Nottingham University Hospitals
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07136298
The aim of this project is to assess the ability of different groups of National Heath Service (NHS) professionals to correctly identify clinical seizures, and distinguish them from other movements commonly seen in the ICU environment, when shown digital video recordings only.
Patients on the ICU are at risk of having seizures, however also commonly make other movements, including shivering, jerking, tics and tremors. An Electroencephalogram (EEG) records the brain wave activity and can help distinguish epileptic seizures from other movements. In a study by Bendadis et al (2010), 52 video-EEGs were reviewed containing "possible seizures" on the ICU. They found only 27% recorded actual epileptic events, with the other 73% having a range of other movements. Malone et al (2009) studied accuracy of diagnosis of 20 video recordings of clinical episodes on the neonatal unit, comparing different staff groups. They found no significant difference between Doctors and Nurses in correctly identifying seizures, however found that accuracy of diagnosis was generally poor.
Clinical scientists are currently expanding their roles and responsibilities across Neurophysiology, including giving consultant-level advice on EEG investigations. EEG recordings on the ICU are often obscured by excessive, unavoidable electrical/movement artefacts caused by equipment such ventilators and pumps, and patient factors such as position, breathing artefact and suctioning. These make the EEG difficult to interpret (Boggs 2021). Assessing the clinical signs and symptoms which we may see in ICU patients, in the absence of interpretable EEG, is an essential skill.
This study aims to assess Clinical Scientists skills at clinical interpretation, in comparison with other staff groups in the ICU setting. Staff will be asked to watch video clips of events captured in the ICU, and tell us whether they think they are seizures or not, and explain their thought process behind the decision.
Interested in participating?
Request InfoAll sexes
Observational
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom
Location status: Recruiting
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Staff working at Nottingham University Hospitals (NUH) in one of the following staff groups;
Exclusion criteria
Staff participants will be asked to review video clips of events captured during EEGs performed on the ICU and asked to state whether they think the event was an epileptic seizure or not, and what aspects of each event led them to that decision
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The primary outcome measure is the level of agreement between the clinical opinion of the different staff groups and the EEG result
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The level of agreement between the different individuals in each staff group.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
thematic analysis of the decision making process (based on the free text justifications for why individuals made the choice they did)
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Other
Seizure Semiology Identification and Agreement in the Intensive Care Setting: How do Clinical Scientists Compare to Other Healthcare Professionals (Intensivists, Neurologists, ITU Nurses and Neurophysiologists) in Identifying and Interpreting Clinical Signs in Patients on the Adult Intensive Care Unit
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05864547
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Trondheim, Norway
View Trial DetailsNCT03419260
Nervous System Diseases, Neurologic Manifestations
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05140265
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03478852
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details