Jordan University Hospital
Amman, 13046, Jordan
NCT Number: NCT04285528
Anesthesia in urological surgeries might constitute a great challenge to anesthesiologists. Especially that a great proportion of these patients are elderly with a lot of comorbidities. This put these patients at the risk of developing medical adverse events after being anesthetized by general anesthesia. The aim of this study is to compare between intravenous sedation with analgesia versus general anesthesia in patients undergoing urological surgical procedures.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Amman, 13046, Jordan
Anesthesia in urological surgeries might constitute a great challenge to anesthesiologists. Especially that a great proportion of these patients are elderly with a lot of comorbidities. This put these patients at the risk of developing medical adverse events after being anesthetized by general anesthesia. The aim of this study is to compare between intravenous sedation with analgesia versus general anesthesia in patients undergoing urological surgical procedures.
The first group which underwent general anesthesia, was anesthetized using Fentanyl (2 mcg per kg) and Propofol (1-2 mg per kg). Laryngeal mask airway was then inserted.
The second group underwent intravenous sedation and analgesia by using a mixture of Fentanyl, Propofol and Ketamine (PFK mixture). The mixture consists of 100 mcg Fentanyl, 100 mg Propofol, 100 mg of Ketamine. In addition, 40 mg of Lidocaine were added, this aimed to reduce the pain on injection caused by Propofol. Moreover, 4 ml of water of injection were added to the mixture. This resulted in a mixture of 5 mcg/ml of Fentanyl, 5 mg/ml of Propofol, and 5 mg/ml of Ketamine. By this, each ml of the mixture contained 10 mg (ketamine and propofol) + 5 mcg fentanyl. Each patient received an initial dose of 0.5 mg/kg from the solution, then after waiting for 60 seconds, another 0.5 mg/kg were given. Maintenance was given as boluses of 0.2- 0.33 mg/kg every three to five minutes. No laryngeal mask airway nor endotracheal tube were inserted, and the patients were breathing spontaneously through a simple face mask on support of 3 L/min O2.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients were anesthetized using Fentanyl (2 mcg per kg) and Propofol (1-2 mg per kg). Proper classic laryngeal mask airway was inserted afterwards.
Other names: GA
A mixture of 5 mcg/ml of Fentanyl, 5 mg/ml of Propofol, and 5 mg/ml of Ketamine was used. Each patient received an initial dose of 0.5 mg/kg from the solution, then after waiting for 60 seconds, another 0.5 mg/kg were given. Maintenance was given as boluses of 0.2- 0.33 mg/kg every three to five minutes. No Laryngeal mask airway nor endotracheal tube were inserted, and the patients were breathing spontaneously through a simple face mask on a support of 3 L/min O2.
Other names: propofol-ketamine-fentanyl (PFK) mixture, the mixture of propofol, ketamine, fentanyl, with lidocaine
Time frame: 45 minutes
the investigators recorded the changes in blood pressure after induction of anesthesia
Time frame: 45 minutes
the investigators recorded any episodes of transient reduction of oxygen saturation.
Time frame: 2 hours
The investigators recorded the occurrence of nausea and vomiting till the discharge of the patients from post anesthesia care unit (PACU).
University of Jordan
Other
Intravenous Sedation and Analgesia Using Propofol, Fentanyl and Ketamine (PFK) Versus General Anesthesia in Minor Urological Procedures.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04770259
Anesthesia, Digestive Disease
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile
View Trial DetailsNCT03927781
Acute Pain, Anesthesia
Columbia, Missouri, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05564741
Anesthesia, Cardiovascular Diseases
Mölndal, V. Götaland, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT07327320
Anesthesia, Cardiovascular Diseases
Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
View Trial Details