Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03141528

Self-learning vs Instructor-led Learning in BLS

This study investigates whether there is a difference in the BLS skills in first year medical students directly after training and three months later, when randomly assigned to self-learning versus instructor-led training courses.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University Hospital Inselspital

Bern, 3010, Switzerland

About this study

This is a randomized controlled trial investigating whether self-learning versus instructor-led learning results in the same BLS skills in first year medical students directly after training and three months later.

When participants attend the "Erweiterte Erste Hilfe für Studierende der Humanmedizin" they will receive a short introduction about the study. The investigators will invite all first year students to participate in the study. As the study is voluntarily, participants need to sign a written informed consent. After that, the investigators will randomize the students to either group A or Group B. Group A will train their technical CPR-skills with supervision by a tutor (either general practitioner or medical student, all trained in CPR teaching) and group B will train without supervision. The participants in group B will not be allowed to communicate with each other during the training and they will be prevented from watching each other. The training will take about 30 minutes for each group. Directly after the training each group will be tested and the printed report form from the Laerdal Skill Reporter will be obtained for each participant. In the test the students will perform CPR in a simulated scenario as a first responder. The scenario is: "A male person has collapsed at the railway station." The participant should start CPR as learned in the training. During the CPR a departmental research fellow will observe the study participants and record BLS/AED actions on a scoring sheet.

The investigators will record three cycles of two minutes CPR (with five times 30:2 compression : ventilation intervals, as recommended by the current international resuscitation guidelines). During the three cycles an AED will be delivered and the study participant has to apply the AED and deliver a shock - after three cycles the study terminates.

After the BLS/AED competence testing, both groups will continue the rest of their first aid course together and the first part of the study ends. Three months later, the investigators will repeat the same scenario over the same time interval and record the same parameters. At the end of the second testing, a short feedback will be provided on the BLS/AED competence and further practice will be provided to the students to improve their CPR competence. From this point forward no further data will be collected.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • First year medical students at the University of Bern participating in the course "Erweiterte Erste Hilfe für Studierende der Humanmedizin" with written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Students with professional BLS-experience, unable to perform BLS, or missing informed consent will be excluded.

Treatment and study plan

Self-learning

Other

Training without supervision

Instructor-led learning

Other

Supervision by a tutor (either general practitioner or medical student, all trained in CPR teaching)

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Correct Compressions

    Time frame: after first BLS course and 3 months later

    The percentage of correct compressions obtained from the printed report from the Laerdal Skill Reporter.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assessment of the Participants BLS Competences After Test

    Time frame: after first BLS course and 3 months later

    Assessment of the participant's BLS competence by the study team after test.

    Rated on a Visual Analogue Scale from 0-100mm, where 0mm = completely incompetent, no idea what to do, and 100mm = totally competent, cannot be done better.

  2. Self-assessment of the Participants BLS Competences Before Test

    Time frame: before first BLS course and 3 months later

    The participants assessment of their own BLS competences. Rated on a Visual Analogue Scale from 0-100mm, where 0mm = completely incompetent, no idea what to do, and 100mm = totally competent, cannot be done better.

  3. Assessment of the Teaching Method

    Time frame: after first BLS course

    The participants assessment of the teaching method. Rated on a Visual Analogue Scale from 0-100mm, where 0mm = completely inefficient, and 100mm = totally efficient, nothing can be done better."

  4. Average Ventilation Volume

    Time frame: after first BLS course and 3 months later

    Ventilation volume from the printed report from the Laerdal Skill Reporter (LSR)

  5. Number of Ventilations Per Minute

    Time frame: after first BLS course and 3 months later

    Number of ventilations per minute from the printed report from the Laerdal Skill Reporter (LSR)

  6. Percentage of Correct Ventilations

    Time frame: after first BLS course and 3 months later

    Percentage of correct ventilations from the printed report from the Laerdal Skill Reporter (LSR)

  7. Number of Participants Using Correct Ratio of Compressions:Ventilations

    Time frame: after first BLS course and 3 months later

    the relationship between ventilations and compressions from the printed report from the Laerdal Skill Reporter (LSR). Ventilations - relationship 30 compressions and 2 ventilations.

  8. Compression Depth

    Time frame: after first BLS course and 3 months later

    Compression depth from the printed report from the Laerdal Skill Reporter (LSR)

  9. Number of Compressions Per Minute

    Time frame: after first BLS course and 3 months later

    Number of compressions per minute from the Laerdal Skill Reporter (LSR)

  10. Compression Frequency

    Time frame: after first BLS course and 3 months later

    Compression frequency from the Laerdal Skill Reporter (LSR). Compressions per minute ventilation break included.

  11. Compressions Too Shallow

    Time frame: after first BLS course and 3 months later

    Total percentage of Compressions too shallow from the Laerdal Skill Reporter (LSR)

  12. False Hand Placement During Compressions

    Time frame: after first BLS course and 3 months later

    False hand placement during compressions.

  13. Incomplete Decompression

    Time frame: after first BLS course and 3 months later

    Incomplete decompression from the Laerdal Skill Reporter (LSR)

  14. Time From Start of Test Till Call for Help

    Time frame: after first BLS course and 3 months later

    Time measured from the beginning of the test until the participant calls for help.

  15. Time From Start of Test Till First Compression

    Time frame: after first BLS course and 3 months later

    Time measured from the beginning of the test until the participant makes the first compression.

  16. Time From Start of Test Till First Ventilation

    Time frame: after first BLS course and 3 months later

    Time measured from the beginning of the test until the participant makes the first ventilation.

  17. Time From Start of Test Till First Shock

    Time frame: after first BLS course and 3 months later

    Time measured from the beginning of the test until the participant gives the first shock.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

Other

Collaborators

  • University of Bern

Registry information

Official study title

Self-learning Versus Instructor-led Learning in Basic Life Support Training - A Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
May 5, 2017
Registry last updated
Jan 13, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.