Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT06894485
This randomized controlled trial examines the effectiveness of sensory training in patients undergoing rehabilitation for distal radius fractures. Forty-four participants (aged 18-65, with no prior upper extremity injuries) will be randomly assigned to a control group (conventional physiotherapy) or an experimental group (conventional physiotherapy plus sensory training, including desensitization and proprioception exercises). Assessments will be conducted at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks using grip strength, sensory function, fine motor skills, pain level, and functional capacity measures. The study aims to compare the impact of sensory training versus conventional physiotherapy on pain reduction, sensory recovery, grip strength, and functional hand use.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of sensory training in patients with distal radius fractures. Designed as a randomized controlled trial, the study will include 44 participants aged 18-65 years who have not had a prior upper extremity injury and are in the rehabilitation phase after a fracture. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the control group (receiving conventional physiotherapy) or the experimental group (receiving conventional physiotherapy plus sensory training, including desensitization and proprioception exercises).
Assessments will be conducted before treatment, at 4 weeks, and at 8 weeks. The evaluation tools will include grip strength (hand dynamometer & pinch meter), sensory function (monofilament test), fine motor skills (Nine-Hole Peg Test - NHPT), pain level (Numerical Pain Rating Scale - NPRS), and functional capacity (DASH questionnaire).
The aim of this study is to compare the effects of sensory training versus conventional physiotherapy on pain reduction, sensory recovery, grip strength, and functional hand use.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: on the first day, four and eight week change
The monofilament test is a clinical assessment method used to evaluate sensory function and detect peripheral nerve damage. It is widely used in physiotherapy and neurology to measure tactile sensitivity and identify sensory impairments.
Time frame: on the first day, four and eight week change
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is a measurement method based on the patient's numerical expression of pain. It is commonly used to determine the intensity of pain and track changes during the treatment process.
Test Procedure Explaining the Scale to the Patient: A scale ranging from 0 to 10 is shown to the patient. 0 = No pain, 10 = The most intense pain imaginable. The patient is asked to choose the number that best represents their current pain.
Time frame: on the first day, four and eight week change
Hand Dynamometer: The hand dynamometer is a device used to measure hand grip strength and is commonly used in the evaluation of hand functions.
Pinch Meter: Pincer Meter is a device used to measure the strength of a pinching or gripping action, typically between the thumb and index finger.
Time frame: on the first day, four and eight week change
Nine-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT) is a test used to assess hand function, fine motor skills, and hand coordination. It is commonly used in neurological conditions, hand injuries, and rehabilitation processes.
Procedure:
Time frame: on the first day, four and eight week change
The DASH Scale (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) is a widely used and valid questionnaire for assessing upper extremity function.
The DASH scale consists of 30 questions. These questions cover the difficulties patients experience with arm, shoulder, and hand functions, the level of pain they experience, and any difficulties they encounter in daily activities. Additionally, a 5-point Likert scale is used to assess the severity of the complaints (1 = no difficulty, 5 = very difficult).
Each response is scored, and a total result is obtained. The scores are then evaluated on a scale of 0-100. Lower scores indicate less disability, while higher scores indicate greater functional impairment.
Evaluation: The results are used to assess the patient's overall functional status and their response to treatment. Higher scores indicate significant difficulties with upper extremity function.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Istanbul University
Other
Effectiveness of Sensory Training in Distal Radius Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07108543
Arm Injuries, Distal Radius Fractures
View Trial DetailsNCT06866340
Arm Injuries, Body Perception
Milan, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT06698367
Arm Injuries, Behavior
Temuco, Chile
View Trial DetailsNCT07697976
Arm Injuries, Behavior
Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria
View Trial Details