Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03852095

Single Time Management Diseases in Pediatric Traumatology

A recent internal study evaluating the relevance of the visit to traumatology consultation in our establishment highlight that 49.3% of consultations were not relevant passages. The project consists of individualizing 5 to 6 pathologies and to create care sheets and patient sheets to be given to the care teams and patients when the pathology lends itself to it. The aim is to reduce the irrelevant passage rate during these consultations, which is the source of absence from iterative work for parents, collateral expenses (toll, parking), absence from school for the children, unjustified expenses and X-ray examination unnecessary most often.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

1 year–18 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Fondation Lenval Hopitaux Pediatriques de Nice Chu Lenval

Nice, France

About this study

The Pediatric Orthopedics and Traumatology department proposes a reform of the care in Traumatology of the children in order to improve and homogenize the care for a better relevance of these.

A recent internal study (June 2018) evaluating the relevance of the visit to traumatology consultation in our establishment to highlight that 49.3% of consultations were not relevant passages (Benign diseases of sprained ankle type, muscular contusion or simple bone removals). Indeed, these specialist consultations are currently filled by pathologies of simple treatment that do not require medical follow-up (neither clinical nor radiological follow-up).

The project consists of individualizing 5 to 6 pathologies found in consultation recurrently which the scientific literature has established that their follow-up is not justified, and to create care sheets and patient sheets to be given to the care teams and patients when the pathology lends itself to it. These cards will include all the management of the pathology of the definition itself, including the treatment and expected outcomes.

The aim is to reduce the irrelevant passage rate during these consultations, which is the source of absence from iterative work for parents, collateral expenses (toll, parking), absence from school for the children, unjustified expenses and X-ray examination unnecessary most often.

The expected benefit is parental and child satisfaction, a time saving for the practitioner that he can reinvest in consultations for patients who are in fact a specialist opinion and a relative budget saving for the establishment.

The method of study of the decline of irrelevant consultations will be made by a systematic review of each reason for consultation over a period of 3 months after implementation of the cards and study of the percentage of irrelevant consultation over the same period. The objective pursued is a drop in attendance of at least 25% of consultations deemed irrelevant in Traumatology, associated with a satisfaction rate of parents greater than 90%.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 0-18 years
  • Positive diagnosis of elbow haemarthrosis, radial salter 1 fracture, fibula fracture 1 fracture, radial butter ball fracture, simple ankle sprain, simple knee sprain, fracture of the middle third of the clavicle .........
  • No other associated anomaly

Exclusion criteria

  • Refusal of the family ..............................................
  • No understanding of the instructions ...............................
  • Unaffiliated patient social security ..................................
  • No French speaking .............

Treatment and study plan

minor trauma

Other

following the management of the patient's fracture in the emergency department, the patients / parents are recalled 2 months (J60) after the visit to the emergency room, and are interviewed by following the pre-established interrogation form, which checks the good agreement of the patient. treatment performed with the given sheet and recommendations, and assesses the satisfaction.

Other names: medical recommendation sheet

Primary outcomes

  1. Change of the number of patients routinely summoned to post-emergency trauma consultation

    Time frame: at 6 months

    decrease in the number of patients coming back for an unjustified consultation for these 4 pathologies by comparing the period from 6 months preceding the start of the protocol to a period of 6 months after starting the protocol.

Secondary outcomes

  1. measurement of patient satisfaction

    Time frame: at 60 days after inclusion

    Call by phone the patient to measure the satisfaction by a standard questionnaire. the scale is composed of 7 closed questions on the satisfaction of care in emergencies, the follow-up of the patient by a city doctor. the answers are yes or no.

  2. compliance of care

    Time frame: at 60 days after inclusion

    call by phone the patient to verify the good compliance of the care. The improvement of the care will be evaluated according to the number of patient treated for one of these pathologies having felt the need to consult another doctor / orthopedic surgeon that is envisaged by the protocol (in the days following emergency room consultation).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Fondation Lenval

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Single Time Management for Seven Common Disease in Pediatric Traumatology. A Monocentric Prospective Study

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Feb 22, 2019
Registry last updated
Jul 19, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.