Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00428454

Sirolimus-eluting vs Zotarolimus-eluting Stents for Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions

Primary intracoronary stent placement after successfully crossing chronic total coronary occlusions (CTO) decreases the high restenosis rate at long-term follow-up compared with conventional balloon angioplasty. Several studies have shown the efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents in selected groups of patients. In the PRISON II study we demonstrated that sirolimus-eluting stents were superior to bare metal stents in CTO. In this prospective randomized trial, sirolimus-stent implantation will be compared with zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions. A total of 300 patients will be clinically followed up for 1, 6, 12 months, 2, 3, 4, 5 year with angiographic follow-up at 8 months. Quantitative coronary analysis will be performed by an independent core laboratory. The primary end point is in-segment late luminal loss at 8 month angiographic follow-up.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

AZ Middelheim, Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusions (CTO) was traditionally limited by high restenosis rates. Coronary stenting using bare metal stents significantly decreases restenosis in CTO compared to balloon angioplasty alone, but restenosis rates still reach 32-55%. In 200 patients with CTO, randomized in the PRISON I study we demonstrated a restenosis rate of 22% after bare metal stent (BMS) implantation as compared with 33% after conventional balloon angioplasty. During the past few years, sirolimus (rapamycin), a cytostatic macrocyclic lactone with anti-inflammatory and antiproliferative properties, delivered from a polymer-encapsulated stent was shown to almost eliminate the risk of restenosis in selected groups of patients. The drug zotarolimus (ABT-578), a sirolimus analogue, is designed to inhibit the cellular process that leads to restenosis. In the PRISON II study we have randomized 200 patients with CTO to either BMS implantation or sirolimus-eluting stent implantation and we demonstrated a reduction of in-stent binary restenosis from 36% to 7% and in-segment binary restenosis rates from 41% to 11% in favour of the sirolimus eluting stent. However, no data are available on direct comparison of the clinical efficacy, safety, and angiographic outcome of particular drug-eluting stents in patients with CTO and there may be differences between various drug-eluting stents. The PRISON III study is designed to address this issue and provide information about two different drug-eluting stents. It is a prospective randomized, single blinded trial comparing the relative safety, clinical efficacy and angiographic outcomes of sirolimus and zotarolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing successful recanalization of CTO.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • the estimated duration of the occlusion is at least 2 weeks.
  • signs of ischemia related to the occluded coronary artery.
  • successful recanalization of the occluded artery is achieved.
  • reference diameter is > 2.5 mm.
  • written informed consent obtained.

Exclusion criteria

  • primary or rescue PCI for acute myocardial infarction
  • the lesion could not be crossed.
  • lesions with complex anatomy making successful stent deployment unlikely.
  • the guide wire is not in the true lumen distal to the occlusion.
  • Sirolimus or zotarolimus allergy
  • venous or arterial bypass grafts
  • pregnant or nursing women.
  • participation in an other trial.
  • factors making long-term follow-up difficult or unlikely.
  • life expectancy <1 year.
  • contraindications for ASA or Clopidogrel or heparin.
  • use of coumadins that could not be stopped before the procedure.

Treatment and study plan

sirolimus-eluting stent, zotarolimus-eluting stent

Device

PCI in chronically occluded coronary artery

Primary outcomes

  1. In-segment late luminal loss at 8 months as assessed by an independent angiographic core lab.

    Time frame: 8 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. In-stent late luminal loss

    Time frame: 8 month

  2. In-stent and in-segment binary restenosis rate

    Time frame: 8 month

  3. In-stent and in-segment MLD

    Time frame: 8 month

  4. Percentage diameter stenosis

    Time frame: 8 month

  5. A composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE: death, myocardial infarction and clinically driven target lesion revascularization)

    Time frame: 8 month

  6. Stent thrombosis (acute, <1day; subacute, 1 to 30 days; and late, >30 days)

    Time frame: 30 days

  7. Target vessel failure up to 5 year of clinical follow-up.

    Time frame: 5 years

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

R&D Cardiologie

Other

Collaborators

  • Cordis US Corp.

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Comparison of Sirolimus-eluting Stent Implantation With Zotarolimus-eluting Stent Implantation for the Treatment of Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions. The PRISON III Trial.

Important dates

Study start
2007
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2015
First posted
Jan 30, 2007
Registry last updated
Jun 4, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.