Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00721279

Sifrol (Pramipexole) Onset of Action and Impact: a 12-weeks Observational Study in Patients With Primary Restless Legs Syndrome

The objectives of the Post Market Surveillance (PMS) study are to evaluate the treatment effect of pramipexole on Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) severity as measured by International Restless Legs Rating Scale and Global Clinical Impression - Improvement, to evaluate the time to reaching maintenance dose of pramipexole

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site, Absam, Austria

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Primary Restless Legs Syndrome (i.e. idiopathic RLS)
  • Indication for treatment with pramipexole
  • Male or female patients older than 18 years

Exclusion criteria

  • Any contraindications according to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC): hypersensitivity to pramipexole or to any of the excipients
  • Current treatment with pramipexole

Treatment and study plan

Sifrol® (pramipexole dihydrochloride)

Drug

Primary outcomes

  1. Frequency Analysis for Baseline Pattern of RLS Symptoms

    Time frame: Baseline

    Severity of RLS was rated using the International RLS Severity Scale. This scale measures the severity of RLS symptoms and comprises of 10 questions with 5 possible answers, each answer scored from 0-4 points and is classified into 5 RLS severity groups: 0 points = no symptoms, 1-10 points = mild, 11-20 points = moderate, 21-30 points = severe, 31-40 points = very severe.

  2. Change in Total Scores of IRLS (International Restless Legs Rating Scale)

    Time frame: Baseline and final visit (week12)

    The International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS) is a rating scale used to assess the severity of RLS symptoms. The IRLS consists of 10 items, each of which is rated from 0 to 4 points, higher values denoting an increased severity of symptoms. Maximum total score is 40. Score totals are grouped into four levels of severity: 1-10 points = mild RLS, 11-20 points = moderate RLS, 21-30 points = severe RLS, and 31-40 = very severe RLS.

    The change from baseline was calculated as baseline minus the week 12 value.

  3. Change in Global Clinical Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Scale

    Time frame: baseline and final visit (week 12)

    The Clinical Global Impression Improvement scale (CGI-I) requires the clinician to rate how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state. A patient's illness is compared to change over time and rated as: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, or very much worse

  4. Frequency of Adverse Events

    Time frame: Up to 16 weeks

    Frequency of patients with any adverse event, causally related adverse events and serious adverse events

  5. Correlation of the Change in IRLS at End of Titration and at Final Visit

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks

    Correlation of the change in IRLS at end of titration and at final visit

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Boehringer Ingelheim

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Sifrol Onset of Action and Impact: a 12-weeks Observational Study in Patients With Primary RLS

Important dates

Study start
2007
Primary completion
2008
First posted
Jul 24, 2008
Registry last updated
Jun 4, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.