Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT04511234

Sirolimus Coated Balloon Versus Standard Balloon for SFA and Popliteal Artery Disease

This study aims to conduct a randomized, double blind, randomised controlled multicentre trial of sirolimus drug coated balloon versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of superficial and popliteal arterial disease.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

21 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The burden of limb loss as a result of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is high and this problem is set to worsen globally. Treatment of PAD primarily involves revascularisation of the limb. Angioplasty as a first line strategy of revascularization over surgical procedures has been adopted by most vascular centers. Local drug delivery using drug coated balloons (DCB) during angioplasty for PAD can successfully deliver effective local tissue concentrations of anti-proliferative drugs to the lesions in the artery involved in the PAD. This offers the potential for sustained anti-restenotic efficacy.

Randomized trials have shown superiority of Paclitaxel DCBs over just plain-balloon angioplasty for treatment of PAD, and DCB is now considered the standard of care. However a recent meta-analyses which showed increased mortality at two years in patients treated with paclitaxel DCBs have called into question the safety of paclitaxel based DCBs.

Alternative drugs for DCBs are therefore urgently needed and sirolimus offers an attractive alternative. Compared to Paclitaxel, sirolimus is cytostatic in its mode of action with a high margin of safety. It has a high transfer rate to the vessel wall and has been shown to effectively inhibit neointimal hyperplasia in the porcine coronary model. In the coronary artery interventions, preliminary clinical studies using Sirolimus DCBs have also shown excellent procedural and 6 month patency.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 21 years or minimum age
  • Rutherford class 3 to 6 in the target limb

Intraoperative Inclusion Criteria

  • Single or sequential de novo or re-stenotic lesions (stenosis of > 50% or occlusions) from 2 to 20cm in the femoropopliteal arteries. Lesion is considered as one lesion if there is maximum of 30mm gap between lesions at discretion of investigator. Femoropopliteal arteries are superficial femoral artery, popliteal artery P1 and P2
  • Inflow free from flow limiting lesions (<50% stenosis) confirmed by duplex or angiography. Subjects with flow limiting inflow lesions (>50% stenosis) can be included if lesion had been treated successfully (<30% residual stenosis) before or during the index procedure.
  • At least one non-occluded crural vessel (ie. without significant stenosis) with angiographically documented run off to the foot.

Exclusion criteria

  • Comorbid conditions limiting life expectancy ≤ 1 year
  • Subject is currently participating in another investigational drug or device study that has not reached first primary endpoint yet
  • Subject is pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the course of the study
  • Heel gangrene
  • Prior bypass surgery of target vessel
  • Planned amputation of the target limb
  • Previously implanted stent in the target lesion
  • Vulnerable or protected adults
  • Bleeding diathesis or another disorder such as gastrointestinal ulceration which restrict the use of clopidogrel or aspirin
  • Known allergy to sirolimus

Intraoperative Exclusion Criteria

  • Failure to successfully cross the target lesion with a guide wire (successful crossing means tip of the guide wire distal to the target lesion in the absence of flow limiting dissections or perforations)
  • Failure to obtain <30% residual stenosis in a pre-existing lesion
  • Highly calcific lesions
  • Use of DCBs, drug eluting stent, specialty balloons or artherectomy devices during the index procedure. (Non-compliant balloons are not considered specialty balloons)
  • Lesions requiring retrograde access (SAFARI)

Treatment and study plan

MagicTouch PTA sirolimus drug coated balloon (DCB)

Device

For participants randomised to MagicTouch PTA sirolimus DCB, following successful plain balloon angioplasty of the arterial lesion, (defined as <30% residual stenosis after treatment at rated burst pressure of the angioplasty balloon), MagicTouch PTA sirolimus coated balloon will be applied at the lesion after appropriate sizing using the diameter of the plain balloon angioplasty.

POBA standard balloon

Device

For participants randomised to the standard balloon angioplasty group, a placebo standard balloon which is identical to the SCB will also be applied at the lesion after appropriate sizing using the diameter of the plain balloon angioplasty.

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary patency at 6 months

    Time frame: 6 Months

    Primary patency rate at 6 months defined as proportion of subjects with duplex ultrasonography-derived peak systolic velocity ratio of < 2.4 (in absence of target lesion revascularisation)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Device and procedure related death

    Time frame: 1, 6, 12 and 24 Months

    Proportion of device and procedure related death

  2. All-cause death

    Time frame: 1, 6, 12 and 24 Months

    Proportion of subjects died by any cause

  3. Major target limb amputation

    Time frame: 1, 6, 12 and 24 Months

    Proportion of major target limb amputation

  4. Target vessel thrombosis

    Time frame: From day 0 to day 14

    Proportion of subjects with target vessel thrombosis

  5. Proportion of subjects who experienced either death at 6 month or major target limb amputation at 6 month or target vessel thrombosis within 14 days

    Time frame: Day 0 to day 14, 6 Months

    Proportion of subjects who experienced either death at 6 month or major target limb amputation at 6 month or target vessel thrombosis within 14 days

  6. Occurrence of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs and AEs related to device and Occurrence of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs and AEs related to device and procedure

    Time frame: From Day 0 to 24 Months Follow-up

    Occurrence of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs and AEs related to device and Occurrence of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs and AEs related to device and procedure

  7. Procedural Success

    Time frame: From Day 1 to discharge up to maximum of 30 days

    Proportion of subjects with procedural success during hospital stay

  8. Proportion of subjects who are free from clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)

    Time frame: 6,12 and 24 Months

    Proportion of subjects who are free from clinically-driven TLR

  9. Proportion of subjects who are free from clinically-driven Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)

    Time frame: 6,12 and 24 Months

    Proportion of subjects who are free from clinically-driven Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)

  10. Primary patency

    Time frame: 12 and 24 Months

    Primary patency rate at 12 and 24 months

  11. Restenosis

    Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 Months

    Proportion of subjects with restenosis

  12. Subjects who are free from MAE

    Time frame: 6 Months

    Proportion of subjects who are free from MAE

  13. Amputation-free survival

    Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 Months

    Amputation-free survival

  14. Clinical Success

    Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 Months

    Proportion of subjects with clinical Success at 6, 12 and 24 months, Clinical success is defined as Improvement in Rutherford classification compared to the pre-procedure Rutherford classification

  15. Device success

    Time frame: Day 1

    Proportion of subjects with device success at day 1

  16. Technical success

    Time frame: Day 1

    Proportion of subjects with technical success at day 1

  17. Wound assessment (if any)

    Time frame: 1, 6, 12, 24 Months

    Wound assessment (if any)

  18. Toe Pressure or ABPI assessment

    Time frame: 6, 12, 24 Months

    Toe Pressure or ABPI assessment

Other outcomes

  1. Improvement of quality of life

    Time frame: 12 and 24 months

    Mean change from baseline in EuroQol-5Dimensions (EQ-5D) health-related quality of life questionnaire score at 12 and 24 months. The score ranges from 0 to 1, and a higher score means a better outcome

  2. Walking impairment

    Time frame: 12 and 24 months

    Mean change from baseline in walking impairment questionnaire score at 12 and 24 months. The score ranges form 0% t 100%, and a higher score means a better outcome

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Edward Choke

CONTACT

[email protected]

+65 69302164

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Concept Medical Inc.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized Controlled Trial of First Sirolimus Coated Balloon Versus Standard Balloon Angioplasty in The Treatment of Superficial Femoral Artery and Popliteal Artery Disease

Acronym: FUTURE-SFA

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2026
First posted
Aug 13, 2020
Registry last updated
Jul 3, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.