NCT Number: NCT01997918
Secondary Haplo HSCT for Relapse After Initial Allogeneic HSCT
Relapse of underlying hematologic malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is frequently treated by a second allogeneic HSCT (HSCT2). Choosing an alternative donor is often advocated to maximize chances of a graft versus tumour (GVT) effect. We and others published that success of this strategy when using an alternative human leukocyte antigen (HLA) identical donor is limited, at least when acute leukemia is the underlying disease. The aggressivity of the rapidly proliferating leukemia seems to prevail over GVT effects. A more potent alloimmune response is observed following haploidentical HSCT, especially early after haploidentical HSCT. This might be related to a fast and large expansion of natural killer (NK)-cells. Their alloreactive effect might translate into higher rates of tumor control. On the other hand, non-relapse complications (treatment related mortality, TRM) might be high in advanced relapsed tumour patients with heavy pretreatment and due to delayed immune reconstitution after haploidentical HSCT. The use of a haploidentical donor for HSCT2 following a first allogeneic HSCT from an HLA identical donor has been so far only systematically evaluated in small retrospective single center reports. Thus, in this multicenter study we aim to collect data on the extent to which participating centers employ haploidentical transplantation in the situation of relapse after HSCT2.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Observational
About this study
Relapse of underlying hematologic malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is frequently treated by a second allogeneic HSCT (HSCT2). Choosing an alternative donor is often advocated to maximize chances of a graft versus tumour (GVT) effect. We and others published that success of this strategy when using an alternative HLA identical donor is limited, at least when acute leukemia is the underlying disease. The aggressivity of the rapidly proliferating leukemia seems to prevail over GVT effects. A more potent alloimmune response is observed following haploidentical HSCT, especially early after haploidentical HSCT. This might be related to a fast and large expansion of NK-cells. Their alloreactive effect might translate into higher rates of tumor control. On the other hand, non-relapse complications (treatment related mortality, TRM) might be high in advanced relapsed tumour patients with heavy pretreatment and due to delayed immune reconstitution after haploidentical HSCT. The use of a haploidentical donor for HSCT2 following a first allogeneic HSCT from an HLA identical donor has been so far only systematically evaluated in small retrospective single center reports. Thus, in this multicenter study we aim to collect data on the extent to which participating centers employ haploidentical transplantation in the situation of relapse after HSCT2. We will describe and quantify the specific patient, donor, treatment, graft and outcomes characteristics associated with the course of treatment. To assess and control for the bias that is associated with the retrospective nature of this study, we will emphasize to collect clearly stated reasons for the decision to use a haploidentical transplant, e.g. as opposed to drug therapy or a second transplant from the original or an alternative HLA identical donor. This is a retrospective observational cohort study. German centers performing allogeneic HSCT are asked to contribute. Data will be validated and missing information will be further retrieved by the four principal investigators through phone. Final follow up will be performed in April 2014, 2014. To be able to supply durable data on the primary endpoints, only patients receiving a haploidentical HSCT2 between 01.07.2003 and 30.06.2013 will be included.
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Age >18 years at time of HSCT2
- Malignant hematologic disease
- Informed consent signed by the patients on the use of data in registry analyses
- 1st allogeneic HSCT performed from any donor, including haploidentical HSCT1
- Hematological or extramedullary relapse after HSCT1
- Haploidentical 2nd allogeneic HSCT (i.e. >= 2 Antigen mismatch family donor) between 01.07.2003 and 30.06.2013
Third or higher allogeneic HSCT does not preclude analysis as long as HSCT2 was haploidentical.
Treatment and study plan
Primary outcomes
-
Treatment related mortality (TRM) of haploidentical HSCT2
Time frame: up to day 365
-
Toxicity of haploidentical HSCT2
Time frame: up to day 365
NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.4
Secondary outcomes
-
complete remission (CR) rate after haploidentical HSCT2
Time frame: day 100
-
Overall survival (OS) at 2 years after haploidentical HSCT2
Time frame: 2 years
-
Graft versus host disease (GVHD) after haploidentical HSCT2
Time frame: 2 years
-
Incidence of rejection after haploidentical HSCT2
Time frame: 1 year
-
Disease free survival (DFS) at 2 years after haploidentical HSCT2
Time frame: 2 years
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
University Hospital Tuebingen
Other
Collaborators
- Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich
- University Hospital Augsburg
Registry information
Official study title
Haploidentical Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) in the Treatment of Relapse After a First Allogeneic HSCT: a Retrospective Cohort Study by the German Cooperative Transplant Study Group
Important dates
- Study start
- 2013
- Primary completion
- 2017
- Study completion
- 2017
- First posted
- Nov 28, 2013
- Registry last updated
- May 3, 2018
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.