Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07349355

Simulation Practices and Medical Error Tendencies in Nursing Students

As the professional group that has the most frequent contact with patients, nurses are critical to the sustainability of safe care. Literature demonstrates that nursing practice is prone to error due to heavy workloads, time pressures, complex clinical tasks, inadequate rest, inappropriate working conditions, and the physiological strain of demanding shifts. When these conditions strain both physical and cognitive resources, the risk of errors during treatment administration increases.

Medical errors remain one of the most devastating realities of healthcare. Data from the World Health Organization reveals the significant morbidity and mortality caused by errors on a global scale. Numerous studies have demonstrated that student nurses have a significant rate of errors, and those with limited clinical experience are particularly at risk in fundamental areas such as medication administration, asepsis, and patient identification. Increasing patient numbers, short stays, rapid turnover, and the intense pace of clinics negatively impact student nurses' ability to provide safe care, prompting both educators and students to seek stronger pedagogical solutions.

This is where simulation-based training comes into play. Simulation is emerging as a contemporary teaching approach that enables students to develop their clinical skills, communication, decision-making, and self-efficacy in a risk-free, safe, and structured environment. It is increasingly being used because it supports knowledge and skill transfer, reduces fear and anxiety, strengthens self-confidence, and provides the opportunity to experience errors. In-situ simulation and standardized patient practice offer strong potential for reducing students' error proneness by providing an experience closest to real-world clinical situations. However, the lack of a study in the literature examining the effects of these two methods, particularly on the medical error proneness and attitudes of final-year nursing students, is a significant gap.

This study aims to strengthen a critical area of nursing education. The aim is to evaluate the impact of in-situ simulation and standardized patient practice on final-year nursing students' medical error proneness and attitudes toward medical errors and to reveal how they transform students' competencies in providing safe care.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Conditions

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Adnan Menderes University

Aydin, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location contact

Selçuk Görücü

CONTACT

[email protected]

+9005079554505

Selçuk Görücü

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Students were included in the study if they were:

  • A senior nursing student at Aydın Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Nursing
  • Volunteering to participate in the study
  • Not absent at any time during the study period
  • Working/not working as a nurse

Exclusion criteria

  • Graduated from a health vocational high school
  • Admitted through the Foreign Student Exam (YÖS)
  • Graduated from a health-related associate's degree program and then enrolled in the nursing department through the Vertical Transfer Exam (DGS)
  • Students who did not wish to participate in the study were excluded from the study.

Treatment and study plan

Standardized patient

Other

Group 1 receives training in a simulation laboratory environment using standard patient interventions.

İn-situ simulation

Other

Group 2 receives training in a real hospital setting through on-site simulations and standardized patient interventions.

Primary outcomes

  1. Medical error tendency scale scores of final-year nursing students

    Time frame: From registration to week 8 of intervention

    Medical Error Tendency Scale

    The minimum possible score is 1, and the maximum is 5. While the scale does not have a cutoff point, an increase in the mean score indicates a low tendency for the nurse to make medical errors, while a decrease in the mean score indicates a high tendency to make errors.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Medical error attitude scale scores of final year nursing students

    Time frame: From registration to week 8 of intervention

    Medical Error Attitude Scale

    The total scale score is calculated by dividing the total score by the number of items. The cutoff point is set at 3. Healthcare personnel scoring below 3 on the scale are considered incompetent.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Selçuk Görücü

CONTACT

[email protected]

+9005079554505

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Selçuk Görücü

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Effect of In-Situ Simulation and Standardized Patient Practice on Medical Error Tendencies and Attitudes of Senior Nursing Students

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jan 16, 2026
Registry last updated
Jan 16, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.