Barry University
Miami Shores, Florida, 33161, United States
NCT Number: NCT07706283
This study examined the effects of six weeks of magnesium L-threonate (MgT) supplementation on sleep quality, cognitive performance under experimentally induced mental fatigue, neuromuscular function, and psychophysiological outcomes in healthy adults. Biological sex and weight status were examined as pre-specified moderating variables.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–45 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Miami Shores, Florida, 33161, United States
This study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial examining the effects of six weeks of magnesium L-threonate (MgT) supplementation on cognitive performance, mental fatigue, neuromuscular function, sleep quality, and psychophysiological outcomes in healthy adults. Biological sex and weight status were examined as pre-specified moderating variables given evidence for sex-specific differences in magnesium homeostasis and the elevated prevalence of magnesium inadequacy in individuals with overweight or obesity.
Participants:
Healthy male and female adults aged 18-45 years were recruited from a local university and surrounding community. Eighty-one participants were enrolled and randomized; the final analytic sample comprised 54 participants (MgT: n = 28; PLA: n = 26) following exclusions for non-adherence, technical data malfunction, and multivariate outlier removal. The sample was 59% female with a mean age of 23 ± 6 years and mean BMI of 26.7 ± 6.3 kg/m².
Intervention:
Participants assigned to the intervention group consumed 2 g·day-¹ of magnesium L-threonate (Magtein®; AIDP Inc., City of Industry, CA, USA) divided into two daily doses (morning and evening) for six weeks. Participants assigned to the placebo group consumed visually identical capsules containing rice powder (2 g·day-¹) on the same dosing schedule. Supplement compliance was assessed via capsule count at study conclusion; participants demonstrating less than 85% adherence were excluded from the final analytic sample.
Testing Procedures:
Participants completed identical testing sessions at baseline (Week 0) and following six weeks of supplementation (Week 6). All sessions were conducted at the same time of day for each participant to minimize circadian variability. Prior to each session, participants were instructed to abstain from caffeine for at least 12 hours, alcohol for 24 hours, and strenuous exercise for 24 hours.
Testing was conducted in a standardized order as follows:
Psychophysiological Questionnaires: Participants completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI; 0-21 scale), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI; state and trait subscales), and Visual Analog Scale for Fatigue (VAS-F; 0-100 mm) prior to any physical or cognitive testing.
Neuromuscular Assessment - Pre-fatigue: Countermovement jump (CMJ) performance was assessed using dual force plates (VALD ForceDecks, VALD Performance, Brisbane, Australia). Variables of interest included jump height (cm), peak landing force (N), reactive strength index (m·s-¹), and concentric impulse (N·s).
Cognitive Battery - Pre-fatigue: Cognitive performance was assessed using a computerized battery administered via the SOMA platform (SOMA Technologies, Lucerne, Switzerland). The battery included four tasks: the Psychomotor Fatigue Test (PFTT), Incongruent Flanker Task, Incongruent Stroop Task, and Task-Switching Test. Primary cognitive outcomes included reaction time (RT; ms), processing speed (1000/RT; s-¹), coefficient of variation (%), and rate correct score (correct responses·s-¹) derived from each task.
Mental Fatigue Induction: Mental fatigue was induced via a standardized 20-minute time-load dual-back (TLDB) task. The VAS-F was administered immediately before and after the TLDB task to quantify changes in perceived fatigue. The NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) was completed immediately following the TLDB task to assess subjective cognitive workload across six subscales: mental demand, physical demand, temporal demand, performance, effort, and frustration.
Cognitive Battery - Post-fatigue: The full cognitive battery was repeated immediately following the TLDB protocol to assess performance under conditions of experimentally induced cognitive fatigue.
Neuromuscular Assessment - Post-fatigue: CMJ testing was repeated following the post-fatigue cognitive battery to assess the effect of cognitive load on subsequent neuromuscular output.
Statistical Analysis All analyses were performed in R with statistical significance set at α = 0.05. Primary outcomes were analyzed across three structurally distinct approaches: (1) absolute outcomes and within-bout change scores (pre- to post-mental fatigue) at W0 and W6 were analyzed using linear mixed models with fixed effects of condition, time, the condition-by-time interaction, and a random intercept for participant; (2) six-week change scores (W6 - W0) were analyzed using ANOVA with fixed effects of condition, sex, weight status, and the corresponding two- and three-way interactions; and (3) the change in the within-bout mental fatigue response across the six-week period was analyzed using analogous ANOVA to isolate whether MgT altered the magnitude of the acute mental fatigue response over time. Significant interaction effects were further assessed using post hoc comparisons with Bonferroni-Holm adjustment. Unadjusted simple effects tests were conducted when omnibus interactions were significant but adjusted post hoc comparisons were not, and are reported as exploratory. All primary models were re-estimated following removal of values exceeding ±3 SD to evaluate robustness of findings.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Magnesium L-threonate
Other names: Magtein®
Rice powder
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 6)
Subjective sleep quality assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI; scored 0-21). Higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality. A score ≥5 indicates poor sleep quality.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 6), assessed before and after a 20-minute mental fatigue induction protocol at each visit
Reaction time (ms) on the Incongruent Flanker Task assessed via computerized cognitive battery (SOMA platform). Lower values indicate faster processing.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 6), assessed before and after a 20-minute mental fatigue induction protocol at each visit
Jump height (cm) assessed via dual force plates (VALD ForceDecks). Higher values indicate greater neuromuscular performance.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 6), assessed before and after mental fatigue induction
Processing speed (1000/RT; s-¹) on the Incongruent Flanker Task. Higher values indicate faster processing.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 6), assessed before and after mental fatigue induction
Rate correct score (correct responses·s-¹) on the Incongruent Flanker Task. Higher values indicate better integrated speed-accuracy performance.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 6), assessed before and after mental fatigue induction
Intraindividual response variability (%) on the Incongruent Flanker Task. Lower values indicate more consistent performance.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 6), assessed before and after mental fatigue induction
Reaction time (ms) on the Incongruent Stroop Task assessed via computerized cognitive battery. Lower values indicate faster processing.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 6), assessed before and after mental fatigue induction
Processing speed (1000/RT; s-¹) on the Incongruent Stroop Task. Higher values indicate faster processing.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 6), assessed before and after mental fatigue induction
Rate correct score (correct responses·s-¹) on the Incongruent Stroop Task. Higher values indicate better integrated speed-accuracy performance.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 6), assessed before and after mental fatigue induction
Reaction time (ms) on the Psychomotor Fatigue Test (PFTT). Lower values indicate faster psychomotor processing.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 6), assessed before and after mental fatigue induction
Processing speed (1000/RT; s-¹) on the PFTT. Higher values indicate faster psychomotor processing.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 6), assessed before and after mental fatigue induction
Rate correct score (correct responses·s-¹) on the PFTT. Higher values indicate better integrated speed-accuracy performance.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 6), assessed before and after mental fatigue induction
Reaction time (ms) on the Task-Switching Test (TSWT). Lower values indicate faster cognitive flexibility.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 6), assessed before and after mental fatigue induction
Processing speed (1000/RT; s-¹) on the TSWT. Higher values indicate faster cognitive flexibility.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 6), assessed before and after mental fatigue induction
Rate correct score (correct responses·s-¹) on the TSWT. Higher values indicate better integrated speed-accuracy performance.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 6)
Rate correct score (correct responses·s-¹) on the 20-minute time-load dual-back (TLDB) mental fatigue induction task.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 6), assessed before and after mental fatigue induction
Peak landing force (N) assessed via dual force plates (VALD ForceDecks).
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 6), assessed before and after mental fatigue induction
Reactive strength index (m·s-¹) assessed via dual force plates (VALD ForceDecks). Higher values indicate greater neuromuscular efficiency.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 6), assessed before and after mental fatigue induction
Concentric impulse (N·s) assessed via dual force plates (VALD ForceDecks). Higher values indicate greater force application during the propulsive phase.
Time frame: Change from baseline (Week 0) to post-intervention (Week 6)
Six-week change in PSQI global score stratified by sex and weight status.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 6)
Perceived psychological stress assessed using the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (scored 0-40). Higher scores indicate greater perceived stress.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 6)
State anxiety assessed using the STAI state subscale (scored 20-80). Higher scores indicate greater anxiety.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 6)
Trait anxiety assessed using the STAI trait subscale (scored 20-80). Higher scores indicate greater dispositional anxiety.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 6), assessed before and after mental fatigue induction at each visit
Subjective fatigue assessed using a 100 mm visual analog scale. Higher scores indicate greater perceived fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 6), assessed immediately following mental fatigue induction
Multidimensional subjective workload assessed across six subscales: mental demand, physical demand, temporal demand, performance, effort, and frustration (each scored 0-20; total scored 0-120). Higher scores indicate greater perceived workload.
Barry University
Other
Sex-Divergent Effects of Magnesium L-Threonate Supplementation on Sleep Quality, Cognitive Performance Under Mental Fatigue, and Neuromuscular Function in Healthy Adults: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07396779
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Istanbul, Beykoz, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07522840
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Ağrı, Ağri, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07721506
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
View Trial DetailsNCT07319117
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
View Trial Details