Biospecimen Collection
ProcedureUndergo collection of blood samples
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection
NCT Number: NCT05929768
This phase III trial compares the effects of shorter chemotherapy (chemo)-immunotherapy without anthracyclines to usual chemo-immunotherapy for the treatment of early-stage triple negative breast cancer. Paclitaxel is in a class of medications called anti-microtubule agents. It stops cancer cells from growing and dividing and may kill them. Carboplatin is in a class of medications known as platinum-containing compounds. It works in a way similar to the anticancer drug cisplatin, but may be better tolerated than cisplatin. Carboplatin works by killing, stopping or slowing the growth of cancer cells. Cyclophosphamide is in a class of medications called alkylating agents. It works by damaging the cell's deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and may kill cancer cells. It may also lower the body's immune response. Docetaxel is in a class of medications called taxanes. It stops cancer cells from growing and dividing and may kill them. Doxorubicin is an anthracycline chemotherapy drug that damages DNA and may kill cancer cells. Pembrolizumab may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Shorter treatment without anthracycline chemotherapy may work the same as the usual anthracycline chemotherapy treatment for early-stage triple negative breast cancer.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Instituto Nacional De Cancerologia de Mexico, Mexico City, Tlalpan, Mexico
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To assess whether participants with early stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) randomized to receive anthracycline-free, taxane-platinum neoadjuvant chemotherapy with pembrolizumab have non-inferior breast cancer event-free survival (BC-EFS) compared to participants randomized to taxane-platinum-anthracycline neoadjuvant chemotherapy with pembrolizumab.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare pathological complete response (pCR) and residual cancer burden (RCB) rates by randomized arm.
II. To compare pCR and RCB rates between randomized arms by tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) status.
III. To compare BC-EFS between randomized arms in the TIL-enriched and non-TIL enriched subgroups.
IV. To compare distant relapse-free survival and overall survival by randomized arm.
V. To compare invasive breast cancer-free survival after surgery between randomized arms in pCR and residual disease groups.
VI. To compare the safety and tolerability by randomized arm among those that initiate therapy.
TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE OBJECTIVE:
I. To evaluate concordance and accuracy of an automated stromal TIL (sTIL) algorithm versus (vs.) central pathologist assessed sTILs quantification.
PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME (PRO) OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare patient-reported fatigue at 3 weeks after the last neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) dose and, separately, at 18 months after randomization, using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue-7a in participants undergoing NAST with taxane-platinum-anthracycline chemo-immunotherapy vs taxane-platinum chemo-immunotherapy. (Quality of Life, Primary) II. To compare physical function experienced by participants undergoing neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy (NAST) with taxane-platinum-anthracycline chemo-immunotherapy vs taxane-platinum chemo-immunotherapy, within 3-5 weeks post last neoadjuvant systemic therapy dose using the PROMIS-29 Profile physical function subscale score. (Quality of Life, Secondary) III. To compare physical function experienced by participants undergoing NAST taxane-platinum-anthracycline chemo-immunotherapy vs taxane-platinum chemo-immunotherapy at 18 months post registration using the PROMIS-29 Profile physical function subscale score. (Quality of Life, Secondary) IV. To compare other PROMIS-29 Profile subscale scores (sleep disturbance, depression, anxiety, social, pain interference, and pain sensitivity) and GP5 question response by arm within 3-5 weeks post last neoadjuvant systemic therapy dose and at 18 months post registration. (Quality of Life, Exploratory) V. To compare the GP-5 item scores by arm within 3-5 weeks post last neoadjuvant systemic therapy dose and at 18 months post registration. (Quality of Life, Exploratory) VI. To compare select patient-reported outcomes using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) by arm. (Patient-Reported Symptoms of Treatment)
BANKING OBJECTIVE:
I. To bank physical specimens and digital slides for future correlative studies.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I: Patients receive paclitaxel intravenously (IV), carboplatin IV, and pembrolizumab IV on study. Patients then receive doxorubicin IV, cyclophosphamide IV, and pembrolizumab IV on study. Patients then undergo surgery. Patients may receive pembrolizumab after surgery. Patients may optionally undergo collection of blood samples throughout the trial.
ARM II: Patients receive docetaxel IV, carboplatin IV, and pembrolizumab IV on study. Patients then undergo surgery. Patients may receive pembrolizumab after surgery. Patients may optionally undergo collection of blood samples throughout the trial.
Patients are followed up every 6 months for the first 2 years and then annually until 5 years from registration.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Undergo collection of blood samples
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection
Given IV
Other names: Blastocarb, Carboplat, Carboplatin Hexal, Carboplatino, Carboplatinum, Carbosin, Carbosol, Carbotec, CBDCA, Displata, Ercar, JM-8, Nealorin, Novoplatinum, Paraplatin, Paraplatin AQ, Paraplatine, Platinwas, Ribocarbo
Given IV
Other names: (-)-Cyclophosphamide, 2H-1,3,2-Oxazaphosphorine, 2-[bis(2-chloroethyl)amino]tetrahydro-, 2-oxide, monohydrate, Carloxan, Ciclofosfamida, Ciclofosfamide, Cicloxal, Clafen, Claphene, CP monohydrate, CTX, CYCLO-cell, Cycloblastin, Cycloblastine, Cyclophospham, Cyclophosphamid monohydrate, Cyclophosphamide Monohydrate, Cyclophosphamidum, Cyclophosphan, Cyclophosphane, Cyclophosphanum, Cyclostin, Cyclostine, Cytophosphan, Cytophosphane, Cytoxan, Fosfaseron, Genoxal, Genuxal, Ledoxina, Mitoxan, Neosar, Revimmune, Syklofosfamid, WR- 138719
Given IV
Other names: Docecad, RP56976, Taxotere, Taxotere Injection Concentrate
Given IV
Other names: Adriablastin, Hydroxydaunomycin, Hydroxyl Daunorubicin, Hydroxyldaunorubicin
Given IV
Other names: Anzatax, Asotax, Bristaxol, Praxel, Taxol, Taxol Konzentrat
Given IV
Other names: Keytruda, Lambrolizumab, MK-3475, SCH 900475
Ancillary studies
Other names: Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Undergo surgery
Other names: Operation, Surgery, Surgery Type, Surgery, NOS, Surgical, Surgical Intervention, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Procedures, Type of Surgery
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Time from randomization to the earliest occurrence of any of the following events: progression prior to surgery, invasive recurrence after surgery, new contralateral breast cancer, or death due to any cause. New non-breast primaries are not included as events. BC-EFS will be compared between the treatment arms using Cox regression with adjustment for nodal status and sTIL enrichment.
Time frame: From date of randomization to date of the earliest occurrence of any of the following events: progression prior to surgery, invasive recurrence after surgery, new contralateral breast cancer, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 5 years
pCR rates by assigned treatment arm will be compared using a difference of two proportions overall and by stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL) group. Additionally, a multivariable logistic regression model will estimate the odds ratio for treatment adjusting for nodal status and sTIL group.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
RCB 0/I rates (i.e., RCB-0 and RCB-I combined) by assigned treatment arm will be compared using a difference of two proportions overall and by sTIL group. Additionally, a multivariable logistic regression model will estimate the odds ratio for treatment adjusting for nodal status and sTIL group.
Time frame: From date of randomization to date of invasive distant disease recurrence or death due to any cause, assessed up to 5 years
DRFS will be compared by treatment arms using Cox regression for treatment adjusted by nodal status and sTIL status.
Time frame: From date of randomization to date of death due to any cause, assessed up to 5 years
OS will be compared by treatment arms using Cox regression for treatment adjusted by nodal status and sTIL status.
Time frame: From date of randomization to date of invasive distant disease recurrence or death due to breast cancer or its treatment, assessed up to 5 years
DRFI will be compared by treatment arms using Cox regression for treatment adjusted by nodal status and sTIL status. Deaths not due to breast cancer will be considered competing risks in this analysis. Cumulative incidence curves will describe the two arms over the follow-up period from randomization.
Time frame: From time of surgery to date of invasive distant disease recurrence or death due to breast cancer or its treatment, assessed up to 5 years
RFS measured from time of surgery will compare treatment arms in a Cox regression for patients who had pCR. Nodal status and sTIL status will be included as covariates if there are sufficient numbers of events for the analysis. The expectation is that invasive breast cancer-free survival after pCR should not differ by treatment assignment.
Time frame: From time of surgery to date of invasive distant disease recurrence or death due to breast cancer or its treatment, assessed up to 5 years
RFS measured from time of surgery will compare treatment arms in a Cox regression for patients who did not have a pCR. Nodal status and sTIL status will be included as covariates.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Rates of adverse events will be compared between treatment arms for those initiating the assigned therapy.
Time frame: Up to 18 months
Participant-reported fatigue will be compared between treatment arms using the Participant-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1.0 - Fatigue 7a at 3 weeks after the last neoadjuvant systemic therapy dose and at 18 months after randomization. The PROMIS Fatigue-7a is a validated 7-item questionnaire that assesses participant-reported fatigue in the past 7 days. Raw scores are converted to T-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher T-scores indicate more fatigue.
Time frame: Up to 5 weeks after the last neoadjuvant systemic therapy dose
Participant-reported physical function will be compared between treatment arms using the PROMIS-29 Profile v2.1 physical function subscale score at 3-5 weeks after the last neoadjuvant systemic therapy dose. The PROMIS-29 Profile is a validated 29-item questionnaire that assesses participant-reported symptoms in 9 domains. Raw scores for each subscale are converted to T-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. This outcome will be assessed using the 4-item physical functioning subscale. Higher T-scores indicate greater physical function.
Time frame: Up to 18 months
Participant-reported physical function will be compared between treatment arms using the PROMIS-29 Profile v2.1 physical function subscale score at 18 months after randomization. The PROMIS-29 Profile is a validated 29-item questionnaire that assesses participant-reported symptoms in 9 domains. Raw scores for each subscale are converted to T-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. This outcome will be assessed using the 4-item physical functioning subscale. Higher T-scores indicate greater physical function.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Alicia Aranda
CONTACT
Dana Sparks
CONTACT
SWOG Cancer Research Network
Network
Shorter Anthracycline-Free Chemo Immunotherapy Adapted to Pathological Response in Early Triple Negative Breast Cancer (SCARLET), A Randomized Phase III Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06324240
Anatomic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05379153
Anatomic Stage 0 Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02918474
Adenocarcinoma, Anatomic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05417308
Anatomic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial Details