Universitat Rovira i Virgili
Reus, Tarragona, 43201, Spain
NCT Number: NCT05882149
Probiotics have been recognized as functional foods with beneficial effects against obesity and cardiometabolic diseases, such as dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes and the reduction of visceral fat mass, body weight and waist circumference.
In previous studies, it was shown that capsule/powder probiotic or postbiotic supplementation containing a single strain probiotic, could reduce anthropometric parameters, including the visceral fat area, and contribute to type 2 diabetes management in subjects with abdominal obesity. Similar findings were found when this single strain probiotic was delivered through enriched seafood sticks. Results showed that enriched seafood sticks significantly reduced insulin concentrations and HOMA-IR, pulse pressure, waist circumference, body weight and triglycerides.
These findings suggest that this specific single strain probiotic as a probiotic or postbiotic, could be a complementary strategy in the management of cardiometabolic disease risk factors.
Probiotics have mostly been studied incorporated in dairy food matrix. Other food matrices, such as chewing gum, have scarcely been exploited by the food industry. Chewing gum as a novel vehicle for probiotics presents the ability to release active ingredients into the oral cavity with a steady and rapid action. Furthermore, it has a high acceptance amongst adults and children and present few side effects.
No previous randomized controlled trials have examined the effect of a probiotic chewing gum on anthropometric adiposity biomarkers and glucose homeostasis in abdominally obese individuals.
The main objective of the present study is to evaluate the efficacy of single strain probiotic in the reduction of waist circumference in abdominally obese individuals.
The specific objectives:
* To evaluate the efficacy of single strain probiotic in the improvement of other anthropometric biomarkers (waist-hip-ratio, body weight, BMI, total fat mass, visceral fat index, free fat mass, lean body mass, conicity index, visceral adipose tissue and subcutaneous fat). * To evaluate the efficacy of single strain probiotic in the management of glucose homeostasis. * To evaluate the efficacy of single strain probiotic in the management of serum lipid levels. * To evaluate the efficacy of single strain probiotic in the reduction of blood pressure and pulse pressure. * To asses Quality of life after single strain probiotic supplementation. * To identify changes in caloric intake and subjective satiety after single strain probiotic supplementation. * To identify changes in gastrointestinal health after single strain probiotic supplementation. * To identify changes in the oral microbiome after single strain probiotic supplementation. * To identify changes in the gastrointestinal microbiome after single strain probiotic supplementation.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Reus, Tarragona, 43201, Spain
A total of 120 adult volunteers will be included in the intervention (60 in each arm of the intervention).
During the CHOICE study, there will be 6 visits in total. Of these visits, 3 will be face-to-face and 3 by telephone. The study visits will be the following: screening visit (V0, face-to-face): to check inclusion/exclusion criteria and, in case of satisfying the inclusion criteria; basal visit (V1, face-to- face); visits during the intervention (V2, V3 and V4 via telephone); final study visit (V5, face-to-face).
In visits V0, V1 and V5 volunteers must present themselves in fasting conditions of 8 hours to obtain blood samples. In visits V1 and V5 volunteers must bring saliva and faeces samples.
In order to measure the changes in visceral adipose tissue, up to five days prior to the visit V1 and approximately up to 3 days prior after the V5, volunteers must have a Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) for measuring visceral fat.
CHOICE Study
Visit 0 (V0, week -1): Recruitment and selection
Visit 1 (V1, week 0): Basal visit
Visit 2 (V2, week 3): Follow-up during the intervention
Visit 3 (V3, week 6): Follow-up during the intervention
Visit 4 (V4, week 9): Follow-up during the intervention
Visit 5 (V2, week 12): Final visit
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Sugar-free chewing gum with single strain probiotic and zinc.
The dosage will be 2 chewing a day, served at the same time and chewed for 6 minutes outside meals (for example 2h after breakfast or lunch).
Sugar-free chewing gum.
The dosage will be 2 chewing a day, served at the same time and chewed for 6 minutes outside meals (for example 2h after breakfast or lunch).
Time frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Difference in waist circumference (cm) measured by an MRI transverse body scan in one axial slice 5 cm over L5 from week 0 to week 12
Time frame: Week 0 to week 12
Differences in intra-abdominal area (cm2) measured by MRI (transverse body scan in one axial slice 5cm over L5) from week 0 to week 12
Time frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in hip circumference (cm) measured at the widest portion of the buttocks using a 150-cm anthropometric steel measuring tape from week 0 to week 12
Time frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in waist-hip-ratio (cm) measured as waist circumference/hip circumference from week 0 to week 12
Time frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in body weight (kg) measured using a Tanita MC 780-MA; Tanita Corp., Barcelona, Spain, from week 0 to week 12
Time frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in body mass index (kg/m2) calculated as weight (kg) divided to height (m2), from week 0 to week 12
Time frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in total fat mass (% kg) measured using a Tanita MC 780-MA; Tanita Corp., Barcelona, Spain, from week 0 to week 12
Time frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in free fat mass (%, kg) measured using a Tanita MC 780-MA; Tanita Corp., Barcelona, Spain, from week 0 to week 12
Time frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in Lean body mass (%, kg) measured using a Tanita MC 780-MA; Tanita Corp., Barcelona, Spain, from week 0 to week 12
Time frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in visceral fat index obtained using a Tanita MC 780-MA; Tanita Corp., Barcelona, Spain, from week 0 to week 12
Time frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in Conicity index calculated as waist circumference (cm)/0.109 x square root of weight (kg)/height (m) from week 0 to week 12
Time frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in Visceral adipose tissue (cm2) measured by MRI (transverse body scan in one axial slice 5cm over L5-S1) from week 0 to week 12
Time frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in Subcutaneous fat (cm2) measured by MRI, transverse body scan in one axial slice 5cm over L5-S1 from week 0 to week 12
Time frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in Fasting blood glucose (mmol/L) measured by Standardized methods in an automated analyzer from week 0 to week 12
Time frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in Fasting insulin (IU/mL) measured by Standardized methods in an automated analyzer from week 0 to week 12
Time frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in HOMA index measured with the formula insulin x glucose/405 from week 0 to week 12
Time frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in glycosylated hemoglobin (%) measured by Standardized methods in an automated analyzer from week 0 to week 12
Time frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in Total cholesterol (mmol/L) measured by Standardized methods in an automated analyzer from week 0 to week 12
Time frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in HDLc (mmol/L) measured by Standardized methods in an automated analyzer from week 0 to week 12
Time frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in LDLc (mmol/L) measured by Standardized methods in an automated analyzer from week 0 to week 12
Time frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences inTotal Triglycerides (mmol/L) measured by Standardized methods in an automated analyzer from week 0 to week 12
Time frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) measured by an automatic phygmomanometer (OMRON HEM-907; Peroxfarma, Barcelona, Spain) measured twice after adult respite 2-5 min seated, with a 1-min interval in between from week 0 to week 12
Time frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) measured by an automatic hygmomanometer (OMRON HEM-907; Peroxfarma, Barcelona, Spain) measured twice after adult respite 2-5 min seated, with a 1-min interval in between from week 0 to week 12
Time frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in Pulse pressure (mmHg), calculated as the difference between the upper and lower numbers of blood pressure, from week 0 to week 12
Time frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in TFEQ score from week 0 to week 12. The minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 100, and higher score means a worse outcome.
Time frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in BES score from week 0 to week 12. The minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 46, and higher score means a worse outcome.maximum score is 100, and higher score means a worse outcome.
Time frame: From week 0 to week 12
Differences in dietary intake assessed by a 3-day dietary record from week 0 to week 12
Time frame: From week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12
Differences in satiety, assessed by a Visual Annual Scale (VAS), from week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12. The minimum score is -100 mm and maximum score is 100 mm, and higher score means a better outcome.
Time frame: From week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12
Differences in bowel habit, assessed by bristol scale, from week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12. In this scale there are 7 descriptive points, the minimum score is "severe constipation" and maximum score is "severe diarrhea". The better outcome is in the middle of the 7 descriptive points (points 3 and 4): "normal".
Time frame: From week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12
Differences in the presence of flatulence (yes or not), from week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12
Time frame: From week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12
Differences in the presence of nausea (yes or not), from week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12
Time frame: From week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12
Differences in the presence of reflux (yes or not), from week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12
Time frame: From week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12
Differences in the presence of abdominal distension (yes or not), from week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12
Time frame: From week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12
Differences in the presence of diarrhea (yes or not), from week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12
Time frame: From week 0 to week 12
Differences in Phyla composition, assessed by metagenomics, from week 0 to week 12
Time frame: From week 0 to week 12
Differences in Phyla composition, assessed by metagenomics, from week 0 to week 12
Time frame: From week 0 to week 12
Differences in Visceral adipose tissue (mm) measured by ultrasound (xipho-umbilical axis, 1-5 cm above navel) from week 0 to week 12
Time frame: Week 0 to week 12
Changes in waist circumference (cm) measured at the 2cm above the umbilicus using a 150-cm anthropometric steel measuring tape from week 0 to week 12.
Time frame: Week 0 to week 12
Changes in Subcutaneous adipose tissue (mm) measured by ultrasound (xipho-umbilical axis, 1-5 cm above navel) from week 0 to week 12
Rosa Sola
Other
Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Single Strain Probiotic, Delivered in a Chewing Gum, on the Reduction of Anthropometric Adiposity Biomarkers and the Improvement of Glucose Homeostasis in Abdominally Obese Individuals.
Acronym: CHOICE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06208163
Abdominal Obesity, Body Weight
Marietta, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04190706
Abdominal Obesity, Bacteremia
Pierre-Bénite, France
View Trial DetailsNCT03773900
Abdominal Obesity, Body Weight
Pierre-Bénite, France
View Trial DetailsNCT02561611
Abdominal Obesity, Behavior
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States
View Trial Details