National Centre for Infectious Diseases
Singapore, 308442
NCT Number: NCT06654973
The goal of this study is to conduct a safe SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant human infection challenge in adult healthy volunteers. The main objectives are to:
* Induce laboratory confirmed infection in up to 70% of participants * Confirm the safety profile as measured by the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) from the day of viral challenge (Day 0) up to Day 28 follow-up.
Participants will be given the GMP-produced Delta SARS-CoV-2 virus via intranasal drops using the optimized conditions established in the "Development of a SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant human infection challenge model" (COVHIC002) Human Challenge Study being conducted in the UK. A safe and well-tolerated human challenge model with the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant will be established in Singapore. This model will be used to accelerate next-generation vaccine development and to determine the factors associated with altered clinical and virological outcomes; correlates of protection; and targets for the development of novel vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me21 year–30 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Singapore, 308442
Human challenge studies involve the deliberate infection of volunteers to allow detailed investigation of host-pathogen interactions and the effect of interventions. The strength of these studies lies in their highly controlled nature. Carefully selected participant groups are inoculated with standardised amounts of a well-characterised virus. This enables exact longitudinal measurement of viral kinetics, immunological responses, transmission dynamics and the duration of infectious shedding. By giving all study participants the same virus at the same dose and under the same conditions, confounding by virus strain, dose, and exposure is controlled. Host factors associated with inter-individual differences in clinical outcome as well as the effect of interventions can then be robustly inferred.
The Human Challenge study contrasts with even the most well-controlled field trials, including household contact studies. In natural infection, the virus quasi-species (i.e., mixture of slightly differing virus particles), dose, timing and conditions of exposure cannot be known, and contacts are only identified following diagnosis of the index case. At this time, secondary exposure has almost always already occurred, thus missing transmission events as well as the early phase of infection. Human challenge is therefore the only study design where the earliest pre-symptomatic changes post infection may be studied. These early time-points are critical to understanding how some people who are exposed to a virus resist infection and to delineate early infectiousness and transmissibility.
The first SARS-CoV-2 human challenge study (COVHIC001) was conducted in 2021 and showed no serious safety concerns after inoculating 36 healthy, unvaccinated, young adults with a pre-Alpha "Wuhan" strain of SARS-CoV-2. A follow up human challenge study with a Delta variant (COVHIC002) is currently ongoing in the UK. COVHIC002 will determine and optimise the conditions for a safe human challenge model with the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant. These conditions will subsequently be applied in this companion study, Sing-CoV.
Importantly, a model of vaccine breakthrough infection will have a substantially improved safety profile compared with the first (seronegative) study as:
Recent SARS-CoV-2 variants-of-concern (VOC; Delta and Omicron) have shown high rates of vaccine breakthrough infection, indicating that human challenge with these strains may be optimised as a platform for the rapid testing of vaccines and therapeutics in small numbers of participants despite pre-existing immunity, especially between waves of the pandemic, when occurrence of natural disease is relatively uncommon. This will enable efficient early-stage testing of the many vaccine and antiviral candidates in development so that the most promising can go forward quickly enough to large-scale field efficacy trials to meaningfully tackle the ongoing pandemic.
Thus, in the short term, a Delta human challenge model will uniquely enable:
Establishing the capability to perform SARS-CoV-2 human challenge studies in Singapore will be highly significant. Firstly, this will facilitate development of therapeutics and vaccines in the region; secondly, it will ensure inferences drawn from SARS-CoV-2 human challenge studies are applicable to people of Asian ethnicity; and thirdly, it will support capacity development in the region where future coronavirus pandemics (like SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2) are expected to originate.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
5b) Male participants who are willing to use one of the contraception methods described in the study protocol, from the time of the date of viral challenge, for 6 months.
Exclusion criteria
Consider exclusion in the following cases: (a) Participants with history of anxiety-related symptoms of any severity within the last 2 years if the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 score is ≥4; (b)Participants with a history of depression of any severity within the last 2 years if the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score is ≥4. (c) severe claustrophobia
Ex-smokers: Participants who have smoked >5 pack years at any time [5 pack years is equivalent to one pack of 20 cigarettes a day for 5 years]. Ex-smokers that have smoked <5 pack years at any time must not have smoked in the last 3 months.
Any of the following:
The challenge virus used in Sing-CoV study is the same as that used in COVHIC002 study. It was originally obtained in mid 2021 from a nose-throat swab from an otherwise healthy young adult with mild COVID-19 in the community. The procedure for isolation, storage, preparation, and administration of challenge virus in this study (Sing-CoV and COVHIC002) is the same as used in the first SARS-CoV-2 human challenge study (COVHIC001) at Imperial College London and the same as used in the COV-CHIM01 (NCT04864548) SARS-CoV-2 human challenge study at University of Oxford.
Time frame: From day of viral challenge (Day 0) to Day 28 follow-up visit
To evaluate the safety of a SARS-CoV-2 challenge in healthy participants by assessing:
Time frame: From day 2 post-inoculation to day of discharge from quarantine (Day 10 for uninfected participants or Day 14 for infected participants)
To determine the attack rate of the Delta variant SARS-CoV-2 inoculum dose of TID 1x106 in sero-selected participants. Laboratory confirmed infection is defined as:
Time frame: From day of viral challenge (Day 0) to day of discharge from quarantine (Day 10 for uninfected participants or Day 14 for infected participants)
To assess the incidence of laboratory confirmed infection rates using a) mid turbinate samples, b) throat swabs, and c) both mid turbinate and throat swabs.
Time frame: From day of viral challenge (Day 0) to day of discharge from quarantine (Day 10 for uninfected participants or Day 14 for infected participants)
To assess the incidence of lab-confirmed symptomatic SARSCoV-2 infection using a) mid turbinate samples, b) throat swabs, and c) both mid turbinate and throat swabs.
Time frame: Day of inoculation (Day 0) to day of discharge from quarantine (Day 10 for uninfected participants or Day 14 for infected participants)
To assess viral dynamics using a) mid turbinate samples, and b) throat swabs, as measured by qPCR.
Time frame: Day of inoculation (Day 0) to day of discharge from quarantine (Day 10 for uninfected participants or Day 14 for infected participants)
Sum total symptoms diary card score: sum total clinical symptoms (TSS) as measured by graded symptom scoring system, starting one day post-viral challenge (Day 1) up to discharge from quarantine.
Time frame: Day of inoculation (Day 0) to discharge from quarantine (Day 10 for uninfected participants or Day 14 for infected participants)
The incidence of:
Time frame: Day of inoculation (Day 0) to Day 28 follow up
The University of Pennslvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) will be used. It is provided as booklets containing a series of cards that the participants scratch and smell then asked to identify the odours. The test provides an index of absolute dysfunction (ie, anosmia, severe microsmia, moderate microsmia, mild microsmia, normosmia, factitious), as well as relative dysfunction based upon age and gender-adjusted normative percentile ranks. The total number of odorant stimuli out of 40 that is correctly identified serves as the test measure. Scores on this test correlate well with other types of olfactory tests, including threshold tests. The UPSIT is designed to be self-administered after explanation of the test by study staff and will be performed once before virus inoculation and then approximately every third day starting from Day 1, though the test can be conducted more frequently at the discretion of the Investigator.
Time frame: Day of inoculation (Day 0) to Day 28 follow up
To explore safety related measures of SARS-CoV-2 challenge in healthy participants by assessing the occurrence of haematological and biochemical laboratory abnormalities during the quarantine period.
Time frame: From Day 2 post-inoculation to discharge from quarantine (Day 10 for uninfected participants or Day 14 for infected participants)
To measure the laboratory confirmed infection rates, as defined by:
Time frame: From Day 1 post-inoculation up to discharge from quarantine (Day 10 for uninfected participants or Day 14 for infected participants)
To assess viral dynamics in saliva by qPCR.
Time frame: From Day 1 post-inoculation up to discharge from quarantine (Day 10 for uninfected participants or Day 14 for infected participants)
To measure SARS-CoV-2 excretion in the stool by:
Time frame: Up to Day 360 post-inoculation
Assays performed on blood, stool and mucosal samples to assess humoral immunity / systems serology SARS-CoV-2 (for example: SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing titres, ELISAs to IgG, IgM, IgA, sIgA, ADCC)
Time frame: Up to Day 360 post-inoculation
Assays performed on blood, stool and mucosal samples to assess proteomic levels and changes (for example, cytokine and chemokines).
Time frame: Up to Day 360 post-inoculation
Assays performed on blood, stool and mucosal samples include cellular cell quantification and quality of immunity (for example T and B cell frequencies, phenotypes, and functionality assays, ELISPOTs, ICS).
Time frame: Up to Day 360 post-inoculation
Assays performed on blood, stool and mucosal samples to measure transcriptome levels and changes (for example, RNAseq, single cell RNAseq, microarray, PCR)
Time frame: Day of admission (Day -1) to day of discharge from quarantine (Day 10 for uninfected participants or Day 14 for infected participants)
Air samples, exhaled breath samples with the use of a face mask or G-II exhaled breath collector, and surface swab samples will be used for virus detection and quantification.
Time frame: Up to Day 360 post-inoculation
To measure changes in endothelial function during SARS-CoV-2 infection:
Time frame: Day of admission (Day -1) to day of discharge from quarantine (Day 10 for uninfected participants or Day 14 for infected participants)
To explore the performance of antigen rapid tests performed by participants themselves following manufacturer's instructions (no additional training) in comparison with SARS-CoV-2 PCR and culture
Tan Tock Seng Hospital
Other
The Singapore Platform for Controlled Human Infections With SARS-CoV-2
Acronym: Sing-CoV
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04354558
COVID 19, COVID-19
Amiens, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07287137
COVID - 19, COVID -19
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04522076
COVID 19, COVID-19
Moscow, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT06702540
COVID 19, COVID-19
Milan, Italy
View Trial Details