Standard angioplasty + drug-eluting balloon technique
ProcedureTreatment of restenosis of hemodialysis vascular access via the standard angioplasty + drug-eluting balloon technique
NCT Number: NCT06868901
A well-functioning hemodialysis vascular access is a decisive factor in the survival of hemodialysis patients, who have a high mortality rate. 85% of these hemodialysis patients, are treated via an arteriovenous fistula (AVF). However, the primary patency of AVFs at 1 year is 60%, mainly due to neointimal hyperplasia developing in the drainage vein, which leads to stenosis and, if left untreated, thrombosis of the AVF. Indeed, forty percent of hemodialysis patients require re-intervention on their vascular access within the year, due to stenosis on their AVF.
Transluminal angioplasty (TLA) is currently used as first-line treatment for these stenoses but TLA itself causes vascular damage, with early recurrence of the stenosis in 50% of cases at 6 months, and necessitating repeated interventions.
In recent years several endovascular techniques have been developed to limit the risk of re-stenosis, none of which have produced significantly better results than simple TLA. Eliminating intimal hyperplasia using a minimally invasive endovascular technique, rather than crushing it with simple angioplasty, would improve restenosis-free survival in these patients.
Today, endovascular rotational atherectomy techniques are available to improve the patency of angioplasty in the treatment of complex arterial lesions of the coronary arteries and lower limbs. The atherotome is a guide-mounted catheter with a small burr at its distal end, which resects the atheromatous plaque whereas angioplasty simply crushes it. Atherectomy is followed by drug-eluting balloon (DEB) angioplasty with paclitaxel release to limit restenosis through its anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative activity. A few cases of rotational atherectomy for the treatment of calcified stenoses in saphenous vein coronary bypasses have been reported in the literature, with encouraging results. If AVF re-stenosis should occur, the intimal hyperplasia can be removed endovascularly, thereby limiting the risk of short-term iterative stenosis.
The aim of this study was to compare the 6-month re-stenosis rate with this technique (atherectomy + drug-eluting balloon) versus standard angioplasty + drug-eluting balloon for the treatment of restenosis of hemodialysis vascular accesses.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
A well-functioning hemodialysis vascular access is a decisive factor in the survival of hemodialysis patients, who have a high mortality rate. 85% of these hemodialysis patients, are treated via an arteriovenous fistula (AVF), which is currently the access offering the best results in terms of patency and infectious risk. However, the primary patency of AVFs at 1 year is 60%, mainly due to the development of neointimal hyperplasia in the drainage vein, which leads to stenosis and, if left untreated, thrombosis of the AVF. Forty percent of hemodialysis patients on AVF will therefore have at least one intervention on their vascular access within the year, due to stenosis on their AVF.
Transluminal angioplasty (TLA) is currently used as first-line treatment for these stenoses. However, TLA itself causes vascular damage, with migration and myofibroblast proliferation responsible for abnormal vascular remodeling, leading to early recurrence of the stenosis in 50% of cases at 6 months, limiting the long-term functionality of these angioplasties and necessitating repeated interventions on these patients. For all these reasons, developing techniques to limit the risk of re-stenosis of hemodialysis AVFs is a public health issue.
In recent years several endovascular techniques have been developed to limit the risk of re-stenosis: paclitaxel-coated "active" balloon angioplasty, bare or covered stenting, none of which have produced significantly better results than simple TLA. Eliminating intimal hyperplasia using a minimally invasive endovascular technique, rather than crushing it with simple angioplasty, would improve restenosis-free survival in these patients, without increasing the burden of management.
Today, endovascular rotational atherectomy techniques are available to improve the patency of angioplasty in the treatment of complex arterial lesions of the coronary arteries and lower limbs. The atherotome is a guide-mounted catheter with a small burr at its distal end, which resects the atheromatous plaque where angioplasty simply crushes it. Atherectomy is followed by drug-eluting balloon angioplasty with paclitaxel release to limit restenosis through its anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative activity. A few cases of rotational atherectomy for the treatment of calcified stenoses in saphenous vein coronary bypasses have been reported in the literature, with encouraging results and the absence of complications, notably perforation. If AVF re-stenosis should occur, the intimal hyperplasia can be removed endovascularly, thereby limiting the risk of short-term iterative stenosis.
The aim of this study was to compare the 6-month re-stenosis rate with this technique (atherectomy + drug-eluting balloon) versus standard angioplasty + drug-eluting balloon for the treatment of restenosis of hemodialysis vascular accesses.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Treatment of restenosis of hemodialysis vascular access via the standard angioplasty + drug-eluting balloon technique
Treatment of restenosis of hemodialysis vascular access via the atherectomy + drug-eluting balloon technique
Time frame: At 6 months postoperative
YES/NO Significant restenosis is defined on echodoppler by a combination of > 50% venous lumen reduction with a systolic peak ratio > 2 associated with: i) either an internal residual diameter < 2 mm, ii) or a flow reduction > 25% or flow < 500 ml/min.
Time frame: At 6 months postoperative
YES/NO Significant restenosis is defined on echodoppler by a combination of > 50% venous lumen reduction with a systolic peak ratio > 2 associated with: i) either an internal residual diameter < 2 mm, ii) or a flow reduction > 25% or flow < 500 ml/min.
Time frame: Up to 6 months postoperative
Time (days) from surgery to onset of restenosis as defined above.
Time frame: Up to 6 months postoperative
Time (days) from surgery to onset of restenosis as defined above.
Time frame: Up to 6 months' follow-up.
Collection of complications related to surgical technique: perforation (assessed by the operator intraoperatively: extravasation of contrast medium at fistulographic control), false aneurysm (assessed at follow-up echodoppler).
Time frame: Up to 6 months' follow-up.
Collection of complications related to surgical technique: perforation (assessed by the operator intraoperatively: extravasation of contrast medium at fistulographic control), false aneurysm (assessed at follow-up echodoppler).
Time frame: At 1 month postoperative
Intermediate patency assessed by significant restenosis as defined above
Time frame: At 1 month postoperative
Intermediate patency assessed by significant restenosis as defined above
Time frame: At 3 months postoperative
Intermediate patency assessed by significant restenosis as defined above
Time frame: At 3 months postoperative
Intermediate patency assessed by significant restenosis as defined above
Time frame: At 3 months postoperative
Systolic velocity (ml/s) assessed by echodoppler
Time frame: At 3 months postoperative
Systolic velocity (ml/s) assessed by echodoppler
Time frame: At 6 months postoperative
Systolic velocity (ml/s) assessed by echodoppler
Time frame: At 6 months postoperative
Systolic velocity (ml/s) assessed by echodoppler
Time frame: At 1 month postoperative
Measurement of venous lumen as a percentage on echodoppler
Time frame: At 1 month postoperative
Measurement of venous lumen as a percentage on echodoppler
Time frame: At 3 months postoperative
Measurement of venous lumen as a percentage on echodoppler
Time frame: At 3 months postoperative
Measurement of venous lumen as a percentage on echodoppler
Time frame: At 6 months postoperative
Measurement of venous lumen as a percentage on echodoppler
Time frame: At 6 months postoperative
Measurement of venous lumen as a percentage on echodoppler
Time frame: Up to 6 months postoperative
Occurrence of re-intervention for thrombosis: yes/no.
Time frame: Up to 6 months postoperative
Occurrence of re-intervention for thrombosis: yes/no.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Anissa MEGZARI
CONTACT
Elsa FAURE, Dr.
CONTACT
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Other
Evaluation of the 6-month Response Rate According to Two Surgical Techniques (Rotational Atherectomy vs. Angioplasty) to Treat Stenosis of Vascular Accesses in Hemodialysis. A Single-center, Randomized, Single-blind, Superiority-controlled Pilot Study.
Acronym: ARSAV
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05410691
Arteriovenous Fistula, Arteriovenous Malformations
Singapore
View Trial DetailsNCT06683495
Chronic Pain, Fistula
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07720401
Bone Diseases, Chronic Disease
Isfahan, Iran
View Trial DetailsNCT07019610
Catheter Complications, Catheter Infection
Herston, Queensland, Australia
View Trial Details