Mohammed A. El-Sawy
Al Mansurah, 12345, Egypt
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Mohamed A. El-Sawy, PhD
CONTACT
Mohamed T. Khater, PhD
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT06666595
Objective: To report the implant survival rates, clinical, and radiographic outcomes of subcrestal short implant versus crestal standard length implant supported removable partial denture (RPD).
Interested in participating?
Request Info50 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Al Mansurah, 12345, Egypt
Location status: Recruiting
Mohamed A. El-Sawy, PhD
CONTACT
Mohamed T. Khater, PhD
CONTACT
30 individuals with at least 2 adjacent missing teeth bilaterally were included.to support class Ι RPD with conventional loading protocol were chosen for this research. Each participant received 2 implants in a split mouth design, one side received 1 subcrestal short implant and the contralateral side crestal standard length implant. Plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), radiographic crestal bone level (CBL) and implant survival rate were evaluated. at implant placement (T0), restoration delivery (T1), and 3-year follow-up after loading (T2). MBL was calculated as the change in distance from the implant-abutment interface to the first radiographically visible bone-implant contact. A repeated-measures mixed ANOVA followed by a paired Student's t-test with the Bonferroni correction was used for statistical analysis. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Placement of titanium dental implant to retain and support Kennedy class 1 removable partial denture (RPD).The implant fuses with the bone through a process called osseointegration.
Time frame: 3 years
Evaluation of crestal bone loss around implants will be performed by periapical digital radiograph using parallel technique to avoid distortion or elongation to the image.
Time frame: 3 years
Evaluation of PI around implants were assessed by using a numerical recording of BI (present = 1; absent = 0), PI (present = 1; absent = 0), as well as PD. With the use of a plastic periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, Illinois).
Time frame: 3 years
Evaluation of BOP around implants were assessed by using a numerical recording of BOP (present = 1; absent = 0), PI (present = 1; absent = 0), as well as PD. With the use of a plastic periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, Illinois).
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Mohamed T. Khater, PhD
CONTACT
Mohammed A. El-Sawy, PhD
CONTACT
Menoufia University
Other
Clinical Outcome of Subcrestal Short Implant Versus Crestal Standard Length Implant to Retain Kennedy Class 1 Removable Partial Denture: A Split-mouth Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05764733
Body Weight, Body Weight Changes
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06541548
Bone Diseases, Bone Diseases, Metabolic
Saint-Etienne, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06527664
Arthroplasty Complications, Bone Diseases
Bologna, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT04922333
Bone Diseases, Bone Diseases, Metabolic
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
View Trial Details