Alyn Pediatrics Rehabilitation Hospital
Jerusalem, Israel
NCT Number: NCT04531488
This study compared conventional powered mobility practice to simulator based practice of children with special needs aged 6-18 years.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me6 year–18 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Jerusalem, Israel
This study compared conventional powered mobility practice to simulator based practice of children with special needs aged 6-18 years.
The study has 3 stages: 1) Simulator validity study 2) Powered mobility outcome measures reliability and validity for children 6-18 years 3) Intervention study to compare simulator based practice and powered mobility practice.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Two groups of participants- 18 in each- were provided with either a simulator or powered wheelchair. Both groups were tested at baseline for powered mobility level. Both groups the practiced at home or school for 12 weeks, 4 times a week for at least 20 minutes. Both groups returned and underwent another evaluation to assess powered mobility level after 12 weeks of practice.
Other names: Powered Mobility Training with Wheel Chair
Training with Powered Wheel Chair
Time frame: This outcome measure is done at baseline and after 12 weeks of practice.
This is an evaluation that has up to 34 items that assess the driving skills of powered wheelchair users. Each skill can receive a score of 0-5. The higher the score the better. The total sum of all skills is divided by the number of skills tested and an average score ranging from 0-5 is recorded.
Time frame: This outcome measure is done at baseline and after 12 weeks of practice.
This is an evaluation that has 8 levels of 5 skills. It assess the level of powered mobility driving in areas that the PMP does not- cognitive, emotional, social. Each of the 5 skills receives a score of 1-8. The sum of all skills scores is divided by 5. The score can be between 1-8. A higher score is better.
Time frame: This outcome measure is done at baseline and after 12 weeks of practice.
This is an evaluation that assess 7 powered mobility skills. The driver needs to succeed 4/5 times each skill in order to pass test. Each of the 7 skills receives a score of 1,3,5. The sum of all skills is divided by 7 and the average score is recorded 1-5. The higher the score the better.
Alyn Pediatric & Adolescent Rehabilitation Hospital
Other
Powered Mobility Training of Children With Special Needs: Conventional Versus Simulator-based Practice
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07729800
Brain Damage, Chronic, Brain Diseases
Lahore, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT07683338
Bilateral Spastic Cerebral Palsy, Brain Damage, Chronic
Faisalabad, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT07706517
Brain Damage, Chronic, Brain Diseases
Saint-Etienne, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05791877
Brain Damage, Chronic, Brain Diseases
Wilmington, Delaware, United States
View Trial Details