Diagnostic Strategy for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Based on 4PEPS
NCT06015529
Cardiovascular Diseases, Embolism
Brussels, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT Number: NCT03915925
This is a prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study to compare right ventricular dysfunction dependent and independent prognostic models for short-term serous adverse events in patients who are diagnosed with pulmonary embolism in the emergency department. Clinical endpoints are assessed at days 1-5. A thirty-day follow-up phone call is conducted to obtain further clinical endpoints and a quality of life assessment.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
San Diego Medical Center, San Diego, California, United States
The objective of this study is to compare right ventricular dysfunction (RVD)dependent and independent prognostic models for short-term serious adverse events in pulmonary embolism (PE) patients. The target population is emergency department (ED) patients with confirmed acute PE within 12 hours of ED presentation. The primary outcome is a composite of death, delayed circulatory or respiratory dysfunction, hypoxia, and reperfusion intervention within five days of PE diagnosis. Secondary outcomes will be nonfatal bleeding, recurrence of venous thromboembolism, and hypoxia requiring oxygen supplementation.
The specific aims are: 1) determine the incidence of death, circulatory and respiratory deterioration, and administration of reperfusion therapy within five days of PE; 2) determine functional outcomes 30 days after PE using the Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life Questionnaire; 3) evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios of each RVD assessment tool for clinical deterioration within five days of PE; and 4) derive a prediction model for clinical deterioration within five days of PE diagnosis.
Patients with confirmed PE will be assessed for hemodynamic stability at presentation, and then will be assessed for RVD. Normotensive PE patients without RVD will be assessed by a clinically derived model (sPESI or HESTIA) to determine if they are low risk or intermediate-low risk. The investigators will then determine incidence of the clinical endpoints during the subsequent 5 days, as well as 30 days later. The 30-day follow-up will also include administration of the validated Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life questionnaire (PEmbQoL).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: Five days from diagnosis
Provide and compare the number and proportion of patients with both composite and individual outcome of death, circulatory deterioration, respiratory deterioration, administration of reperfusion therapy
Time frame: 5 days from diagnosis
Comparison of different Right Ventricular Dysfunction Assessments for Clinical deterioration within 5 days of PE diagnosis
Time frame: 30 days after PE diagnosis
Comparison of functional outcomes between patients with and without Right ventricular dysfunction at presentation with higher scores indicating worse outcomes THe Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life Questionnaire has six dimension of questions. Dimension scores are transformed into to scale from 0-100 with higher scores associated with worse outcomes.
Time frame: 5 days
Use of logistic regression analysis to determine predictors of clinical deteriortion a=within 5 days of acute PE presentation at emergency department
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06015529
Cardiovascular Diseases, Embolism
Brussels, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT04014972
Acute Aortic Syndrome, Aneurysm
View Trial DetailsNCT07689136
Cardiovascular Diseases, Deep Vein Thrombosis
Tunis, Tunisia
View Trial DetailsNCT06183944
Cardiovascular Diseases, Embolism
Toulon, France
View Trial Details