Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00403364

Sequential Therapy Versus Triple Therapy for Helicobacter Pylori Eradication: a Placebo-controlled Trial

To assess if a sequential treatment regimen better eradicates H. pylori than does a triple drug regimen in adults with dyspepsia or peptic ulcer disease.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2 / Phase 3

Primary location

S.Orsola/Malpighi Teaching Hospital, University

Bologna, 40138, Italy

About this study

Background: Antimicrobial resistance has decreased eradication rates for H. pylori worldwide.

Objective: To assess if a sequential treatment regimen better eradicates H. pylori than does a triple drug regimen in adults with dyspepsia or peptic ulcer disease.

Design: Placebo-controlled trial. Setting: Two Italian Hospitals between September 2003 and April 2006. Patients: 300 dyspeptic or peptic ulcer patients Measurements: 13C urea breath test, upper endoscopy, histology, rapid urease test, bacterial culture, and antibiotic resistance assessment.

Intervention: 10-day sequential regimen (pantoprazole 40 mg, amoxicillin 1 g plus placebo for the first 5 days, followed by pantoprazole 40 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and tinidazole 500 mg for the remaining 5 days) in 150 patients or standard 10-day therapy (pantoprazole 40 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and amoxicillin 1 g) in 150 patients. All drugs were given twice daily.

Results: There were 295 patients (Intent to treat) of whom 91% (95% CI: 86.5-95.7) had successful eradication with sequential therapy compared to 78% (95% CI: 71.2-84.5) for standard therapy (difference: 13.3%; 95%). The sequential therapy was significantly more effective in patients with clarithromycin resistant strains (88.9% patients vs. 28.6%; P = 0.0034). The incidence of major and minor side effects did not differ between therapy groups (17% vs. 17%).

Limitations: Follow-up was incomplete in 4.6% and 2.7% patients in sequential and standard therapy, respectively. The higher efficacy of sequential regimen should be confirmed outside Italy.

Conclusions: Sequential therapy is superior to conventional therapy for the eradication of H. pylori and it is significantly more effective in patients harbouring clarithromycin resistant strains.

The incidence side effects did not differ between therapy groups.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Helicobacter pylori infected patients > 18 years

Exclusion criteria

  • previous H. pylori eradication treatment;
  • Use of proton pump inhibitors, H2-receptor antagonists, bismuth preparations and antibiotics in the previous 4 weeks;
  • Concomitant anticoagulant or ketoconazole use, due to the potential of interaction with the study medications;
  • Zollinger-Ellison syndrome;
  • Previous surgery of the esophagus and/or upper gastrointestinal tract (with the exception of appendectomy, polypectomy and cholecystectomy);
  • Severe or unstable cardiovascular, pulmonary, or endocrine disease; clinically significant renal or hepatic disease or dysfunction; hematological disorder; any other clinically significant medical condition that could increase the risk to the study participants; malignant disease of any kind during the previous 5 years except for successfully treated skin (basal or squamous cell) cancer or Barrett esophagus with high grade dysplasia;
  • Drug or medication abuse within the past year;
  • Severe psychiatric or neurological disorders;
  • Pregnant or nursing women sexually active women of child bearing potential who were not willing to practice medically acceptable contraception (oral contraceptives; inject able/implantable or mechanical devices as well as vasectomy of the sexual partner) for the entire duration of the study.

Treatment and study plan

Placebo amoxicillin pantoprazole clarithromycin tinidazole

Drug

Primary outcomes

  1. 13C urea breath test, upper endoscopy, histology, rapid urease test assessment

Secondary outcomes

  1. bacterial culture, and antibiotic resistance assessment

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2003
Study completion
2006
First posted
Nov 23, 2006
Registry last updated
Mar 18, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.