Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Ankara, 06010, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT07475689
Lumbar facet joint-mediated chronic low back pain is a common cause of disability. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the lumbar medial branches is an established interventional pain treatment. Different cannula designs may influence lesion geometry and clinical outcomes.
This prospective randomized study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of conventional cannulas and sidekick cannulas used during lumbar medial branch radiofrequency ablation. Patients with chronic lumbar facet joint pain who meet inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to receive RFA using either a conventional cannula or a sidekick cannula technique.
The primary objective is to evaluate pain reduction following the procedure. Secondary outcomes include functional improvement and duration of pain relief during follow-up.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ankara, 06010, Turkey (Türkiye)
Chronic low back pain related to lumbar facet joints is a frequent clinical problem in pain medicine. Lumbar medial branch radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is widely used for the treatment of facet-mediated pain when diagnostic blocks are positive.
Cannula design and electrode orientation may affect lesion size and nerve capture during RFA. The sidekick cannula has been developed to optimize lesion orientation relative to the target nerve and potentially improve procedural efficiency and clinical outcomes compared with conventional cannulas.
This prospective randomized clinical study is conducted to compare the effectiveness of conventional cannulas and sidekick cannulas in lumbar medial branch radiofrequency ablation.
Eligible adult patients with chronic lumbar facet joint-mediated pain confirmed by diagnostic medial branch blocks will be enrolled. Participants will be randomly allocated to one of two groups: RFA performed with a conventional cannula or RFA performed with a sidekick cannula.
Pain intensity, functional outcomes, and treatment response will be evaluated during follow-up visits. The results of this study aim to determine whether cannula design influences procedural success and clinical outcomes in lumbar medial branch radiofrequency ablation.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Age ≥18 years
Exclusion criteria
Lumbar medial branch radiofrequency ablation performed for chronic lumbar facet-mediated pain. The procedure is performed under fluoroscopic guidance .
Triamcinolone acetonide administered after ablation as part of the post-procedural injection mixture.
Bupivacaine 0.5% administered after ablation as part of the post-procedural injection mixture.
standard straight radiofrequency cannula used during lumbar medial branch radiofrequency ablation
sidekick radiofrequeny cannula designed to preduce a larger lesion during lumbaar brach medial branch radiofrequeny ablation
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Change in pain intensity measured by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain intensity will be measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
Time frame: 6 months
Functional status will be assessed using the Modified Oswestry Disability Index (MODI), a validated questionnaire evaluating disability related to low back pain. The MODI consists of 10 items with a total score ranging from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate greater disability and worse functional status. Changes in MODI scores will be evaluated during follow-up after lumbar medial branch radiofrequency ablation using conventional or sidekick cannulas.
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gulhane Tip Fakultesi
Other
Clinical Outcomes of Conventional Versus Sidekick Cannulas in Lumbar Medial Branch Radiofrequency Ablation: A Prospective Randomized Study
Acronym: SIDE-RFA
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04822753
Back Pain, Facet Joint Pain; Low Back Pain
Fort Liberty, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06786611
Back Pain, Facet Joint Disease
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07036653
Arthritis, Back Pain
View Trial DetailsNCT04246281
Back Pain, Low Back Pain
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
View Trial Details