Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06210958

Single- vs. Triple-Injection Techniques for Intertransverse Process Blocks in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Trial on Sensory Blockade

The intertransverse process block (ITPB) is an alternatives technique of regional anesthesia for thoracic surgery. However, the precise technique of ITPB remains developing. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of ITPB injections which are single and triple injection in adult-patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. The investigators hypothesize that cutaneous sensory block and perioperative pain outcomes including pain intensity and opioids consumption in patients who received triple injections of ITPB are better than that of single injection.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

20 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Department of Anesthesiology

Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand

About this study

Objectives: evaluate the efficacy of single and triple injections of ultrasound-guided ITPB in adult patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for pulmonary resection Setting: Single center tertiary teaching hospital Participants: adult-patients who undergoing scheduled video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for pulmonary resection.

Intervention: The patient will divide to 2 groups of intervention: single injection of ITPB (S-group) and triple injection of ITPB (T-group). The ITPB will be perform after routine general anesthesia. The primary outcomes is to compare the distribution of cutaneous block after single and triple injections of ultrasound-guided ITPB in adult patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for pulmonary resection. The distribution of cutaneous block will be evaluate at PACU.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 20-70 years old
  • Undergoing scheduled the first time for each side of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for pulmonary resection
  • American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) physical status I-III
  • Patients have ability to communicate and understand the study and accept to participate in study
  • Body weight >40 kg

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who allergic to bupivacaine, lidocaine, NSAIDS, paracetamol, and dexamethasone
  • Patients who have following underlying disease: renal impairment (diagnosed of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or chronic kidney disease (CKD) which estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 ml/min per 1.73 square meters) , hepatic impairment (diagnosed of cirrhosis or evidence of abnormal liver function test which are increased liver enzymes or bilirubin level), coagulopathy (diagnosed of disease associated with abnormal coagulation, currently use any anticoagulants or evidence of prolong prothrombin time (PT) or partial thromboplastin time (PTT)), thrombocytopenia (platelet count less than 150,000/microliter), platelet disfunction from any causes such as current use antiplatelet or uremia (BUN level > 60 mg/dL) , morbid obesity (BMI >40 kg/m2), pre-existing neurological deficits, chronic pain (diagnosed of chronic pain disease or current use regular analgesic drugs), or any drug addiction • Withdrawal criteria: a participant will be withdrawn from the study in case of
  • Procedural failure: the operator cannot place the needle tip in the intertransverse tissue according to the technical difficulty or abnormal anatomy after 15 minutes of performing the block (from the beginning of needle insertion to the injection of local anesthetic) 2. Anesthetic related events including cardiac arrest, difficult intubation 3. Surgical related events including massive bleeding, major organ injury, converted operation to open thoracotomy and reoperation within admission 4. Participant related reasons including patient's willing to withdraw from the study or failure to adhere adequately to protocol requirements such as premature discharge. However, the withdrawn participant will be continued follow up of clinical outcome.

Treatment and study plan

Intertransverse process block

Other

The patients will be randomized into 2 groups which will receive the different techniques of the intertransverse process block

Primary outcomes

  1. To compare the distribution of cutaneous block after the inter transverse process block and triple injections of ultrasound-guided ITPB in adult patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lobectomy

    Time frame: at 1 hour after the end of surgery

    the distribution of cutaneous block is the cutaneous sensory distribution of dermatomes involvement by the intertransverse process block. A cutaneous sensory distribution is defined as an area of reduced sensitivity to cold touch as compare to the abdomen which participants know as 'normal'. The assessment begins at the mid-clavicular line on the block side, processing laterally to the posterior axillary line on the chest wall and apex of axilla (between T2-T10 dermatomes) at about 1-cm intervals, bilaterally.

Secondary outcomes

  1. To compare pain intensity using numerical rating scale during the first 24-hours postoperative period after single and triple injections of ultrasound-guided ITPB in adult patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lobectomy

    Time frame: 24 hour after surgery

    The numerical rating scale is a pain scales using numbers from 0 to 10. A score of 0 means no pain, and 10 means the worst pain.

  2. To compare opioids consumption during the intraoperative and the first 24-hours postoperative period after single and triple injections of ultrasound-guided ITPB in adult patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lobectomy

    Time frame: 24 hour after surgery

  3. To compare adverse complication (pneumothorax, hemothorax) after single and triple injections of ultrasound-guided ITPB in adult patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lobectomy

    Time frame: 24 hour after intervention

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Chiang Mai University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Comparison of Cutaneous Sensory Blockade Between Ultrasound Guided Single and Triple Injections of Intertransverse Process Block in Patients Undergoing Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Jan 18, 2024
Registry last updated
Feb 19, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.