Self Administered Cognitive Behavior Therapy
BehavioralThis 4 session treatment is aimed at controlling symptoms by changing specific behaviors found to aggravate IBS
NCT Number: NCT00738920
The primary goal of the proposed trial is to assess the short- and long-term efficacy of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for irritable bowel syndrome using two treatment delivery systems (self administered, therapist administered). Secondary aims seek to specify the conditions under which CBT may (or may not) achieve its effects (moderator questions), why and how these effects are achieved (mediator questions) and at what economic cost. Long term project goals are to develop an effective self-administered behavioral treatment program that can enhance the quality of patient care, improve clinical outcomes, and decrease the economic and personal costs of one of the most prevalent and intractable GI disorders.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic, prevalent, often disabling, GI disorder for which there is no reliable and satisfactory medical option for its full range of symptoms (abdominal pain, bowel dysfunction). An accumulating body of evidence indicates that a specific psychosocial treatment called cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is associated with significant reductions in IBS symptoms and related difficulties. Despite its apparent efficacy, CBT's clinical effectiveness (i.e., its generalizability, feasibility, cost effectiveness) has not been adequately established due partly to its duration, cost, and limited accessibility. As the "second generation" of IBS treatments undergo development and validation, it has become increasingly clear that efficacy demonstration is a necessary but not sufficient condition of treatment viability. In a pilot study funded under NIDDK's R03 mechanism, we addressed these problems by developing a briefer, largely self administered version of CBT that requires only 4, 1 hr clinic visits. Our RCT data showed that a 10 session version of CBT can be translated into a 4 session version without compromising patient acceptability or short term efficacy. It is unclear whether treatment effects are maintained long term (out to 12 months), due to theoretical change mechanisms (vs. nonspecific factors common across different forms of therapy), are more pronounced among specific subgroups of patients, or, generalize to a large sample of Rome III diagnosed patients treated by different investigative sites. We seek to address these questions by conducting a larger, more definitive, multisite RCT that will recruit from 2 treatment sites 480 patients with moderate to severe IBS and assess their acute and long term response to brief (4 session) CBT, extended (10 session) CBT, or a credible education/support condition. We will use the first year to develop a clinical infrastructure to ensure the success and integrity of the proposed trial. In the short term, a successful trial will lend empirical validation to a self administered version of CBT that retains the efficacy of standard CBT but is more transportable, accessible to patients outside of research protocols, and less costly to deliver. In the long term, we hope to show that a self guided behavioral treatment program is an effective and efficient treatment delivery system that can enhance the quality of patient care, improve clinical outcomes, and decrease the economic and personal costs of one of the most prevalent and intractable GI disorders.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
This 4 session treatment is aimed at controlling symptoms by changing specific behaviors found to aggravate IBS
This 10 session treatment is aimed at controlling symptoms by changing specific behaviors found to aggravate IBS
This 4 session treatment aims at controlling symptoms through support and the provision of information about IBS symptoms, how it is diagnosed, its causes, and treatment options and a collaborative, relationship between the patient and doctor
Time frame: 2-Week Follow-Up, 3-Month Follow-Up, 6-Month Follow-Up, 9-Month Follow-Up and 12-Month Follow-Up
The CGI-I is a single-item, 7-point centered scale that integrates symptom severity and improvement since the start of treatment. Specific IBS-based anchor points were used, as is the convention for multi-symptom disease states. Response range from 1 (very much worse) to 7 (very much improved), with higher scores indicating greater symptom improvement. Participants who respond 6 (much improved) or 7 (very much improved) are classified as treatment responders.
Time frame: Baseline, 2-Week Follow-Up, 3-Month Follow-Up, 6-Month Follow-Up, 9-Month Follow-Up and 12-Month Follow-Up
The IBS-SSS is a 5-item instrument used to measure severity of abdominal pain, frequency of abdominal pain, severity of abdominal distention, dissatisfaction with bowel habits, and interference with QOL. For four of the items, respondents mark a point on a 101 mm visual analogue scale to indicate their response to that item. The proportional distance from zero is the score (ranging from 0 to 100) assigned for that scale. The other item asks the number of days out of 10 the patient experiences abdominal pain and the answer is multiplied by 10 to create a 0 to 100 metric. The five items are summed and the total scores range from 0-500, with higher scores signifying more severe symptoms [mild (<175), moderate (175-300), severe (>300)]. A decrease of 50 points on the IBS-SSS is considered clinically significant.
Time frame: 2-Week Follow-Up
The CSQ is an 8-item questionnaire that measures patient satisfaction with treatment. Scores range from 8 to 32 with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction with treatment.
State University of New York at Buffalo
Other
Self Administered CBT for IBS: A Multisite Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06687720
Colonic Diseases, Colonic Diseases, Functional
Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
View Trial DetailsNCT07722572
Anxiety Disorders, Colonic Diseases
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT02136745
Colonic Diseases, Colonic Diseases, Functional
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06268717
Abdominal Pain, Alpha-Gal Syndrome
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
View Trial Details