventions strengthen the curriculum and teaching, but also the broader environment of learning, including addressing positive discipline and the culture of the school. In order to prevent violence, interventions need to build gender equality, challenge the normative use of violence in schools and homes (e.g., corporal punishment), strengthen teen-adult relationships and communication, and build negotiation and conflict resolution skills, as well as addressing stress and coping.
A three-arm, cluster randomised controlled trial based in high schools in Gauteng, South Africa is evaluating such a multi-faceted primary prevention intervention. This intervention includes school strengthening components for learners and educators, which includes providing a teaching materials for the grade 8 life orientation (LO) curriculum (which covers gender and violence), training teachers in LO teaching, training staff on positive discipline and establishing learner clubs. A second intervention seeks to strengthen families and is a workshop based intervention delivered over 4 day long sessions for a parent or caregiver and their grade 8 adolescent.
The intervention is being evaluated in a three arm randomised controlled trial, with school-level randomisation involving 24 schools. One is a delayed intervention control arm, two arms have the school strengthening intervention and one arm additionally have the family strengthening intervention.
The outcomes will be addressed using qualitative and quantitative methods with data collected from Grade 8 learners (the primary outcome group), school educators and administrators, and parents/caregivers of Grade 8s. These measures will be conducted pre-intervention and at 6, 12, and 18 month follow up periods. In addition, an economic costing evaluation will be conducted.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
NONE
All information describing each facet of the intervention are included in the arm/group descriptions.
All information describing each facet of the intervention are included in the arm/group descriptions.
Time frame: Over 18 months of the study
Any participant who responds affirmatively to any one of the five questions on physical intimate partner violence or one question on sexual intimate partner violence at the 6, 12 or 18 month data collection points will be deemed to be an incident case of IPV victimisation (if female) or perpetration (if male).
Time frame: Over the last 12 months of the study
Any participant who responds affirmatively to more than one of the five questions on physical intimate partner violence and/or one question on sexual intimate partner violence at the 12 or 18 month data collection points will be deemed to be an incident case of severe IPV victimisation (if female) or perpetration (if male).
Time frame: 18 month follow up
difference in scores derived through summing 5 questions
Time frame: 18 month follow up
Difference in scores derived through summing 15 items
Time frame: Over 18 months of the study
Any participant who responds affirmatively to any of the non-partner rape questions (2 for girls and 4 for boys) will be deemed to be an incident case of non-partner rape victimisation (if female) and perpetration (if male)
Time frame: 18 month follow up
Positive affirmation of teens and environment at home Emotional neglect Physical abuse Sexual abuse
Time frame: 18 month follow up
Comparison of scores across 3 items
Time frame: 18 month follow up
Difference in scores measured through summing responses to 5 items
Time frame: 18 months follow up
Any participant who responds affirmatively to any one of the three questions on emotional intimate partner violence at the 6, 12 or 18 month data collection points will be deemed to be an incident case of emotional IPV victimisation (if female) or perpetration (if male).
Time frame: 18-month follow up
Any participant who responds affirmatively to any one of five questions on delinquency at the 6, 12 or 18 months data collection points will be deemed to be an incident case of delinquency
Time frame: 18-month follow up
The difference in scores
Time frame: 18-month follow up
the difference in scores
Medical Research Council, South Africa
Other
Skhokho Supporting Success: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial of a Multi-faceted, School-based Intimate Partner Violence Primary Prevention Intervention in Gauteng, South Africa
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.