Ankara Bilkent City Hospital
Ankara, 06800, Turkey (Türkiye)
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Mücahid MD Mutlu, Resident
CONTACT
Mücahid Mutlu
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT07640243
This prospective, randomized, single-center study aims to evaluate and compare two different sedation and analgesia regimens used during percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) procedures. A total of 96 adult patients undergoing elective PTBD or biliary stenting will be randomized to receive either propofol-remifentanil or propofol-ketamine sedation. The primary outcome is recovery time assessed using the Modified Aldrete Score. Secondary outcomes include procedure quality, pain scores, patient and operator satisfaction, hemodynamic stability, and the incidence of sedation-related adverse events. The study is designed to determine the optimal sedation strategy for PTBD, particularly in fragile and elderly patient populations.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ankara, 06800, Turkey (Türkiye)
Location status: Recruiting
Mücahid MD Mutlu, Resident
CONTACT
Mücahid Mutlu
CONTACT
Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) is a therapeutic procedure commonly performed in patients with biliary obstruction when surgical intervention or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is not feasible. These patients frequently present with advanced age, malignancy, cholangitis, and significant comorbidities, making them particularly vulnerable to sedation-related complications.
Procedural sedation and analgesia are commonly used during interventional radiology procedures to ensure patient comfort, immobility, and procedural success. However, inadequate sedation may result in patient movement, increased anxiety, procedural failure, and complications, whereas excessive sedation may lead to hemodynamic instability, respiratory depression, and delayed recovery, especially in frail patients.
In this study, two commonly used sedation regimens-propofol combined with remifentanil and propofol combined with ketamine-will be compared. Both regimens are routinely used in non-operating room anesthesia settings in our institution. Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of the two groups. Standard monitoring will be applied, including non-invasive blood pressure, electrocardiography, and pulse oximetry, with supplemental oxygen administered via nasal cannula.
Sedation depth will be targeted to a Ramsay Sedation Score of 3-4 and assessed every five minutes during the procedure. Hemodynamic parameters, oxygen saturation, pain scores, recovery time, and adverse events such as hypotension, bradycardia, hypoxia, nausea, vomiting, and airway interventions will be recorded. Recovery will be evaluated using the Modified Aldrete Score at two-minute intervals until adequate recovery is achieved.
The primary objective of the study is to compare recovery times between the two sedation regimens. Secondary objectives include comparison of pain intensity, patient and operator satisfaction, total drug consumption, procedural tolerance, and incidence of adverse events. The findings of this study aim to contribute to safer and more effective sedation strategies for PTBD procedures in high-risk patient populations.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Intravenous propofol combined with remifentanil infusion for procedural sedation during percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage.
Intravenous propofol combined with ketamine bolus for procedural sedation during percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage.
Time frame: From completion of the procedure until Modified Aldrete Score >8, assessed up to 30 minutes
Time to achieve adequate recovery assessed using the Modified Aldrete Score.
Time frame: Baseline, every 5 minutes during the procedure (assessed up to 60 minutes), and immediately after the procedure.
Changes in systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation during the procedure.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-procedure), immediately after recovery, and at 30 minutes post-recovery.
Pain intensity assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time frame: Every 5 minutes during the procedure, assessed up to 30 minutes.
Sedation level assessed using the Ramsay Sedation Scale.
Time frame: Perioperatively and through the recovery period, assessed up to 30 minutes.
Incidence of sedation-related adverse events including hypotension, bradycardia, hypoxia, apnea, nausea, and vomiting.
Time frame: Immediately after the procedure
Patient and operator satisfaction assessed after completion of the procedure.
Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
Other
Evaluation of Sedation Methods Used in Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage Procedures in Terms of Procedure Quality, Recovery Time, and Side Effects
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03101631
Cancer, Fragility
View Trial DetailsNCT07732257
Apnea, Apnea of Prematurity
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06286891
Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension, Fragility
São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT07637383
Behavior, Fragility
Manresa, Barcelona, Spain
View Trial Details