Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05538416

Short-term Clinical Outcome of Cortical Bone Trajectory Compared With the Traditional "Open" and Minimal Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

A combined prospective cohort study and retrospective analysis of previously collected data. Three different techniques for posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) are compared: CBT-PLIF, MI-PLIF and open PLIF. A total of 180 patients are included, who will be followed up to 6 weeks postoperatively.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

About this study

A combined prospective cohort study for CBT-PLIF and retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the MISOS study, regarding traditional open PLIF and MI-PLIF. A total of 180 patients will be included in the study: 60 prospective CBT-PLIF patients, 60 retrospective open PLIF patients and 60 retrospective MI-PLIF patients.

The new data will be collected prospectively by means of questionnaires. No biomaterial will be collected. The included patients will be asked to complete questionnaires before surgery, 2 and 6 weeks after surgery. In addition, VAS scores will be noted throughout the hospital stay, 2 and 6 weeks after surgery.

Inclusion criteria

Patients aged 18-75 years with neurogenic claudication and/or radicular leg pain due to low-grade (Meyerding grades l and ll) degenerative or spondylolytic spondylolisthesis with persistent symptoms for more than 3 months.

Exclusion criteria

previous spinal fusion surgery at the same level, osteoporosis (only when using bisphosphonate), active infection or previous infection at the surgical site, active cancer, spondylolisthesis grade III or greater, more than one symptomatic level requiring fusion, pregnancy, contraindication to surgery, severe mental or psychiatric disorder, substance abuse, insufficient knowledge of the Dutch language and morbid obesity (body mass index >40).

Main research question: Does the CBT-PLIF provide less low back pain in the short term than the traditional open PLIF and the MI-PLIF?

Primary outcome measure

  • Low back pain measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 2 weeks after surgery Secondary Outcomes
  • Low back pain during hospitalization (measured every day), 2 and 6 weeks after surgery
  • Leg pain
  • Oswestry Disability Index
  • Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L)
  • Observed patient recovery
  • Other parameters such as complications, surgical parameters (intraoperative blood loss, duration of surgery), length of stay in hospital and return to work

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18-75 years
  • Degenerative or spondylolytic spondylolisthesis
  • Neurogenic claudication and/or radicular leg pain
  • Low grade (Meyerding grade l and ll)
  • Persistent complaints for over 3 months

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous spine fusion surgery at the same level
  • Osteoporosis
  • Active infection or prior infection at the surgical site
  • Active cancer
  • Spondylolisthesis grade lll or greater
  • More than one symptomatic level that needs fusion
  • Pregnancy
  • Contraindication for surgery
  • Severe mental or psychiatric disorder
  • Substance abuse
  • Inadequate knowledge of Dutch language
  • Morbid obesity (body mass index >40)

Treatment and study plan

Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF)

Procedure

Spinal fusion in the lumbar spine by inserting a cage directly into the disc space. This is an observational study in which the standard procedure/care is followed.

Primary outcomes

  1. VAS low back pain

    Time frame: 2 weeks postoperative

    VAS for low back pain ranging from 0mm (no pain) to 100mm (worst pain imaginable)

Secondary outcomes

  1. VAS low back pain

    Time frame: During hospital stay, measured each day and 6 weeks postoperative

    VAS for low back pain ranging from 0mm (no pain) to 100mm (worst pain imaginable)

  2. VAS leg pain

    Time frame: During hospital stay, measured each day, 2 and 6 weeks postoperative

    VAS for leg pain ranging from 0mm (no pain) to 100mm (worst pain imaginable)

  3. Oswestry Disability Index

    Time frame: 2 and 6 weeks postoperative

    Used to quantify the degree of functional impairment in patients with low back pain. Ranging from 0 (no disability) to 100 (bed bound)

  4. Quality of Life (QoL)

    Time frame: 2 and 6 weeks postoperative

    Measured by the EQ-5D-5L

  5. Perceived recovery of the patient

    Time frame: 2 and 6 weeks postoperative

    scored on a 7-Likert scale, with scores ranging from 'worse than ever' to 'complete recovery'

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Diane H. Steenks

CONTACT

[email protected]

050 3617976

Hui Ling Li, BsC

CONTACT

[email protected]

0629249620

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Jos M. A. Kuijlen

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Sep 13, 2022
Registry last updated
May 4, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.