Department for Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, 8091, Switzerland
NCT Number: NCT02633592
To assess whether HR-ARM (High resolution Anorectal Manometry) performed in the more naturalistic / physiological upright, seated position on a commode provides a more valid assessment of anorectal function and simulated defecation than the same test performed in the standard, left lateral position
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, 8091, Switzerland
High Resolution Anorectal Manometry (HR-ARM) with data presented as pressure topography is a recent addition to the tests available for diagnosis of defecatory disorders including fecal incontinence and constipation.HR-ARM represents an advance on conventional manometry because closely spaced sensors across the anal sphincter remove the need for a pull-through procedure and facilitate data acquisition and interpretation. In particular measurements are not confounded by changes in position of the catheter relative to anal sphincter that occur during voluntary contraction and, especially, simulated defecation.
Notwithstanding these technological improvements, important concerns remain about the validity of manometry measurements during simulated defecation. These concerns are based on the observation in both conventional and HR-ARM that a large proportion of healthy individuals appear to have abnormal anorectal function ("dyssynergia") during simulated defecation.This limitation led to the recommendation that the finding of dyssynergia on manometry should be confirmed by defecography. This is unsatisfactory as diagnostic tests should not have a high rate of "false positives" and also because this increases the time and costs needed to complete diagnostic investigation in patients with defecatory disorders.
The high rate of abnormal findings in healthy individuals may be because current manometry procedures and other anorectal tests (e.g. rectal balloon expulsion) are usually performed, not in the upright, seated position (USP) usually adopted for defecation, but in the un-physiological left lateral position (LLP). Several factors may contribute. First, defecation in the LLP is not aided by gravity as it is in the sitting position. Second, anorectal anatomy may be altered and less conducive to the passage of stool in the LLP. Third, simulating defecation in the LLP does not reflect normal behavior and, despite optimal interaction and explanation by the investigator, changes in patient behavior may result in apparent "dyssynergia" Finally, social stress, related to proximity of the investigator observing defecation, makes individuals feel unable to strain at stool or attempt defecation.
A simple probe holder device that, by adhering to the skin is positioned at the natal cleft to support the ManoScan HR ARM catheter can be used to assess anorectal pressures in the sitting position (both produced by Given Imaging, Yoqeam, Israel). This simple device stabilizes the catheter position when the patient is in USP on a commode and allows the investigator to withdraw behind the curtains of the examination cubicle.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria
All
Patients with fecal incontinence
Patients with obstructive defecation
Exclusion criteria
Patients and healthy volunteers are investigated in the seated and lying position during HRAM
Patients and healthy volunteers are investigated in the supine and left lateral position in the MRI
Other names: MRD
Time frame: 1 hour
RAPG change in the LLP and sitting position (mmHg)
Time frame: 1 hour
RAPG of -40mmHg or lower
Time frame: 1 hour
paradox contraction or no opening of the anal canal
Time frame: 1 hour
diagnostic concordance of the two investigations
Time frame: 1 hour
Categorical (forced choice) LLP vs. SEAT
University of Zurich
Other
Seated Evaluation of Anorectal funcTion by High Resolution Anorectal Manometry: a Randomized Comparison of Measurements in the Seated and Left Lateral Positions
Acronym: SEAT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04155307
Anismus, Distal Constipation
Rouen, France
View Trial DetailsNCT04879524
Anismus, Defecation Disorder
London, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT00556283
Anismus, Digestive System Diseases
Besançon, France
View Trial DetailsNCT00735605
Anismus, Constipation
Al Mansurah, Egypt
View Trial Details