Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07725120

Single-Center Study Evaluating the Impact of Age on the Diagnostic Performance of the Sural-to-Radial Sensory Amplitude Ratio in Length-Dependent and Non-Length-Dependent Peripheral Polyneuropathies

This retrospective single-center observational study will evaluate the impact of age on the diagnostic performance of the sural-to-radial sensory nerve amplitude ratio (SRAR) in patients with length-dependent and non-length-dependent peripheral sensory polyneuropathies. Clinical and electrophysiological data collected during routine care between January 2013 and July 2026 will be analyzed. Diagnostic performance will be assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis across predefined age groups to determine whether age-adjusted SRAR thresholds improve the differentiation between the two polyneuropathy phenotypes.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year–90 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

About this study

Peripheral sensory polyneuropathies are commonly classified as length-dependent (LDN) or non-length-dependent (NLDN) based on their clinical and electrophysiological features. This distinction is clinically important because it guides etiological investigations and therapeutic management. The sural-to-radial sensory nerve amplitude ratio (SRAR) is an electrophysiological marker that has been proposed to improve the diagnosis of sensory polyneuropathies and to help differentiate LDN from NLDN. Although the SRAR has traditionally been considered independent of demographic characteristics, recent evidence suggests that it decreases with aging, raising concerns about the use of a single diagnostic threshold across all age groups. The impact of age on the diagnostic performance of the SRAR, particularly in patients with non-length-dependent polyneuropathies, remains poorly characterized. This retrospective single-center study will analyze clinical and electrophysiological data from patients evaluated at the Peripheral Neuromuscular Rare Disease Reference Center of Nice University Hospital between January 2013 and July 2026. The study aims to determine whether age-adjusted SRAR thresholds improve the diagnostic discrimination between length-dependent and non-length-dependent peripheral polyneuropathies.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Diagnosis of peripheral sensory polyneuropathy.
  • Classification as length-dependent (LDN) or non-length-dependent (NLDN) based on clinical and electrophysiological findings.
  • Available nerve conduction study including sural and radial sensory nerve amplitudes allowing calculation of the SRAR.
  • Evaluated at the Peripheral Neuromuscular Rare Disease Reference Center, Nice University Hospital, between January 2013 and July 2026.

Exclusion criteria

  • Missing or incomplete clinical or electrophysiological data preventing SRAR calculation.
  • Unclassifiable neuropathy phenotype.
  • Technical factors affecting the reliability of nerve conduction studies.

Treatment and study plan

Retrospective Medical Record Review

Other

This observational study involves retrospective collection and analysis of routinely acquired clinical and electrophysiological data from approximately 180 patients with sensory polyneuropathy. Data extracted from medical records include demographic characteristics, clinical diagnosis, and nerve conduction study parameters, including sural and radial sensory nerve action potential amplitudes used to calculate the sural/radial amplitude ratio (SRAR). No additional diagnostic procedures, treatments, or study-specific assessments are performed. All data are obtained from standard clinical care.

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic performance of the sural-to-radial sensory nerve amplitude ratio (SRAR)

    Time frame: Baseline (retrospective analysis of data collected between January 2013 and July 2026

    To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the SRAR for differentiating length-dependent (LDN) from non-length-dependent (NLDN) peripheral sensory polyneuropathies according to age group, using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Age-specific optimal SRAR diagnostic thresholds

    Time frame: Baseline (retrospective analysis)

    To determine the optimal SRAR cutoff values for each predefined age group using the Youden index derived from ROC curve analysis.

  2. Comparison of SRAR values between LDN and NLDN

    Time frame: Baseline (retrospective analysis)

    To compare SRAR values between patients with length-dependent and non-length-dependent peripheral sensory polyneuropathies and to assess the influence of age on these values.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Abderhmane Slioui

CONTACT

[email protected]

0492038953 ext. +33

Angela Puma

CONTACT

[email protected]

0492035435 ext. +33

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Retrospective Single-Center Study Evaluating the Impact of Age on the Diagnostic Performance of the Sural-to-Radial Sensory Amplitude Ratio in Length-Dependent and Non-Length-Dependent Peripheral Polyneuropathies

Acronym: ASPIRE

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jul 24, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 24, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.