Jordan University Hospital
Amman, Select One, 11831, Jordan
NCT Number: NCT03921190
To study the patients' and dentists' perception of receiving/ administering maxillary buccal infiltration anesthesia using an open or closed mouth techniques
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Amman, Select One, 11831, Jordan
Background: Local anesthesia is an essential part of dentistry. The most commonly used technique to anesthetise maxillary posterior teeth is buccal infiltration with a local anesthetic agent. The technique described in the literature focuses on the location of injection, the direction of the needle insertion in relation to the root apex, the direction of needle bevel in relation to the cortical bone plate, the size of needle and the type and amount of the local anesthetic agent used. However, there is no mention to whether the patient should open their mouth or maintain their teeth in intercuspation during the injection procedure.
Aims: This research aims to a) compare two techniques of injection (open and closed-mouth techniques) in terms of the discomfort experienced by patients during the injection procedure and b) evaluate the dentists' preference in performing either of the two techniques.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients scheduled for a dental procedure that requires local anesthesia will be given the injection using two 2 techniques; an open-mouth and closed-mouth techniques
Time frame: 5 minutes after receiving the injection
Pain perception during local anesthesia injection on a standard 100mm visual analogue scale (VAS) where zero indicates no pain at all and 100 indicates intolerable pain/ worst imagined pain (scale attached in the protocol section). The average scores were calculated for each group and compared. Higher values indicated higher pain/ discomfort experienced during the injection procedure.
Time frame: 30-60 days
Participating dentists were asked to rate the visibility of injection site and ease of cheek retraction during injection on a standard 100mm visual analogue scale where 100 indicates the best possible visibility/ easiest cheek retraction and 0 means no visibility at all/ most difficult cheek retraction. The mean scores were compared between the 2 groups using independent t-test.
Time frame: 3-60 days
Number of dentists preferring each technique
University of Jordan
Other
Should Maxillary Buccal Infiltration Anesthesia be Given in a Closed Mouth Technique? - a Clinical Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04546113
Agnosia, Analgesia
Paris, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06386575
Agnosia, Analgesia
Konya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04498923
Agnosia, Anesthesia
Rivne, Rivne Oblast, Ukraine
View Trial DetailsNCT04452656
Agnosia, Analgesia
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial Details