Lidocaine
DrugA buccal infiltration injection followed by palatal injections and interpapillary injections of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine will be administered.
Other names: Control Grup
NCT Number: NCT05443009
The aim of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of articaine in controlling self-reported pain compared with conventional lidocaine anesthesia in children requiring extraction of deciduous maxillary molars. Only one extraction will be performed on each child. At least two consultations will be necessary to carry out the present controlled, randomized, and blinded study. All participants will be treated by the same dentist. Self-reported pain will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me6 year–9 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Centro de Especialidades Odontológicas (CEO), Florianópolis, Brazil
In the present study, self-reported pain during extraction of a maxillary primary molar with one buccal infiltration anesthesia with articaine will be compared with the conventional technique (buccal infiltration and palatal supplementation) with lidocaine. The study design will be a blind, controlled, randomized, non-inferiority clinical trial with two parallel groups. The anesthetic will be administered according to the weight of the child, using a table with the amount of anesthetic per weight group and the maximum recommended dose as reference. The hypothesis is that articaine, due to its anesthetic properties, is able to anesthetize as well as lidocaine with only one oral infiltration, without the need for additional anesthesia, which may guarantee better participant comfort, less dental anxiety, and less chair time. The use of the Visual Analogue Scale is important to assess the pain perceived by the children and to ensure the reliability of the responses. Participant comfort will be evaluated at each stage of the proposed treatment, and withdrawal from participation will be guaranteed at any time.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A buccal infiltration injection followed by palatal injections and interpapillary injections of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine will be administered.
Other names: Control Grup
A single buccal infiltration injection of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine will be administered.
Other names: Test Grup
Time frame: Immediately after the maxillary primary molar extraction
Self-assessment of pain using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 0-100mm, higher values represent a worse outcome)
Time frame: During the injection of local anesthesia and the surgical procedure
Pain is evaluated by the outcome assessor using the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Behavioral Pain Rating Scale (FLACC 0-10 score, higher values represent a worse outcome) and the Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FBRS 0-10 score, higher values represent a worse outcome)
Time frame: Immediately after the injection of local anesthesia and the maxillary primary molar extraction
Self-assessment of pain using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (FACES 0-10 score, higher values represent a worse outcome)
Time frame: Immediately after the injection of local anesthesia
Self-assessment of pain using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 0-100mm, higher values represent a worse outcome)
Time frame: Immediately before, durin, and immediately after the surgical procedure
Heart rate variability to be verified and recorded with the heart rate sensor (Polar H-10)
Time frame: Immediately before, durin, and immediately after the surgical procedure
Heart rate to be verified and recorded at moments described above carried out with the heart rate sensor (Polar H-10) and pulse oximeter
Time frame: 24 hours after the surgical procedure
Self-assessment of pain using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 0-100 mm, higher values represent a worse outcome) and the Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FBRS 0-10 score, higher values represent a worse outcome) in the postoperative period. It will be applied through teleconsultation
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
Other
Evaluation of Self-Reported Pain in Children Submitted to Single Infiltration of Articaine During Primary Molar Extraction: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02320708
Dental Pain, Facial Pain
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04231955
Dental Pain, Facial Pain
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT02966067
Anesthesia, Local, Dental Pain
Dublin, Ireland
View Trial DetailsNCT07698847
Dental Pain, Facial Pain
Adana, Sarıçam, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details