Significance of Peritoneal Washing Cytology Before and After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Esophagogastric-junction Cancer

• Background:

The prevalence of gastroesophageal-junction cancer is increasing in Denmark with more than 400 patients per year. The 5-year overall survival is less than 10% for the 2/3 of the patients, which are not considered resectable. Even for the 1/3, which is treated with surgical intervention and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the overall-survival is approximately 30%.

The current Danish intended curative treatment consist of esophagectomy a.m. Ivor Lewis with extended lymphadenectomy in the abdomen and thorax. Furthermore, perioperative chemotherapy consists of 6 series neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Unresectable patients receive palliative chemotherapy and no resection.

Peritoneal washing cytology is a recommended prediagnostic modality in gastric cancer. The method is used to detect free peritoneal cancer cells in the abdominal cavity, even when macroscopic carcinomatosis is not present.

Carcinomatosis can be found in up to 19% in gastric cancer patients, often in the peritoneum. Positive peritoneal cytology (C1) can be identified in up to 7% of gastric cancer patients without metastases (C1M0). Lots of studies indicate that C1-disease is an independent prognostic predictor for decreased survival, and increased recurrence rate, comparable with M1 patients (i.e. patients with distant metastases).

The American Joint Committee on cancer recommends that C1 patients should be treated non-surgically - even when M1 disease is not identified.

On the basis of the above, PWC can be used to identify patients at greater risk for recurrence, and thereby not candidates for intended curative treatment.

It is a fact, though, that C1M0 patients have a better survival than C1M1 patients. Currently, there is no level-1 evidence supporting specific treatment of C1M0 patients, why further research is required to approach this patient group in the most comprehensive way. Therefore, the focus group of our study is C1M0 patients, because of the differences in opinions. Furthermore, most evidence is based on gastric carcinomas, why GEJ-cancer patients are the group, we will examine.

Results from other investigators regarding treatment of C1M0 patients:

Lee et al. found a median survival of 21 months and 4 months in gastrectomized versus non-gastrectomized patients. Lorentzen et al. found a median 5-year survival of 71,4% and 25% in gastrectomized patients, who had C1 at staging laparoscopy and converted after preoperative chemotherapy versus persistent C1-disease after preoperative chemotherapy.

Another interesting treatment modality for C1M0 patients is extensive intraperitoneal lavage (EIPL) examined by a Japanese study group. 88 C1M0 patients were randomized into three group; 1. Gastrectomy only, 2. Gastrectomy + intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC), and 3. Gastrectomy + IPC + EIPL. Group 3 compared to group 2 had a significant better 5 year overall survival of 43,8% versus 4,6% (p<0,0001).

Further research is required to establish specific guideline for C1M0 patients.

• Purpose:

Peritoneal washing cytology (PWC) is performed as a standard prediagnostic modality at Rigshospitalet for patients, with gastric- and GEJ cancer, considered resectable at preceding multidisciplinary conference. Most studies in the past 20-years have focused on gastric cancer, and not specifically GEJ-cancer.

This study will determine the usefulness of peritoneal washing cytology, and thereby, verify our own standard regarding GEJ-cancer. Furthermore, we will determine the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on free peritoneal tumor cells, correlated with overall survival.

See outcome measures for more detailed description. This study is intended as a validation of our own standard.

• Methods

Our current algorithm includes peritoneal washings performed at two different time points:

A. Staging laparoscopy using one port technique

o After pneumoperitoneum and oversight of the abdomen is established, a puncture is created subhepatically in the midclavicular line with a pigtail catheter ch. 10.

• 500ml of sterile 37°C NaCl is injected through the catheter and manually dispersed throughout the abdomen by positioning the operating table in different positions.
• At least 200ml of fluid is aspirated subhepatically through the catheter.
• 100ml is analysed by an experienced pathologist for any malignant cancer cells.

B. Initially, before operation (transthoracic esophagectomy): either open operation or robot assisted o Robot assisted: same technique as above o Open operation: • After abdominal incision and exploration 500ml °C of sterile NaCl is manually dispersed in the abdominal cavity.

• Peritoneal washings is aspirated subhepatically
• Further algorithm as described above
• Recruiting of patients:

90 consecutive patients with biopsy verified GEJ-cancer will be included. Because PWC is already a standard guideline for this group of patients at Rigshospitalet, there will be no direct inclusion of patients.

• Study design: Prospective feasibility study. Patients considered candidates for intented curative therapy, according to The Danish Esophagus-,GEJ- and Gastric Cancer Association (DECV), is included. Furthermore, patients must have undergone evaluation of a multidisciplinary panel of specialist including the specialties surgical gastroenterology, thoracic surgery, oncology, pathology, radiology, and clinical nuclear medicine.

• Data: Patient data will be obtained from internal systems of Rigshospitalet including OPUS, LABKA, PatologiWEB, and ORBIT.

The following preoperative data will be obtained:

• age, sex, initial symptoms, tumour staging (TNM version 7) and histology characteristics, disease anamnesis, chemotherapy treatment, medicine anamnesis, comorbidity, postoperative complications, mortality, specifics regarding PWC such as injected volume of NaCl, procedure time, aspirated amount of fluid, and cytology findings.

• Approval: Authorization of data retreatment is approved by The Danish Data Protection Agency.

Approval of The Danish Ethics Committee has not been applied, because the study is a validation of our own standard guideline.

• Finances:

The following contributors have financed the study:

The Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Mogens Andreasen Fonden, Familien Erichsens familiefond, and Rigshospitalet.

All expenses have been covered.

• Results Both negative and positive results will be published in a national and/or international journal.

• Practical feasibility The relevant patients and the medical expertise are to find at the surgical gastroenterology department of Rigshospitalet. 120 staging laparoscopies are being performed per year in the handling of gastric cancer patients. Persons and departments involved in the study have agreed to allocate time and resources to the study. Furthermore, our department has a technician affiliated with our institution on full time basis, who is going to provide development, optimization, and assistance of projects associated with GEJ-cancer.

Inclusion criteria

• patients with biopsy verified GEJ-cancer referred to the department of surgical gastroenterology, Rigshospitalet, which is considered resectable at MDT-conference.
• >18 years old
• informed consent

Exclusion criteria

• < 18 years old
• Not informed consent