Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01588457

Sequential Multiple Assignment Treatment for Bipolar Disorder

The purpose of this study is to compare which of the two mood stabilizers (drugs that help to steady/stabilize mood in patients with bipolar disorder (BD)), lithium and divalproex, is more effective in patients with bipolar disorder over 26 weeks. The study will also compare if lithium or divalproex used alone versus lithium or divalproex used with quetiapine versus lithium or divalproex used with lamotrigine is more effective when symptoms of depression develop.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This open methods advancement study will randomize BD patients with clinically significant symptoms to treatment with one of two mood stabilizers (MS), lithium [Li] or divalproex [Div]. Those who develop protocol defined depression will then be randomized to a MS alone, MS + quetiapine [QTP] or MS + lamotrigine [LTG]. A SMART strategy employs a rule for adding new treatments based on each patient's current illness state and response during the trial, mimicking the adaptive nature of treatment selection which occurs in clinical settings, but in a controlled way which allows application of causal inference. By using early indices of response to dynamically alter treatment decisions to improve outcome, SMART eliminates unmeasured confounders associated with treatment decisions that are not randomized, as occurs in data mining exercises and in other non-randomized decisions in studies which randomize one variable at baseline. This sequential adaptive design represents a methodological innovation in bipolar trial history which will have particular implications for effectiveness studies.

Specific Aim A.1: Assess the feasibility of a SMART design in the conduct of an effectiveness study over 26 weeks in patients with BD (bipolar disorder).

Aim A.2 Compare the effectiveness of Li to Div as a primary component of treatment for BD over 26 weeks.

Aim A.3: Assess the effectiveness of MS + QTP and MS + LTG versus MS in subjects who develop depression.

A4. Exploratory Aims: 1.Determine the effects of ethnicity, language facility, education and stress as moderators of treatment outcomes; 2. Explore the use of novel statistical methodologies to more informatively characterize illness trajectories in response to the interventions. In the aggregate these aims also will clarify whether the SMART confirms results provided by traditional, single point randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • DSM-IV TR (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Edition IV Text Revision) diagnosis BD I or II as assessed by MINI PLUS (Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview PLUS)
  • Male or female ≥ 18 years old
  • Currently symptomatic with a CGI-BP-S ≥3 for mania/hypomania &/or depression for ≥ 2 weeks
  • One of the following indicators of recent active illness: a depressive or manic or hypomanic or mixed episode in the past 12 months
  • If female of child bearing age must use effective birth control.

Exclusion criteria

  • Unwilling or unable to comply with study requirements
  • Renal impairment (serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL)
  • If maintained on thyroid medication must be euthyroid for at least 1 month before Visit 1
  • Patients who have had intolerable side effects to QTP, Li, Div, or LTG
  • Patients whose clinical status requires inpatient care
  • Drug/alcohol dependence within the past 30 days
  • Pregnancy as determined by serum pregnancy test or breastfeeding
  • History of poor response to Li at a serum Li of ≥ 0.5 mEq/L (milliequivalents per Liter) or Div at a serum level of ≥ 45 mg/dL for at least 2 weeks.

Treatment and study plan

Lithium

Drug

Therapeutic dosage as indicated by participants condition with blood levels. LI will be dosed to attain Li of ≥0.5mEq/L (milliequivalents per liter).

Other names: Lithium Carbonate

divalproex

Drug

DV will be dosed to attain DV levels of ≥45mg/L.

Other names: Depakote, Depakote ER

Lamotrigine

Drug

LM will be incrementally dosed up to 400 mg/day, or, in combination with DV, 200 mg/day. Dosage may be reduced for adverse effects to one half of the target dose.

Other names: Lamictal

Quetiapine

Drug

QT will be started at 50 mg/day and titrated up to 300 mg as tolerated. QT will be discontinued if not tolerated at 100mg/day and the patient will be treated according to guidelines.

Other names: Seroquel

Primary outcomes

  1. Bipolar Inventory of Symptoms Scale (BISS)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to 26 weeks

    The BISS uses a structured interview to assess the full spectrum of symptoms associated with all primary clinical states in bipolar disorder, yielding a total severity, a depression, a mania, as well as dimensional scale scores. There are 42 items; each item is rated on a 0-4 scale. The BISS is a clinician-rated instrument. The Scale is rated as follows:

    0 Not at all

    • Slight
    • Mild
    • Moderate
    • Severe Each of the 42 items is rated separately, with a score, based on the most recent 7 day period. The mean score is calculated from the total score, giving an overall score out of 4, where 0 is slight and 4 is the most severe symptoms. A negative score indicated an improvement from baseline to 26 weeks.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Global Assessment of Functioning

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to 26 weeks

    The Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-S) is used to assess global illness severity

    The CGI-S score change is measured from baseline to 26 weeks and is rated on a 7-point scale. The scale is read as follows:

    • very much improved since the initiation of treatment
    • much improved
    • minimally improved
    • no change from baseline (the initiation of treatment)
    • minimally worse
    • much worse
    • very much worse since the initiation of treatment The score is calculated as a mean of all items, where 1 indicates improvement from inititation of visit, and 7 indicates the condition to be much worse since the inititation of treatment. A negative score indicates a change from worse to better.
  2. Baseline Randomization Percentage of Bipolar Types

    Time frame: Baseline

    Percentages of Type I and Type II Bipolar Disorder included in Randomization groups

  3. Demographic in Randomization 1 Group

    Time frame: Baseline

    Baseline demographic percentages of subject randomized to either Divalproex or Lithium at the first randomization

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Registry information

Official study title

Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Treatment (SMART) for Bipolar Disorder

Acronym: SMART

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
May 1, 2012
Registry last updated
Aug 19, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.