Chu Nimes
Nîmes, 30029, France
NCT Number: NCT05235854
The main hypothesis of the study is that in situ infiltration of the meniscal lesion would provide patients with lasting and greater relief than intra-articular infiltration. A statistically significant difference would be if the Lysholm score of the meniscal wall group at 3 months is 9.5 points higher than that of the intra-articular infiltration group.
The aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of meniscal wall infiltration under ultrasound in the treatment of stable degenerative meniscal lesions versus intra-articular infiltration (Gold standard) at 3 months by Lysholm's algo-functional score.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Nîmes, 30029, France
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Diprostène® will be injected into the knee. This is a 1 ml syringe of Betamethasone 2 mg, suspension for injection in pre-filled syringe.
Time frame: 15 days before infiltration
The Lysholm score will be used to evaluate functionality 15 days before infiltration.The Lysholm Tegner score (Lysholm and Gillquist 1982) is a validated questionnaire for assessing knee functionality. The Lysholm score is rated from 0 to 100 (100 being the maximum functional score) and its repeatability is excellent (0.88 to 0.95). The scale has eight items: instability (/25), pain (/25), locking (/15), swelling (/10), stairs (/10), squatting (/5), limping (/5), use of a cane (/5). In 1985, Tegner added a scale of sports and occupational activity rated from 0 (occupational disability) to 10 (high level sport), hence the name Lysholm-Tegner score (Tegner and Lysholm 1985)
Time frame: 15 days before infiltration
The Lysholm score will be used to evaluate functionality 15 days before infiltration.The Lysholm Tegner score (Lysholm and Gillquist 1982) is a validated questionnaire for assessing knee functionality. The Lysholm score is rated from 0 to 100 (100 being the maximum functional score) and its repeatability is excellent (0.88 to 0.95). The scale has eight items: instability (/25), pain (/25), locking (/15), swelling (/10), stairs (/10), squatting (/5), limping (/5), use of a cane (/5). In 1985, Tegner added a scale of sports and occupational activity rated from 0 (occupational disability) to 10 (high level sport), hence the name Lysholm-Tegner score (Tegner and Lysholm 1985)
Time frame: 3 months after infiltration
The Lysholm score will be used to evaluate functionality 3 months after infiltration.The Lysholm Tegner score (Lysholm and Gillquist 1982) is a validated questionnaire for assessing knee functionality. The Lysholm score is rated from 0 to 100 (100 being the maximum functional score) and its repeatability is excellent (0.88 to 0.95). The scale has eight items: instability (/25), pain (/25), locking (/15), swelling (/10), stairs (/10), squatting (/5), limping (/5), use of a cane (/5). In 1985, Tegner added a scale of sports and occupational activity rated from 0 (occupational disability) to 10 (high level sport), hence the name Lysholm-Tegner score (Tegner and Lysholm 1985)
Time frame: 3 months after infiltration
The Lysholm score will be used to evaluate functionality 3 months after infiltration.The Lysholm Tegner score (Lysholm and Gillquist 1982) is a validated questionnaire for assessing knee functionality. The Lysholm score is rated from 0 to 100 (100 being the maximum functional score) and its repeatability is excellent (0.88 to 0.95). The scale has eight items: instability (/25), pain (/25), locking (/15), swelling (/10), stairs (/10), squatting (/5), limping (/5), use of a cane (/5). In 1985, Tegner added a scale of sports and occupational activity rated from 0 (occupational disability) to 10 (high level sport), hence the name Lysholm-Tegner score (Tegner and Lysholm 1985)
Time frame: 6 months after infiltration
Yes/No and, if so, the date of the arthroscopy will be recorded.
Time frame: 6 months after infiltration
Yes/No and, if so, the date of the arthroscopy will be recorded.
Time frame: 15 days before infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
Time frame: 1 week after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
Time frame: 2 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
Time frame: 3 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
Time frame: 4 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
Time frame: 5 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
Time frame: 6 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
Time frame: 7 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
Time frame: 8 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
Time frame: 9 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
Time frame: 10 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
Time frame: 11 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
Time frame: 12 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
Time frame: 15 days before infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
Time frame: 1 week after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
Time frame: 2 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
Time frame: 3 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
Time frame: 4 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
Time frame: 5 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
Time frame: 6 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
Time frame: 7 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
Time frame: 8 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
Time frame: 9 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
Time frame: 10 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
Time frame: 11 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
Time frame: 12 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
Time frame: Day 0 to Month 6
The number of days taken for the patient to return to physical activity
Time frame: Day 0 to Month 6
The number of days taken for the patient to return to physical activity
Time frame: Day 0 to 3 months after infiltration
Collection of all possible adverse events from D0 to M3. Qualitative
Time frame: Day 0 to 3 months after infiltration
Collection of all possible adverse events from D0 to M3. Qualitative
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Other
Evaluation of the Performance of Six-month Wall Infiltration Under Ultrasound to Treat Stable Degenerative Meniscal Injuries. A Single-center, Randomized, Double-blind Study.
Acronym: ECHOGUIDE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06693648
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Thousand Oaks, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07696195
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Hualien City, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT06459817
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Bologna, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT06622512
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
View Trial Details