Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02608723

Shock Wave Therapy: Do the External Appearance of the Device Influence Clinical Outcomes?

To check in patients suffering from chronic plantar fasciitis treated with shock wave therapy, if the outward appearance of the device affects clinical outcomes.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Rehabilitation Center "Salut i Esport"

Santa Perpètua de Gaià, Barcelona, 08130, Spain

About this study

Study Design: a controlled, randomized, parallel assessor-blinded clinical trial.

Patients suffering from chronic plantar fasciitis (duration more than 6 months) will be assigned to three different groups:

  • Group I: Treatment applied by standard shock waves device.
  • Group II: Shock wave therapy applied by a modified standard device to offer more attractive, more technical, smarter, better appearance, larger and with an expansion of external information devices more sophisticated.
  • Group III: Shock wave therapy applied by a modified standard device to offer a more austere, disfigured, unattractive, modest and smaller external appearance.

The shock waves emitted to the 3 devices will be identical; the only difference will be the external image of the device.

The main outcome will be the function of the foot by the FFI (Foot Function Index) questionnaire.

As secondary variables: pain by VAS (Visual Analogical Scale) in different situations, the plantar fascia thickness measured by ultrasound, and the perception of patient recovery measured with the Likert scale. Adverse effects, painkillers consumption and pain experienced during the treatment of shock waves were also assessed.

The patients will be followed and monitored for a month, two months and four months after treatment finished.

For the statistical analysis of clinical variables, ANOVA (analysis of variance) will be performed to check whether the evolution of patients over time was different depending on the device applied.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age greater than 18 years.
  • Being able to understand the explanations about the potential benefits and risks of study participation.
  • Diagnosis of chronic plantar fasciitis. Proven by clinical examination: Meeting at least 2 of the following criteria:
  • Tenderness in the proximal insertion of the plantar fascia (area of the medial calcaneal tuberosity).
  • Pain during the first steps to get out of bed in the morning and / or after a period of rest time.
  • With a duration of symptoms ≥ 6 months at the time of study entry.
  • Having received conservative therapy without success, at least two treatments. Treatments may have been made isolated, combined or consecutively.

Exclusion criteria

  • Bilateral plantar fasciitis.
  • Hiper/ hypothyroidism.
  • Diabetes mellitus.
  • Treatment with anticoagulants
  • Inflammatory diseases.

Treatment and study plan

Standard shock waves device

Device

3 sessions were applied: one per week. Energy flux density 0,18 mJ/mm2. Frequency: 8 Hz. 2500 shockwaves/session. The shock waves emitted to the 3 devices are identical; the only difference is the external image of the device.

Austere shock waves device

Device

3 sessions were applied: one per week. Energy flux density 0,18 mJ/mm2. Frequency: 8 Hz. 2500 shockwaves/session. The shock waves emitted to the 3 devices are identical; the only difference is the external image of the device.

Sophisticated shock waves device

Device

3 sessions were applied: one per week. Energy flux density 0,18 mJ/mm2. Frequency: 8 Hz. 2500 shockwaves/session. The shock waves emitted to the 3 devices are identical; the only difference is the external image of the device.

Primary outcomes

  1. Function of the foot

    Time frame: Four months

    FFI (Foot Function Index) questionnaire

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain

    Time frame: Four months

    VAS (Visual Analogical Scale)

  2. Plantar fascia thickness

    Time frame: Four months

    Ultrasounds

  3. Perception of patient recovery

    Time frame: Four months

    Likert scale

  4. Painkillers consumption

    Time frame: Four months

    Painkillers consumption

  5. Adverse effects

    Time frame: Four months

    Adverse effects

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Asociacion Colaboracion Cochrane Iberoamericana

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Chronic Plantar Fasciitis Treated With Shock Wave Therapy: Do the External Appearance of the Device Influence Clinical Outcomes? A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Nov 20, 2015
Registry last updated
Nov 20, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.