Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT04475783

Sirolimus- vs. Paclitaxel-Drug Coated Ballons in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease

This study is a prospective, interventional, multi-center 1:1 randomized non-inferiority trial.

The trial evaluates the safety and efficacy of the Magic Touch PTA sirolimus drug-coated balloon in comparison to the treatment with PTX drug-coated balloon (control device) in patients with femoropopliteal artery disease.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Medical University Vienna, Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinische Abteilung für Angiologie, Vienna, State of Vienna, Austria

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), in which a balloon is advanced and inflated in the obstructed artery for several seconds to minutes, has become the standard endovascular treatment for peripheral arteries. The long-term success of bare balloon PTA in the fem-oropopliteal segment is hampered by the occurrence of restenosis, which can be reduced by local antiproliferative drug delivery via the PTA balloon catheter.

The rationale of this study is based on the hypothesis that the usage of the Sirolimus-coated Magic Touch Sirolimus DCB is at least equal (non-inferior) with regards to efficacy and safety in comparison with a clinically well-established PTX coated balloon.

The objective of this prospective, randomized, multi-center, post-market study is to compare the Magic Touch Sirolimus DCB with Paclitaxel-coated DCB for treatment of high grade ste-notic or occluded lesions in SFA and / or P1 segment of the popliteal artery (PA) in PAD pa-tients.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject age ≥ 18
  • Subject has been informed on the nature of the study, the duration of the study, agrees to attend follow-up visits, agrees to complete the required testing, agrees to participate, and has signed an informed consent form.
  • Rutherford category 2-4 according to the investigator's subjective evaluation
  • Subject has a de novo or re-stenosed lesion with ≥ 70 % stenosis documented angiographically
  • Target lesion length is ≥ 2 cm and ≤ 20 cm by visual estimate of the treating physician
  • Multiple lesions with max. 3 cm healthy vessel segment in between lesions can be considered at the discretion of the operator as one lesion. Total lesion length should not exceed 20 cm
  • Reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥ 4 mm and ≤ 6.5 mm by visual estimation
  • Patency of P2 and P3 segment of the popliteal artery and at least one (1) infrapopliteal artery to the ankle (< 50 % diameter stenosis) in continuity with the femoropopliteal artery
  • Patency of ipsilateral iliac artery (≤ 30% diameter stenosis). Iliac artery stenosis > 30 % may be treated during the index procedure to ensure sufficient inflow.
  • A guidewire has successfully traversed the target treatment segment intraluminal
  • Vascular disease in the opposite leg that requires treatment at the time point of index procedure is allowed, but has to be treated according to randomization or with POBA.
  • A patient can only be enrolled and randomized once with only one target lesion in the SIRONA trial. Please note that only the lesion in one limb can be treated as target lesion for index procedure.

Exclusion criteria

  • Failure to successfully cross the target lesion or subintimal target lesion guidewire crossing
  • Flow-limiting dissection after pre-dilatation
  • Angiographic evidence of severe calcification of the target vessel (contiguous calcification on both sides of the vessel)
  • Presence of fresh thrombus in the target lesion
  • Presence of aneurysm in the target vessel/s
  • Prior vascular surgery (including atherectomy, bypass surgery) of the target limb
  • Prior stent in the target lesion
  • Stroke or heart attack within 3 months prior to enrollment
  • Any vascular surgical procedure or intervention performed in the target limb within 30 days prior to or planned within 30 days post index procedure
  • Any vascular treatment with PTX or sirolimus-coated devices 60 days prior to index procedure
  • Target lesion requires treatment with alternative therapies such as primary stenting, laser, lithotripsy, thrombectomy, atherectomy, cryoplasty, brachytherapy, re-entry devices
  • Enrolled in another investigational drug, device or biologic study
  • Life expectancy of less than one year in the investigator's opinion
  • Known allergies or sensitivity to heparin, aspirin, other anticoagulant/ antiplatelet therapies, sirolimus, paclitaxel or contrast media that cannot be adequately pre-treated prior to index procedure
  • Significant gastrointestinal bleeding or any coagulopathy that would contraindicate the use of anti-platelet therapy
  • Receiving dialysis or immunosuppressant therapy
  • Pregnant or lactating females
  • History of major amputation in the same limb as the target lesion

Treatment and study plan

Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA)

Combination Product

PTA with an drug-coated balloon catheter (DCB) in the femoropopliteal artery

Primary outcomes

  1. Patency rate (Absence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization)

    Time frame: one year after study procedure (PTA with medical product under investigation or comparator)

    patency rate after one year defined as absence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) due to symptoms and drop of ABI of ≥ 20% or > 0.15 when compared to post-procedure or restenosis with PVR > 2.4 evaluated by duplex ultrasound

  2. Safety outcome

    Time frame: through 12 months post-procedure

    Composite of freedom from device and procedure-related death through 12 months post procedure as well as freedom from both target limb major amputation and clinically-driven target vessel vessel revasculariza-tion

Secondary outcomes

  1. TLR rate

    Time frame: 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months after study procedure

    ocurrence of Target lesion revascularization (TLR) at certain time Points

  2. Rutherford classification

    Time frame: at 12 months after study procedure

    Sustained clinical improvement: an improvement shift in the Rutherford classification of one class in amputation and TVR free surviving patients

  3. Walking capacity assessment 1

    Time frame: at 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months after study procedure

    patient-self-assessment of walking distance

  4. Walking capacity assessment 2

    Time frame: at 6, 12, 24, 48 months after study procedure

    6-minute Walking test (6MWT)

  5. Walking capacity assessment 3

    Time frame: at 6, 12, 24, 48 months after study procedure

    Treadmill test (optional)

  6. Walking capacity assessment 4

    Time frame: at 6, 12, 24, 48 months after study procedure

    Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ); 20 questions (scale 0 to 4); best score 0, worst score 80

  7. Duplex Ultrasound

    Time frame: post-procedure and at 6, 12, 24 and 48 months or at any time of re-intervention

    Duplex-defined binary restenosis (PSVR >2.4) of the target lesion

  8. ABI

    Time frame: at discharge, 6, 12, 24 and 48 months

    Ankle brachial index (ABI)

  9. Qualilty of Life Assessment

    Time frame: at 1 month, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months

    Quality of life assessment (QoL) by EQ5D-3L questionnaire; 5 questions (scale 1 to 5), best score 5, worst score 25

  10. Secondary Safety: freedom from all cause death, target limb major amputation and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization

    Time frame: trough 60 months after study procedure

    Composite of freedom from all cause death through 60 months post procedure as well as freedom from both target limb major amputation and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Jena University Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • Concept Medical Inc.
  • CoreLab Black Forest
  • Vascuscience

Registry information

Official study title

Head-to-Head Comparison of SIROlimus Versus Paclitaxel Drug-Eluting BallooN Angioplasty in the Femoropopliteal Artery

Acronym: SIRONA

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2027
First posted
Jul 17, 2020
Registry last updated
Dec 26, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.