Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02434471

Single Breath Hold Abdominal MRI

The purpose of this study is to evaluate a single breath hold abdominal MRI protocol and compare the image quality of respiratory triggered 3D T1-weighted images against conventional breath hold images.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

DukeUMC

Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • undergoing abdominal MRI

Exclusion criteria

  • none

Treatment and study plan

Respiratory-triggered T1w DISCO LAVA

Device

The study will acquire extra image sets using DISCO LAVA with one breath hold during the arterial imaging phase. No additional breath holds will be required.

  • Respiratory-triggered T1w DISCO LAVA precontrast
  • Respiratory-triggered T1w DISCO LAVA in the portal venous phase
  • Respiratory-triggered T1w DISCO LAVA in the equilibrium phase

Primary outcomes

  1. Motion Artifact Scores

    Time frame: During MRI, up to 60 minutes

    Three investigators will independently evaluate MRI examinations. They will assign motion scores between respiratory triggered and corresponding breath hold acquisitions. 1 = no motion artifact; 2 = minimal motion artifact, no effect on diagnostic quality; 3 = moderate motion artifact with some, but not severe, effect on diagnostic quality; 4 = severe motion artifact, images degraded but interpretable; and 5 = extensive motion artifact, images nondiagnostic.

  2. Noise Scores

    Time frame: During MRI, up to 60 minutes

    Three investigators will independently evaluate MRI examinations. They will assign noise scores between respiratory triggered and corresponding breath hold acquisitions. 1 = no noise artifact; 2 = minimal noise artifact, no effect on diagnostic quality; 3 = moderate noise artifact with some, but not severe, effect on diagnostic quality; 4 = severe noise artifact, images degraded but interpretable; and 5 = severe noise artifact, images nondiagnostic.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Duke University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
May 5, 2015
Registry last updated
Jul 2, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.