EarStim
DevicePatients in the active arm in Period A will wear the investigational EarStim System
NCT Number: NCT07400731
This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, two-period study designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the EarStim System for intermittent relief of motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease experiencing wearing-off phenomena. Adult patients with moderate to severe Parkinson's disease (MDS-UPDRS Part III score ≥33) receiving oral dopaminergic therapy will be enrolled. Period A is a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled phase conducted in a clinical setting. Period B is an unblinded, standard-of-care-controlled phase evaluating the effectiveness of the EarStim System during home use over 90 days.
Interested in participating?
Request Info44 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder, affecting approximately 0.3% of the general population and up to 3% of individuals over 65. It is characterized by cardinal motor symptoms such as bradykinesia, rigidity, tremor, and postural instability. While levodopa remains the gold-standard treatment, long-term use often leads to motor complications, including fluctuations between "ON" and "OFF" states. Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus is an effective intervention for motor symptoms and medication-induced complications; however, axial symptoms such as postural instability and gait disturbances remain resistant to treatment. Alternative approaches, including peripheral nerve stimulation, have been explored to modulate motor control regions of the brain, offering potential benefits for PD symptom management.
The EarStim System, developed by Stoparkinson Healthcare Systems, is a wearable, non-invasive electro-stimulator designed to target intrinsic auricular muscle zones (IAMZ). These zones are innervated by the trigeminal, facial, vagus, and C2 spinal nerves, creating connections with motor regulatory pathways in the brainstem and basal ganglia. Pilot studies suggest that high-frequency stimulation of IAMZ can alleviate PD motor symptoms beyond the stimulation period.
This study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the EarStim System for intermittent symptom relief in PD patients. The study is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, two-period, non-significant risk pivotal study involving patients with PD experiencing wearing-off phenomena. It is designed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the EarStim System for the intermittent relief of motor symptoms. The study will recruit adult patients with moderate to severe PD, defined as an MDS-UPDRS Part III score of ≥33, who are being treated with oral dopaminergic medication.
The study consists of two periods: Period A and Period B. Period A will be a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled part to assess the safety and effectiveness of the EarStim System in a clinical setting at Visit 1 (Day 0). Period B will be unblinded and controlled by a SOC arm to evaluate the effectiveness of the EarStim System in a home setting over a 90-day period.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Patients fulfilling the following criteria are eligible for participation:
*This corresponds to item 4.3 in MDS-UPDRS Part IV, where a score of 0 (zero) indicates that the subject experiences no OFF periods during the waking day, and a score of ≥1 reflects the presence of OFF periods at any level.
Exclusion criteria
Patients who meet any of the following criteria are to be excluded from participation:
Patients in the active arm in Period A will wear the investigational EarStim System
Patients in the sham arm in Period A will wear an identical device with no active stimulation, programmed in similar manner as the EarStim system
Participants in the active arm in Period A who are responders to stimulation (based on reduction in MDS-UPDRS III scores) will proceed to Period B, which takes place in a home setting.
In Period B, these responders will be assigned to "EarStim + SOC" group. They will be instructed to continue their oral dopaminergic medications as usual, and in addition, to use EarStim stimulation at home at the time of their medication intake.
Participants from the sham arm of Period A will be assigned to the "SOC" group and will continue their oral dopaminergic medications as usual, without any EarStim stimulation.
Time frame: 40 minutes
Comparison of reduction in the MDS-UPDRS Part III scores from pre-stimulation to 40 minutes post-stimulation between active and sham arms during Period A.
18 items, 0-4 rating scale (from normal to worse).
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of study at 90 days
Frequency of all adverse events
Time frame: 90 minutes
Comparison of reduction in the MDS-UPDRS Part III scores from pre-stimulation to 90 minutes post-stimulation, comparing the active and sham arms during Period A (Visit 1).
18 items, rating 0-4 score for each item (from normal to worse)
Time frame: From 30 days (Visit 2) to 90 days (Visit 4)
Mean reduction in the MDS-UPDRS Part III score from pre-stimulation to 40 minutes post-stimulation in the EarStim + SOC group compared with SOC group at Visit 2,3,4.
18 items, rating 0-4 score for each item (from normal to worse)
Time frame: 90 days
Non-inferiority of the mean reduction in the MDS-UPDRS Part III score from pre-stimulation to 40 minutes post-stimulation in the EarStim + SOC group at Visit 4 compared with the active group at Visit 1.
18 items in scale, 0-4 rating score for each item (from normal to worse)
Time frame: 40 minutes
Comparison of Patient Global Impression - Change (PGI-C) scale scores between the active and sham arms after 40 minutes of stimulation at Visit 1.
one question, response rated on a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 = Very much improved to 7 = Very much worse
Time frame: 40 minutes
Comparison of Clinical Global Impression - Change (CGI-C) scale scores between the active and sham arms after 40 minutes of stimulation at Visit 1.
One question, responses rated on a 7-point scale, from better to worse.
Time frame: From 30 days (Visit 2) to 90 days (Visit 4)
Comparison of PDQ-8 scores between the "EarStim + SOC" and "SOC" groups at Visits 2, 3, and 4.
8 item scale, responses rated for each item from 0 (never) to 4 (always), with higher scores indicating a greater impact of disease on daily life.
Time frame: From Day -1 to 90 days (Visit 4)
Comparison of PDQ-8 scores in the "EarStim + SOC" group at Visits 2, 3, and 4 versus the day before Visit 1.
8 item scale, responses rated for each item from 0 (never) to 4 (always), with higher scores indicating a greater impact of disease on daily life.
Time frame: From Day 0 (Visit 1) to Day 90 (Visit 4)
Comparison of the MDS-UPDRS Part II (Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living) scores in the "EarStim + SOC" group between Visit 4 and Visit 1.
13 items, responses for each item scored on a 0-4 rating scale (from 0: normal to worse)
Time frame: From Day 0 (Visit 1) to Day 90 (Visit 4)
Comparison of the MDS-UPDRS Part I (Non-Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living) scores in the "EarStim + SOC" group between Visit 4 and Visit 1.
13 items, responses for each item rated 0-4 (0 being normal to worse)
Time frame: From baseline up to 90 days (Visit 4)
Changes in PKG™ sleep and nighttime activity levels from pre-Visit 1 scores to the mean scores of Visits 2, 3, and 4.
Time frame: From baseline up to 90 days (Visit 4)
Changes in PKG™ motor fluctuations from pre-Visit 1 scores to the mean scores of Visits 2, 3, and 4.
Time frame: From baseline up to 90 days (Visit 4)
Changes in PKG™ bradykinesia, dyskinesia, and tremor from pre-Visit 1 scores to the mean scores of Visits 2, 3, and 4.
Time frame: From baseline up to 90 days (Visit 4)
Comparison of Wearing-off Questionnaire (WOQ-9) scores between pre-Visit 1 and Visits 2, 3, and 4.
9 items of questionnaire.
Time frame: 40 minutes
Assessment of whether the mean reduction in the MDS-UPDRS Part III score from pre-stimulation to 40 minutes post-stimulation in the active arm at Visit 1 is clinically meaningful (≥3.2 points).
18 items in scale, each item responded 0-4 rating score (from normal to worse)
Time frame: 90 minutes
Assessment of whether the mean reduction in the MDS-UPDRS Part III score from pre-stimulation to 90 minutes post-stimulation in the active arm at Visit 1 is clinically meaningful (≥3.2 points).
18 items in scale, 0-4 rating score for each item (from normal to worse)
Time frame: From Day 0 (Visit 1) up to 90 days (Visit 4)
Assessment of whether the mean reduction in the MDS-UPDRS Part III score from pre-stimulation to 40 minutes post-stimulation in "EarStim+SOC" group, combined across Visit 2,3,4 is clinically meaningful (≥3.2 points).
18 items in scale, 0-4 rating score for each item (from normal to worse)
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Stoparkinson Healthcare Systems LLC
Industry
Multicenter Study of Safety and Effectiveness of Auricular Muscle Zone Stimulation With the EarStim Novel Device for Parkinson's Disease
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07590700
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Behavior
Hatay, Antakya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07190404
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
St Louis, Missouri, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07193303
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Kahramanmaraş, Onikişubat, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07151378
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Saarlouis, Saarland, Germany
View Trial Details