LAS100977
DrugDry powder inhalation,Once daily, single dose
NCT Number: NCT01425814
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the pharmacodynamics (bronchodilation) of single doses of inhaled LAS100977 in COPD patients.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Almirall Investigational Sites#2, Berlin, Germany
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Dry powder inhalation,Once daily, single dose
Dry powder inhalation (capsule),single dose
Dry powder inhalation or Dry powder inhalation (capsule),Once daily, single dose
Time frame: Day 2
Baseline was the average of the two values measured just prior to the administration of the dose of investigational medicinal product at Day 1 of each visit (time points -45 min and -15 min) Trough at Day 2 was computed as the average of the two values measured at 23 and 24 hours after administration of the morning dose of investigational medicinal product on Day 1 At each time point, three technically adequate lung function measurements were performed by spirometry according to the acceptability and repeatability criteria of the ATS/ERS; the highest values for the FEV1 and FVC were selected
Time frame: Day 1
Baseline was the average of the two values measured just prior to the administration of the dose of investigational medicinal product at Day 1 of each visit (time points -45 min and -15 min) At each time point, three technically adequate lung function measurements were performed by spirometry according to the acceptability and repeatability criteria of the ATS/ERS; the highest values for the FEV1 and FVC were selected
Time frame: Up to Day 2
Baseline was the average of the two values measured just prior to the administration of the dose of investigational medicinal product at Day 1 of each visit (time points -45 min and -15 min) At each time point, three technically adequate lung function measurements were performed by spirometry according to the acceptability and repeatability criteria of the ATS/ERS; the highest values for the FEV1 and FVC were selected
Time frame: Up to Day 2
At each time point, three technically adequate lung function measurements were performed by spirometry according to the acceptability and repeatability criteria of the ATS/ERS; the highest values for the FEV1 and FVC were selected
Time frame: Day 1
Baseline was the average of the two values measured just prior to the administration of the dose of investigational medicinal product at Day 1 of each visit (time points -45 min and -15 min) At each time point, three technically adequate lung function measurements were performed by spirometry according to the acceptability and repeatability criteria of the ATS/ERS; the highest values for the FEV1 and FVC were selected
Time frame: Day 1
At each time point, three technically adequate lung function measurements were performed by spirometry according to the acceptability and repeatability criteria of the ATS/ERS; the highest values for the FEV1 and FVC were selected
Time frame: Day 2
Baseline was the average of the two values measured just prior to the administration of the dose of investigational medicinal product at Day 1 of each visit (time points -45 min and -15 min) Trough at Day 2 was computed as the average of the two values measured at 23 and 24 hours after administration of the morning dose of investigational medicinal product on Day 1 At each time point, three technically adequate lung function measurements were performed by spirometry according to the acceptability and repeatability criteria of the ATS/ERS; the highest values for the FEV1 and FVC were selected
Time frame: Day 1
Baseline was the average of the two values measured just prior to the administration of the dose of investigational medicinal product at Day 1 of each visit (time points -45 min and -15 min) At each time point, three technically adequate lung function measurements were performed by spirometry according to the acceptability and repeatability criteria of the ATS/ERS; the highest values for the FEV1 and FVC were selected
Time frame: Up to Day 2
Baseline was the average of the two values measured just prior to the administration of the dose of investigational medicinal product at Day 1 of each visit (time points -45 min and -15 min) At each time point, three technically adequate lung function measurements were performed by spirometry according to the acceptability and repeatability criteria of the ATS/ERS; the highest values for the FEV1 and FVC were selected
Time frame: Up to Day 2
At each time point, three technically adequate lung function measurements were performed by spirometry according to the acceptability and repeatability criteria of the ATS/ERS; the highest values for the FEV1 and FVC were selected
Time frame: Day 1
Baseline was the average of the two values measured just prior to the administration of the dose of investigational medicinal product at Day 1 of each visit (time points -45 min and -15 min) At each time point, three technically adequate lung function measurements were performed by spirometry according to the acceptability and repeatability criteria of the ATS/ERS; the highest values for the FEV1 and FVC were selected
Time frame: Day 1
At each time point, three technically adequate lung function measurements were performed by spirometry according to the acceptability and repeatability criteria of the ATS/ERS; the highest values for the FEV1 and FVC were selected
Time frame: Up to Day 2
Baseline was the average of the two values measured just prior to the administration of the dose of investigational medicinal product at Day 1 of each visit (time points -45 min and -15 min) At each time point, three technically adequate lung function measurements were performed by spirometry according to the acceptability and repeatability criteria of the ATS/ERS
Time frame: Up to Day 2
At each time point, three technically adequate lung function measurements were performed by spirometry according to the acceptability and repeatability criteria of the ATS/ERS
AstraZeneca
Industry
A Phase IIa, Randomised, Single Dose, Double-blind, Double-dummy, 6 Way Complete Cross-over, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of 4 Strengths of LAS100977 QD Compared to Placebo and an Active Comparator in Patients With Stable Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06040086
Chronic Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01917331
Chronic Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Szeged, Hungary
View Trial DetailsNCT06897748
Chronic Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Aramil, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT04119934
Behavior, Chronic Disease
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial Details