Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05781217

Short Versus Long-term Androgen Deprivation Therapy With Salvage Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer. URONCOR 0624

The optimal indication for ADT has long been a point of controversy, at least until the results of randomised trials comparing RT with and without ADT were published. NCCN guidelines and most retrospective series and left the decision to prescribe ADT in combination with RT to the discretion of the treating physician, despite a lack of clear scientific evidence to support this recommendation. The percentage of patients in those retrospective series who received hormone therapy ranged from 33% to 71%, but generally involved patients with adverse prognostic factors (Gleason score > 7, stage pT3-T4, PSA > 1 ng/mL in cases with biochemical recurrence [BCR], and PSA doubling time [PSA-DT] < 6 months). Despite the heterogeneity in those studies in terms of treatment duration, RT dose, and treatment volumes, most of the studies found that ADT significantly prolonged biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS), especially in patients with PSA levels > 1 ng/mL at recurrence.

The results of two randomised trials evaluating SRT with or without ADT were published in 2017, with both trials demonstrating a benefit for ADT in this clinical setting. A follow-up study confirmed the value of ADT in combination with SRT in terms of better PFS and, in the RTOG study, an improvement in overall survival (OS). Despite the lack of data from phase III trials regarding the influence of PSA-DT, the BRFS interval, and the Gleason score in terms of their effects on the clinical course of patients who develop BCR, there is strong evidence from other studies to support the use of these variables (together with age and comorbidities). Given the available evidence, we believe that these variables should be considered when determining the indications for ADT.

In line with the philosophy underlying the approach used by D'Amico to develop a risk classification system for prostate cancer patients at diagnosis, we propose three risk groups. According to Pollack et al. and Spratt et al., low-risk patients would not benefit from hormone therapy, especially long-term ADT, due to the deleterious effects of such treatment. By contrast, intermediate and high risk patients would be candidates for ADT combined with RT. However, the optimal duration of ADT in these patients (6 months vs. 2 years) remains undefined and needs to be determined prospectively in a randomised trial, similar to the approach used in the DART 05.01 trial.

SRT and ADT are widely used in routine clinical practice to treat patients who develop BCR after prostatectomy. In this context, we intend to perform a multicentre, phase III trial to define the optimal duration of ADT (6 vs. 24 months).

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Instituto Catalán de Oncología Hospitalet, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with histologically-confirmed prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. Patients who have not undergone lymph node dissection are eligible for inclusion.
  • Biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy: BCR is defined as a PSA value ≥ 0.2 ng/mL, with at least one confirmatory PSA determination ≥ two weeks after the first test (the confirmatory PSA level must be higher than the initial value). Patients with Gleason 8-10, pT3b or R1 are eligible for inclusion in the trial with PSA ≥ 0.15 ng/mL; however, in patients with PSA > 0.4 ng/mL, imaging tests (conventional CT and bone scans or advanced imaging techniques such as PSMA or choline PET/CT) should be performed to check for metastases. In patients with PSA levels between 0.15 and 0.4 ng/mL, no further tests are required to check for distant metastases prior to inclusion.
  • Intermediate and high-risk patients according to the classification criteria proposed by González San Segundo et al. (18):

CHARACTERISTICS INTERMEDIATE RISK (≥ 2) HIGH RISK(≥ 1)

PSA at diagnosis, ng/mL 0.6-1.0 ≥1.0 PSA doubling time, months 6-12 < 6 GLEASON / ISUP 7/3 ≥8/≥4 TNM (prostatectomy specimen) pT2-3a pN0-Mx pT3b pN0-Mx Time to biochemical recurrence, months >18 <18 Margins Positive Positive

  • Testosterone level > 150 ng/dL at inclusion
  • ECOG 0-1
  • Life expectancy > 5 years
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Presence of pN1 disease in the original surgical specimen
  • Presence of macroscopic disease on imaging tests. If the PSA at diagnosis is > 0.4 ng/mL, then imaging tests (CT and bone scan and/or PET/CT or body magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) are required.
  • PSA <0.2 or <0.15 ng/mL (if Gleason score=10, pT3b, or R1 in the radical prostatectomy specimen).
  • Previous pelvic radiotherapy
  • Radiotherapy contraindicated
  • Ongoing treatment with ADT or PSA-modulating drugs (e.g., finasteride, dutasteride, high dose steroids)
  • Inability to understand the treatment protocol or sign informed consent

Treatment and study plan

triptorelin, goserelin, leuprorelin

Drug

ADT will consist of LHRH analogues (triptorelin, goserelin, leuprorelin) with bicalutamide 50 mg/day started 10 days before the first ADT injection to avoid LHRH-related flare-ups. Bicalutamide will be discontinued after 30 days. The LHRH analogue will be initiated prior to the start of radiotherapy and administered for 6 or 24 months depending on treatment allocation. The maximum time permitted between randomisation and administration of the first LHRH dose is 30 days. The maximum time from the first LHRH dose to the start of SRT is 60 days.

Primary outcomes

  1. To compare 5-year MFS rates in prostate cancer patients treated with long- versus short-term ADT in combination with salvage radiotherapy

    Time frame: 5 years

    Distant metastasis-free survival: time from administration of the first LHRH analogue (this same starting point applies to all secondary objectives) until the patient develops M1a disease (involved retroperitoneal lymph nodes) or M1b-c disease (bone/visceral involvement) according to RECIST 1.1 criteria based on conventional computed tomography (CT) imaging and bone scans. The use of advanced molecular imaging-PSMA or choline positron-emission tomography (PET)/CT-is subject to the centre-specific protocols in place at the participating hospitals; however, metastatic progression will be determined according to RECIST 1.1 criteria based on conventional imaging tests.

Secondary outcomes

  1. To compare the two study arms in terms of the Biochemical-relapse free interval

    Time frame: 5 years

    BRFS: time to biochemical progression defined as an increase in PSA confirmed by a second PSA determination (0.2 ng/mL above the salvage radiotherapy nadir or a sustained elevation in PSA levels).

  2. To compare the two study arms in terms of the Pelvic progression-free survival

    Time frame: 5 years

    Pelvic PFS: time to local recurrence (prostate bed) and/or N1 disease (positive lymph nodes below the aortic bifurcation) according to RECIST 1.1 criteria by conventional CT imaging and bone scan. The use of advanced molecular imaging (PSMA or choline PET/CT) will depend on centre-specific protocols; determination of metastatic progression will be based on RECIST 1.1 criteria from conventional imaging tests.

  3. To compare the two study arms in terms of the Time to start of cytotoxic treatment

    Time frame: 5 years

    Cytotoxic treatment-free interval: time to the start of the first cytotoxic treatment or local treatment for oligorecurrence.

  4. To compare the two study arms in terms of the Time to castration resistance

    Time frame: 5 years

    Time interval to castration resistance: the time to biochemical and/or clinical progression with castration levels (testosterone < 50 ng/dL). Progression to castration resistance is defined as three consecutive increases in PSA (one-week intervals) with at least two PSA increases > 2 ng/mL and a 50% increase over the PSA nadir, progression of bone lesions (≥ two lesions on the bone scan), progression of soft tissue lesions (RECIST 1.1 criteria), or the development of ≥ one soft tissue or visceral metastases (including lymph nodes).

  5. To compare the two study arms in terms of the Cancer-specific survival

    Time frame: 5 years

    time to death due to prostate cancer or treatment-related complications

  6. To compare the two study arms in terms of the Overall survival

    Time frame: 5 years

    time to death from any cause

  7. To compare the two study arms in terms of the Acute and late toxicity

    Time frame: 5 years

    Acute toxicity: toxicity (CTCAE criteria, v. 4.0; https://evs.nci.nih.gov) appearing any time from treatment initiation up to three months after completion of RT.

  8. To compare the two study arms in terms of the Late toxicity

    Time frame: 5 years

    -Late toxicity: from 3 months to 5 years after completing RT (CTCAE v 4.0).

  9. To compare the two study arms in terms of Quality of life (QoL)

    Time frame: 5 years

    Quality of life (QoL): from baseline (prior to RT) to five years after completion of RT, assessed with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PR25 questionnaires.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Pablo Raña, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

0034696633409

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Instituto de Investigación en Oncología Radioterápica - Fundación Española de Oncología Radioterápic

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Short Versus Long-term Androgen Deprivation Therapy Combined With Salvage Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer Patients With Biochemical Recurrence After Prostatectomy: a Multicentre Phase III Randomised Controlled Trial

Acronym: URONCOR 06-24

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2032
First posted
Mar 23, 2023
Registry last updated
Nov 18, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.