Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06777576

Self-balancing Personal Exoskeleton for SCI

This study aims to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the personal exoskeleton in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

James J. Peters, VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY

The Bronx, New York, 10468-3904, United States

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Ann M Spungen, EdD

CONTACT

[email protected]

718-584-9000 ext. 5814

Ann M Spungen, EdD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Christopher Cardozo, MD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

David Kim

CONTACT

[email protected]

718-584-9000 ext. 3122

Stephen Kornfeld, DO

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

This personal exoskeleton, developed by Wandercraft as a new version of the Atalante X, offers a novel hands-free and self-balancing design, aiming at enhancing stability and mobility for users in daily activities.

The study features an interventional, prospective, single-group, and open-label design, conducted over 3 to 4 weeks at two US research facilities. 24 subjects are required to complete the study. Anticipating a 15% dropout rate, the study will enroll 29 participants.

Over the course of nine to ten scheduled visits, participants undergo a sequence of procedures, beginning with screening and device fitting. This is followed by five training sessions which conclude with an evaluation to issue a competency certificate to confirm the ability to use the device across all its "basic skills". Additionally, two sessions are dedicated to evaluating the exoskeleton's effectiveness outcomes, complemented by an extra practice session. Each visit lasts an average of 1.5 hours.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

SCI user inclusion Criteria:

  • Any gender, age 18 years or older;
  • Motor complete or incomplete SCI with lesions at or above T6;
  • ≥ 6 months post SCI;
  • Able and willing to attend 9 to 10 visits1 to the center, including sessions of training and assessments of one-to-three hours duration;
  • Able to read, understand, and provide informed consent;
  • Living in the US and speaks English.

SCI user exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of neurological injury other than SCI;
  • Progressive condition that would be expected to result in changing neurological status;
  • Severe concurrent medical disease, illness or condition judged to be contraindicated by the site physician;
  • Unhealed or unstable traumatic or high impact lower extremity fracture of any duration that is, in the clinical judgement of the study physician, exclusionary for standing and walking;
  • Knee (proximal tibia and/or distal femur) BMD <0.60 gm/cm2;
  • Total hip BMD T-scores < -3.5;
  • Fragility, minimal trauma, or low impact fracture of the lower extremity since SCI;
  • Untreatable severe spasticity judged to be contraindicated by the site physician;
  • Untreated/uncontrolled hypertension, as judged to be contraindicated by the site physician;
  • Unresolved orthostatic hypotension (change from baseline seated BP to a fall in 20mmHg SBP and/or fall in 10mmHG DBP and symptoms when standing), or as judged to be contraindicated by the site physician;
  • Open or unhealed skin pressure sores, abrasions, or bruises at any of the contact points of the exoskeleton;
  • Morphological contraindications to the use of the device;
  • Uncorrectable leg length discrepancy over 2 cm (about 0.79 in) when using additional correction tools;
  • Unable to effectively operate the device with a hand-control interface, due to functional and/or cognitive impairment, evaluated based on the ability to manipulate the joystick in all direction, press and identify buttons on the hand control interface.
  • Improper fitting in the device;
  • Psychopathology documentation in the medical record that may conflict with study objectives;
  • Pregnancy or women who plan to become pregnant during the study period;
  • Concurrent participation in another interventional trial;
  • History of uncontrolled autonomic dysreflexia;
  • Presence colostomy and/or urostomy;
  • Ventilator use at the time of the exoskeleton use.

Companion inclusion Criteria:

  • Any gender, age 18 years or older;
  • Willingness to attend 9 to 10 visits to the center, including sessions of training and assessments of one-to-three hours duration with the SCI user;
  • Able to read, understand and provide informed consent;
  • Living in the US and speaks English.

Companion exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to communicate with an assistant due to cognitive and language disorders;
  • Any disease, concomitant injury, or condition that interferes with the performance or interpretation of the protocol- specified assessments;
  • Insufficient strength and performance capability, evidenced by the ability to hold and retain the device in case of unbalance/fall;
  • Insufficient availability to complete the study;
  • Concurrent participation in another interventional trial.

Treatment and study plan

Hands-free exoskeleton

Device

A "device trainer specialist" from the investigation site will deliver training sessions with the exoskeleton to pair of participants (a pair corresponds to an individual with SCI and his/her companion). The device trainer will follow the progression of the pair through the training program and ensure they learn all the device "basic skills". Each training session lasts an average of 1.5 hours, variations according to the user's learning pace and tolerance. During the sessions with the exoskeleton, the participants will engage in mobility activities on different surfaces and perform Activities of Daily Living in simulated environments such as kitchen, bathroom, elevators and outdoor spaces.

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of subjects who complete the Timed Up and Go (TUG) in 3min or less.

    Time frame: At visit 7, after an average of 7.5 hours of training and at visit 9, after an average of 9 hours of training.

    The TUG evaluates the time from starting in a seated position to stand-up, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back 3 meters and sit down on indoor surface.

  2. Proportion of subjects who complete a distance of at least 40m on the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT).

    Time frame: At visit 7, after an average of 7.5 hours of training and at visit 9, after an average of 9 hours of training.

    The 6MWT measures the distance in meters traversed over 6 min, on indoor surface.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of subjects who can complete at least 4 out of the 6 Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), in various simulated environments and with the exoskeleton.

    Time frame: At visit 7, after an average of 7.5 hours of training and at visit 9, after an average of 9 hours of training.

    The ADLs are done standing in front of the countertop in the kitchen, in a simulated living room, taking a 50m walk in the outdoor environment, taking the elevator, in the bathroom and walking in a hallway and through a door to get to the next room.

  2. Proportion of subjects who complete the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) on indoor surfaces in 1 minute or less.

    Time frame: At visit 7, after an average of 7.5 hours of training and at visit 9, after an average of 9 hours of training.

    The 10MWT measures the time in seconds taken to walk 10 meters.

  3. Proportion of subjects who can don or doff the device within 10 minutes each, separately.

    Time frame: At visit 7, after an average of 7.5 hours of training and at visit 9, after an average of 9 hours of training.

Other outcomes

  1. Proportion of users who pass the device "basic skills" certification evaluation at the end of visit 6.

    Time frame: Throughout the study and up until the end of Visit 6, after an average of 7.5 hours of training.

    During the Certification Evaluation, the users' performance in executing all the device usability critical tasks will be observed and assessed by the trainer to ensure they are performed correctly (i.e., executed safely, regardless of the level of companion assistance, that is documented but isn't a criterion for success). The "basic skills" certification evaluation is passed if all the device basic skills have been learnt through the previous training sessions with the device (visits 2-5) and the critical tasks are re-executed correctly during the evaluation at visit 6. The device basic skills cover device theoretical knowledge, proper setup and installation in the device, walking and other ambulatory functions on different surfaces, Activities of Daily Living in indoor and outdoor environment techniques on various surfaces, and safety features such as emergency extraction.

  2. Number of users who successfully master the different basic skills at a given visit

    Time frame: Throughout the study and up until the end of Visit 6, after an average of 7.5 hours of training.

    For each basic skill, the visit number at which users are confirmed to have safely mastered the task is recorded on a "checklist", which lists all the device basic skills and is provided to the trainer. The goal is to track the users' learning progress and mastery of the device over time.

  3. Evaluation of the assistance level provided by companion.

    Time frame: Throughout the study and up until the end of Visit 9, after an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.

    Assistance provided by the companion when mastering each basic skill on the checklist at initial learning, at the certification evaluation, during the additional practice session and when performing each test.

  4. Overall Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) assessed with the Borg RPE scale by the users for the entire session.

    Time frame: At the end of visit 6 after an average of 7.5 hours of training, at the end of visit 7 after an average of 7.5 hours of training and 1.5 hours of assessment and at the end of visit 9, after an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.

    The Borg scale rates the perceived exertion between 6 and 20 (very very light to very very hard exertion). The SCI users and their companions are asked to give their rating for the entire session, separately.

  5. Overall perceived safety with a 7-level Likert scale by the users on the entire session.

    Time frame: At the end of visit 6 after an average of 7.5 hours of training, at the end of visit 7 after an average of 7.5 hours of training and 1.5 hours of assessment and at the end of visit 9, after an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.

    Each participant - SCI user and companion separately - will be asked to provide his/her level of agreement on the following statement: "I felt safe during the session." by using a 7-level agreement scale from 1: "Strongly disagree" to 7: "Totally agree".

  6. Up-right time in the device at each session

    Time frame: Throughout the study and up until the end of Visit 9, after an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.

    This measure is taken by the device itself.

  7. Numbers of steps taken in the device at each session

    Time frame: Throughout the study and up until the end of Visit 9, after an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.

    The measure is taken by the device itself.

  8. Distance walked in the device at each session

    Time frame: Throughout the study and up until the end of Visit 9, after an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.

    The measure is taken by the device itself.

  9. Number of times the participants walk on each type of surface at each session

    Time frame: Throughout the study and up until the end of Visit 9, after an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.

    This data is collected by the device trainers at each session. Users are considered to have walked on a surface during a session if they have covered a minimum distance of 10 meters on that surface.

  10. Perceived health benefits and overall satisfaction and motivation.

    Time frame: At visit 9, after an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.

    Perceived health benefits and overall satisfaction and motivation of the SCI users, assessed by a modified version of the Gagnon questionnaire.

    The statements under evaluation will be taken from the 41 statements originally found in the Gagnon questionnaire that encompass seven domains :

    • overall program satisfaction,
    • satisfaction with the robotic exoskeleton,
    • learnability of the robotic exoskeleton,
    • satisfaction with the program attributes,
    • perceived health benefits of walking with the robotic exoskeleton,
    • perceived risks and fears of walking with the robotic exoskeleton and
    • perceived motivation to engage in regular physical activity.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Ann M Spungen, EdD

CONTACT

[email protected]

718-584-9000 ext. 5814

David Kim

CONTACT

[email protected]

718-584-9000 ext. 3122

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Wandercraft

Industry

Collaborators

  • James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Registry information

Official study title

Empowering Mobility in People With Spinal Cord Injury With a Hands-free, Self-balancing Personal Exoskeleton

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jan 16, 2025
Registry last updated
Feb 2, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.