Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02854631

Selonsertib in Combination With Prednisolone Versus Prednisolone Alone in Participants With Severe Alcoholic Hepatitis (AH)

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of selonsertib (GS-4997) in combination with prednisolone versus prednisolone alone in participants with severe alcoholic hepatitis (AH).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Medizinische Universitat Graz, Graz, Austria

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Willing and able to give informed consent prior to any study specific procedures being performed. In individuals with hepatic encephalopathy (HE) which may impair decision-making, consent will be obtained per hospital procedures (eg, by Legally Authorized Representative)
  • Clinical diagnosis of severe AH
  • Maddrey's Discriminant Function (DF) ≥ 32 at screening

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating females;
  • Other causes of liver disease including chronic hepatitis B (hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] positive), chronic hepatitis C (HCV RNA positive), acetaminophen hepatotoxicity, biliary obstruction, and autoimmune liver disease;
  • Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) >400 U/L or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >300 U/L;
  • Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) >30 at screening;
  • Maddrey's DF >60 at screening;
  • Grade 4 Hepatic Encephalopathy (HE) by West Haven criteria;
  • Concomitant or previous history of hepatocellular carcinoma;
  • History of liver transplantation;
  • HIV Ab positive;
  • Clinical suspicion of pneumonia;
  • Uncontrolled sepsis;
  • Uncontrolled gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding or controlled GI bleeding within 7 days of screening that was associated with shock or required transfusion of more than 3 units of blood;
  • Type 1 hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) or renal failure defined as a serum creatinine >221 μmol/L (>2.5 mg/dL) or the requirement for renal replacement therapy;
  • Individuals dependent on inotropic (eg, epinephrine or norepinephrine) or ventilatory support (ie, endotracheal intubation or positive-pressure ventilation);
  • Portal vein thrombosis;
  • Acute pancreatitis;
  • Cessation of alcohol consumption for more than 2 months before Baseline/ Day 1

Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/ Exclusion criteria may apply.

Treatment and study plan

Selonsertib

Drug

18 mg tablet administered orally once daily

Other names: GS-4997

Prednisolone

Drug

40 mg (4 x 10 mg tablets) administered orally once daily

Placebo

Drug

Selonsertib placebo tablet administered orally once daily

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent (TE) Adverse Events (AE), Serious AEs (SAE), AEs Leading to Premature Study Drug Discontinuation, and Grade 3 or 4 Laboratory Abnormalities

    Time frame: Up to Day 28 plus 30 days

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that occurred during the course of the trial after study treatment had started. An adverse event was therefore any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, are life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or results in disability/incapacity, and congenital anomaly/birth defect. Laboratory toxicity grading was based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Died by Day 28

    Time frame: Day 28

    The percentage of participants who died by Day 28 was calculated.

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Died by Week 8

    Time frame: Week 8

    The percentage of participants who died by Week 8 was calculated.

  3. Percentage of Participants Who Died by Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

    The percentage of participants who died by Week 12 was calculated.

  4. Percentage of Participants Who Died by Week 24

    Time frame: Week 24

    The percentage of participants who died by Week 24 was calculated.

  5. Percentage of Participants With Survival at Day 28 Using Kaplan-Meier

    Time frame: Day 28

    The percentage of participants with survival at Day 28 using Kaplan-Meier was calculated.

  6. Percentage of Participants With Survival at Week 8 Using Kaplan-Meier

    Time frame: Week 8

    The percentage of participants with survival at Week 8 using Kaplan-Meier was calculated.

  7. Percentage of Participants With Survival at Week 12 Using Kaplan-Meier

    Time frame: Week 12

    The percentage of participants with survival at Week 12 using Kaplan-Meier was calculated.

  8. Percentage of Participants With Survival at Week 24 Using Kaplan-Meier

    Time frame: Week 24

    The percentage of participants with survival at Week 24 using Kaplan-Meier was calculated.

  9. Percentage of Participants Who Received a Liver Transplant

    Time frame: Day 28, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 24

    The percentage of participants who received a liver transplant by week 24 was calculated.

  10. Percentage of Participants With Hepatorenal Syndrome (HRS)

    Time frame: Up to 24 weeks

    The occurrence of HRS was confirmed based on the following diagnostic criteria from the International Ascites Club (IAC): 1) Cirrhosis with ascites, 2) Diagnosis of acute kidney injury (AKI) according to the ICA-AKI criteria, 3) Absence of shock, 4) No current or recent treatment with nephrotoxic drugs, and 5) Absence of parenchymal renal disease as indicated by proteinuria >500 mg/day, microhematuria (> 50 red blood cells per high power field) and/or abnormal renal ultrasonography.

  11. Percentage of Participants With Infection

    Time frame: Up to 24 weeks

    The occurrence of bacterial, fungal, or viral infections was recorded. An infection was considered definite in participants with clinical evidence of infection and a positive culture from a normally sterile source (with the exception of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis).

  12. Length of Hospital Stay

    Time frame: Up to 24 weeks

    Length of initial hospital stay from first dose date of study drug was calculated for participants who were released from initial hospitalization separately from those who died during their initial hospitalization.

  13. Change From Baseline in Liver Biochemistry Tests: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 24 weeks

    Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at endpoint minus the value at Baseline.

  14. Change From Baseline in Liver Biochemistry Tests: Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 24 weeks

    Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at endpoint minus the value at Baseline.

  15. Change From Baseline in Liver Biochemistry Tests: Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT)

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 24 weeks

    Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at endpoint minus the value at Baseline.

  16. Change From Baseline in Liver Biochemistry Tests: Alkaline Phosphatase

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 24 weeks

    Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at endpoint minus the value at Baseline.

  17. Change From Baseline in Liver Biochemistry Tests: Bilirubin

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 24 weeks

    Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at endpoint minus the value at Baseline.

  18. Change From Baseline in Liver Biochemistry Tests: Albumin

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 24 weeks

    Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at endpoint minus the value at Baseline.

  19. Change From Baseline in Liver Biochemistry Tests: International Normalized Ratio (INR)

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 24 weeks

    Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at endpoint minus the value at Baseline.

  20. Percentage of Participants With Lille Response (Score < 0.45) at Day 7

    Time frame: Day 7

    The Lille score is a tool used to predict which participants with severe alcoholic hepatitis (AH) were not responding to corticosteroid therapy. It ranges between 0 and 1, with low scores (< 0.16) indicating complete response or positive response to steroids (continue therapy) and high scores (≥ 0.56) indicating no response or poor response to steroids (stop therapy). The Lille score was calculated using baseline factors: age, albumin, total bilirubin, serum creatinine, prothrombin time; and the change in total bilirubin between baseline (Day 1) and Day 7. Lille response was defined as having a Lille score < 0.45.

  21. Percentage of Participants With a Lille Null Response (Score ≥ 0.56) at Day 7

    Time frame: Day 7

    The Lille score is a tool used to predict which participants with severe AH were not responding to corticosteroid therapy. It ranges between 0 and 1, with low scores (< 0.16) indicating complete response or positive response to steroids (continue therapy) and high scores (≥ 0.56) indicating no response or poor response to steroids (stop therapy). The Lille score was calculated using baseline factors: age, albumin, total bilirubin, serum creatinine, prothrombin time; and the change in total bilirubin between baseline (Day 1) and Day 7. Lille null response was defined as having a Lille score ≥ 0.56.

  22. Lille Score at Day 7 as a Continuous Variable

    Time frame: Day 7

    The Lille score is a tool used to predict which participants with severe AH were not responding to corticosteroid therapy. It ranges between 0 and 1, with low scores (< 0.16) indicating complete response or positive response to steroids (continue therapy) and high scores (≥ 0.56) indicating no response or poor response to steroids (stop therapy). The Lille score was calculated using baseline factors: age, albumin, total bilirubin, serum creatinine, prothrombin time; and the change in total bilirubin between baseline (Day 1) and Day 7.

  23. Percentage of Participants With Estimated Mortality at Month 2 and Month 6: Combined Scoring Including Lille Score at Day 7 and Baseline Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) Score

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 7 Time Points used to calculate Overall Mortality Risk at Months 2 and 6

    The Lille score is a tool used to predict which participants with severe AH were not responding to corticosteroid therapy. It ranges between 0 and 1, with low scores (< 0.16) indicating complete response or positive response to steroids (continue therapy) and high scores (≥ 0.56) indicating no response or poor response to steroids (stop therapy). MELD scores are used to assess prognosis and suitability for liver transplantation. Scores can range from 6 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity. A scoring system combining the Lille score at Day 7 and the baseline MELD score was used to calculate the percentage of participants expected to die by Month 2 and by Month 6.

  24. Change From Baseline in Prognostic Index: Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) Score

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 24 weeks

    MELD scores are used to assess prognosis and suitability for liver transplantation. Scores can range from 6 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at endpoint minus the value at Baseline.

  25. Change From Baseline in Prognostic Index: Child-Pugh-Turcotte (CPT) Score

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 24 weeks

    CPT scores are used to assess the severity of cirrhosis. Scores can range from 5 to 15, with higher scores indicating a greater severity of disease

  26. Change From Baseline in Prognostic Index: Maddrey Discriminant Function (DF) Score

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 24 weeks

    Baseline Maddrey DF score is a prognostic tool used to determine the next step of treatment based on the severity of AH. Maddrey DF score of < 32 indicates mild to moderate AH and a lower chance of death in the next few months. Maddrey DF score of ≥ 32 indicates severe AH and a higher chance of death in the next few months. The score has no bounds.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Gilead Sciences

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase 2, Double-Blind, Randomized Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of GS-4997 in Combination With Prednisolone Versus Prednisolone Alone in Subjects With Severe Alcoholic Hepatitis (AH)

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Aug 3, 2016
Registry last updated
Feb 6, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.