Early prosthesis reimplantation
ProcedureEarly prosthesis reimplantation, within 16 to 30 days after implants removal
NCT Number: NCT05642013
This study is a prospective bicentric feasibility study, which aims to evaluate the feasibility of a two-stage full implant exchange with early prosthesis reimplantation between 16 and 30 days after implants removal for hip or knee prosthetic joint infection.
This study concern 50 patients, prospectively included and compared to the last 50 patients with hip or knee PJI managed with classical two-stage implant exchange.
The duration of the study is 42 months.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
CHU de Montpellier - Hôpital Saint-Eloi, Montpellier, France
Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a rare but severe complication, with long and complex medico-surgical procedures ang high morbidity. Two-stage full implant exchange is commonly used for PJI, but the best time for prosthesis reimplantation remains unclear. Late reimplantation leads to prolonged immobilization, which can cause decubitus complications and altered joint functionnality.
The hypothesis is that reimplantation between 16 and 30 days after implants removal, earlier than suggested by some relatively old recommandations, associated with 12 weeks antibiotic therapy is a safe and efficient option, allowing shorter immobilization susceptible to improve joint functionnality.
The principal aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of a two-stage full implant exchange with early prosthesis reimplantation.
50 patients with knee or hip PJI eligible for two-stage implant exchange will be prospectively included in two french centers.
Surgical procedure will be standardized, with prothesis reimplantation within 16 to 30 days after implants removal, associated with 12 weeks adaptated antibiotherapy according to french recommendations.
Patients will be compared to the last 50 patients with hip or knee PJI managed with classical two-stage implant exchange in these centers until december 2021 (retrospective group).
Follow up consists of 7 clinical evaluations, from inclusion until month15 after prosthesis removal.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Prospective group:
A Impossibility of conservative treatment : infection occurring more than 4 weeks after prosthesis implantation, fistula, documented resistant germ, loosened prosthesis / B Unsuitable 1-stage change: recurrence after 1-stage management, precarious bone capital, documented resistant microorganism, infection without prior microbiological documentation, fistula, surgeon's assessment in disfavor
Retrospective group :
Exclusion criteria
Prospective group :
Retrospective group :
Study exit criteria
Early prosthesis reimplantation, within 16 to 30 days after implants removal
Analysis of 50 records of operated patients managed with classical two-stage implant exchange
Time frame: At 3 months follow-up
Number of eligible patients having been included in the study having benefited from the standardized protocol without major deviations / number of eligible patients according to surgeons or doctors during consultations and hospitalization in orthopedic or infectious disease departments
Time frame: At 3 months follow-up
Number of eligible patients included in the study / number of eligible patients according to surgeons or doctors during consultations and hospitalization in orthopedic or infectious disease departments
Time frame: At 15 months follow-up
Number of patients included without signs of infectious relapse to the same germ or persistence of the initial infection at M15 / number of patients included who benefited from the standardized protocol without major deviations., compared to clinical cure rate in retrospective group
Time frame: At 15 months follow-up
Number of patients who presented a reinfection according to the EBJIS criteria with a germ different from the initial organism(s) during follow-up / number of patients included who benefited from the standardized protocol without major deviations, compared to reinfection rate in retrospective group
Time frame: At 15 months follow-up
Cumulative length of stay in hospital (medicine or surgery wards) or in follow-up care compared to cumulative length of stay in retrospective group
Time frame: At 6 months follow-up
Knee Society Score or Harris Hip Score
Time frame: At 15 months follow-up
Knee Society Score or Harris Hip Score
Time frame: At inclusion
EQ-5D-5L score (auto-questionnary)
Time frame: At 3 months follow-up
EQ-5D-5L score (auto-questionnary)
Time frame: At 15 months follow-up
EQ-5D-5L score (auto-questionnary)
Time frame: From inclusion to 3 months follow-up
Evaluation of antibiotics tolerance by clinical +/- biological evaluation
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Nathalie PANSU, MD
CONTACT
Vincent LE MOING, MD PhD
CONTACT
University Hospital, Montpellier
Other
Acronym: SHIFT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07214311
Prosthetic-joint Infection
Sarasota, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07324954
Irrigation, Prosthetic-joint Infection
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06293352
Arthroplasty Complications, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06919913
Prosthetic-joint Infection
New York, United States
View Trial Details